Construction of a Competency Evaluation Indicator System for Emergency Response Staff in Disease Control and Prevention Institutions - China, 2023.

IF 4.3 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zhaohe Li, Xijiang Wang, Wenqing Bai, Haoliang Liu, Yue Gu, Jiayi Zhang, Huimin Li, Hongtao Wu, Ruiqi Ren, Chao Li, Qi Wang, Zainawudong Yushan, Lei Zhou
{"title":"Construction of a Competency Evaluation Indicator System for Emergency Response Staff in Disease Control and Prevention Institutions - China, 2023.","authors":"Zhaohe Li, Xijiang Wang, Wenqing Bai, Haoliang Liu, Yue Gu, Jiayi Zhang, Huimin Li, Hongtao Wu, Ruiqi Ren, Chao Li, Qi Wang, Zainawudong Yushan, Lei Zhou","doi":"10.46234/ccdcw2024.260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>What is already known about this topic?: </strong>Currently, there is no established scientific standard to guide disease control and prevention organizations in the selection of emergency response personnel. Given the growing risk of significant infectious disease outbreaks, it is imperative to develop an evaluation system for assessing emergency response capabilities.</p><p><strong>What is added by this report?: </strong>Drawing from competency theory, this study developed an assessment framework for evaluating the emergency response capabilities of staff at disease control and prevention institutions focused on major infectious diseases. Utilizing the Delphi method, the framework comprises 4 first-level indicators: <i>Knowledge base, Professional skills, Personal qualities, Personality and Motivation</i>. Further, it includes 10 second-level and 46 third-level indicators. The reliability and validity of this evaluation system were examined through a questionnaire survey. The results show that the indicator system has good reliability, acceptable discriminant and convergent validity, and that competency can be evaluated scientifically.</p><p><strong>What are the implications for public health practice?: </strong>The system provides an efficient tool for selecting and organizing emergency personnel for response tasks, thereby enhancing the CDC staff's capacity for emergency management.</p>","PeriodicalId":69039,"journal":{"name":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","volume":"6 49","pages":"1306-1312"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国疾病预防控制中心周报","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2024.260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What is already known about this topic?: Currently, there is no established scientific standard to guide disease control and prevention organizations in the selection of emergency response personnel. Given the growing risk of significant infectious disease outbreaks, it is imperative to develop an evaluation system for assessing emergency response capabilities.

What is added by this report?: Drawing from competency theory, this study developed an assessment framework for evaluating the emergency response capabilities of staff at disease control and prevention institutions focused on major infectious diseases. Utilizing the Delphi method, the framework comprises 4 first-level indicators: Knowledge base, Professional skills, Personal qualities, Personality and Motivation. Further, it includes 10 second-level and 46 third-level indicators. The reliability and validity of this evaluation system were examined through a questionnaire survey. The results show that the indicator system has good reliability, acceptable discriminant and convergent validity, and that competency can be evaluated scientifically.

What are the implications for public health practice?: The system provides an efficient tool for selecting and organizing emergency personnel for response tasks, thereby enhancing the CDC staff's capacity for emergency management.

疾病预防控制机构应急人员能力评价指标体系构建——中国,2023。
关于这个话题我们已经知道了什么?目前,疾病预防控制机构在应急响应人员的选择上还没有建立起科学的标准来指导。鉴于重大传染病暴发的风险日益增加,必须建立一个评估应急能力的评估系统。这份报告增加了什么内容?根据胜任力理论,本研究开发了一个评估框架,用于评估以重大传染病为重点的疾病控制和预防机构工作人员的应急反应能力。利用德尔菲法,该框架包括4个一级指标:知识基础、专业技能、个人素质、个性和动机。此外,它还包括10个二级指标和46个三级指标。通过问卷调查对评价体系的信度和效度进行了检验。结果表明,该指标体系具有良好的信度、可接受的判别效度和收敛效度,能够对胜任力进行科学的评价。这对公共卫生实践有什么影响?该系统为选择和组织应急人员执行响应任务提供了一个有效的工具,从而提高了疾病预防控制中心工作人员的应急管理能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信