Change in Emergency Department Length of Stay Following Routine Adoption of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography to Differentiate Intracranial Hemorrhage from Calcification.

Ngoc-Anh Tran, Christopher A Potter, Camden P Bay, Aaron D Sodickson
{"title":"Change in Emergency Department Length of Stay Following Routine Adoption of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography to Differentiate Intracranial Hemorrhage from Calcification.","authors":"Ngoc-Anh Tran, Christopher A Potter, Camden P Bay, Aaron D Sodickson","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Dual energy computed tomography (DECT) is an advanced CT technique which has been shown to improve accuracy in distinguishing between intracranial hemorrhage and calcification, which is often challenging on conventional CT and therefore may warrant repeat imaging in the emergency department (ED) to document stability and exclude enlarging intracranial hemorrhage. We hypothesized that implementation of a DECT head protocol with fully automated post processing in the ED would decrease the need for repeat imaging and therefore reduce overall ED length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study comparing ED length of stay over a one-year period before (7/1/2016-6/30/2017) and after (7/1/2018-6/30/2019) implementing a DECT head protocol, for patients scanned for headache, trauma or fall, who were found to have indeterminate intracranial hyperdensities on conventional images, and were subsequently discharged home from the ER (excluding patients who were admitted, taken to the OR, or left against medical advice). Additional clinical information regarding ED time course and management were also reviewed, including data on time to CT scan, CT report, and if applicable, time to repeat CT head and neurosurgical consultation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in patient demographics and CT indications between the pre-DECT and post-DECT cohorts. There was a small but statistically significant difference in mean baseline ED LOS in the initial cohorts of 20 minutes (p=0.002). After the inclusion of only intracranial indeterminate hyperdensities, there was a larger statistically significant difference in ED LOS, with mean pre-DECT LOS of 421 minutes and mean post-DECT LOS of 272 mins, resulting in mean LOS reduction of 149 mins (p=0.003). The increased ED LOS correlated with increased frequency of neurosurgical consultation and repeat CT head for the findings of indeterminate intracranial hyperdensities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED LOS was significantly longer in the pre-DECT cohort, which was partly attributable to neurosurgical consultation and repeat CT head performed for indeterminate intracranial hyperdensities.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>DECT= Dual Energy CT; ED LOS= Emergency department length of stay; NECT = Noncontrast enhanced CT; VNCa= Virtual non-calcium.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Dual energy computed tomography (DECT) is an advanced CT technique which has been shown to improve accuracy in distinguishing between intracranial hemorrhage and calcification, which is often challenging on conventional CT and therefore may warrant repeat imaging in the emergency department (ED) to document stability and exclude enlarging intracranial hemorrhage. We hypothesized that implementation of a DECT head protocol with fully automated post processing in the ED would decrease the need for repeat imaging and therefore reduce overall ED length of stay (LOS).

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study comparing ED length of stay over a one-year period before (7/1/2016-6/30/2017) and after (7/1/2018-6/30/2019) implementing a DECT head protocol, for patients scanned for headache, trauma or fall, who were found to have indeterminate intracranial hyperdensities on conventional images, and were subsequently discharged home from the ER (excluding patients who were admitted, taken to the OR, or left against medical advice). Additional clinical information regarding ED time course and management were also reviewed, including data on time to CT scan, CT report, and if applicable, time to repeat CT head and neurosurgical consultation.

Results: There was no significant difference in patient demographics and CT indications between the pre-DECT and post-DECT cohorts. There was a small but statistically significant difference in mean baseline ED LOS in the initial cohorts of 20 minutes (p=0.002). After the inclusion of only intracranial indeterminate hyperdensities, there was a larger statistically significant difference in ED LOS, with mean pre-DECT LOS of 421 minutes and mean post-DECT LOS of 272 mins, resulting in mean LOS reduction of 149 mins (p=0.003). The increased ED LOS correlated with increased frequency of neurosurgical consultation and repeat CT head for the findings of indeterminate intracranial hyperdensities.

Conclusions: ED LOS was significantly longer in the pre-DECT cohort, which was partly attributable to neurosurgical consultation and repeat CT head performed for indeterminate intracranial hyperdensities.

Abbreviations: DECT= Dual Energy CT; ED LOS= Emergency department length of stay; NECT = Noncontrast enhanced CT; VNCa= Virtual non-calcium.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信