Bridging genomics' greatest challenge: The diversity gap.

IF 11.1 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY
Cell genomics Pub Date : 2025-01-08 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100724
Manuel Corpas, Mkpouto Pius, Marie Poburennaya, Heinner Guio, Miriam Dwek, Shivashankar Nagaraj, Catalina Lopez-Correa, Alice Popejoy, Segun Fatumo
{"title":"Bridging genomics' greatest challenge: The diversity gap.","authors":"Manuel Corpas, Mkpouto Pius, Marie Poburennaya, Heinner Guio, Miriam Dwek, Shivashankar Nagaraj, Catalina Lopez-Correa, Alice Popejoy, Segun Fatumo","doi":"10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Achieving diverse representation in biomedical data is critical for healthcare equity. Failure to do so perpetuates health disparities and exacerbates biases that may harm patients with underrepresented ancestral backgrounds. We present a quantitative assessment of representation in datasets used across human genomics, including genome-wide association studies (GWASs), pharmacogenomics, clinical trials, and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. We suggest that relative proportions of ancestries represented in datasets, compared to the global census population, provide insufficient representation of global ancestral genetic diversity. Some populations have greater proportional representation in data relative to their population size and the genomic diversity present in their ancestral haplotypes. As insights from genomics become increasingly integrated into evidence-based medicine, strategic inclusion and effective mechanisms to ensure representation of global genomic diversity in datasets are imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":72539,"journal":{"name":"Cell genomics","volume":" ","pages":"100724"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11770215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2024.100724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving diverse representation in biomedical data is critical for healthcare equity. Failure to do so perpetuates health disparities and exacerbates biases that may harm patients with underrepresented ancestral backgrounds. We present a quantitative assessment of representation in datasets used across human genomics, including genome-wide association studies (GWASs), pharmacogenomics, clinical trials, and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing. We suggest that relative proportions of ancestries represented in datasets, compared to the global census population, provide insufficient representation of global ancestral genetic diversity. Some populations have greater proportional representation in data relative to their population size and the genomic diversity present in their ancestral haplotypes. As insights from genomics become increasingly integrated into evidence-based medicine, strategic inclusion and effective mechanisms to ensure representation of global genomic diversity in datasets are imperative.

弥合基因组学最大的挑战:多样性差距。
实现生物医学数据的多样化代表对医疗保健公平至关重要。如果不这样做,就会使健康差距长期存在,并加剧偏见,可能会伤害那些祖先背景未被充分代表的患者。我们对人类基因组学中使用的数据集中的代表性进行了定量评估,包括全基因组关联研究(GWASs)、药物基因组学、临床试验和直接面向消费者(DTC)的基因检测。我们认为,与全球人口普查相比,数据集中所代表的祖先的相对比例不足以代表全球祖先的遗传多样性。一些种群在数据中有更大的比例代表性,相对于它们的种群大小和它们祖先单倍型中存在的基因组多样性。随着基因组学的见解越来越多地融入循证医学,确保在数据集中体现全球基因组多样性的战略包容和有效机制势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信