Recurrent pregnancy loss: risk factors and predictive modeling approaches.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Xiaoyu Zhang, Jiawei Gao, Liuxin Yang, Xiaoling Feng, Xingxing Yuan
{"title":"Recurrent pregnancy loss: risk factors and predictive modeling approaches.","authors":"Xiaoyu Zhang, Jiawei Gao, Liuxin Yang, Xiaoling Feng, Xingxing Yuan","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2024.2440043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review aims to identify and analyze the risk factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and to evaluate the effectiveness of various predictive models in estimating the risk of RPL. The review also explores recent advancements in machine learning algorithms that can enhance the accuracy of these predictive models. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of how these tools can aid in the personalized management of women experiencing RPL.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The review synthesizes current literature on RPL, focusing on various risk factors such as chromosomal abnormalities, autoimmune conditions, hormonal imbalances, and structural uterine anomalies. It also analyzes different predictive models for RPL risk assessment, including genetic screening tools, risk scoring systems that integrate multiple clinical parameters, and machine learning algorithms capable of processing complex datasets. The effectiveness and limitations of these models are critically evaluated to provide insights into their clinical application.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key risk factors for RPL were identified, including chromosomal abnormalities (e.g. translocations and aneuploidies), autoimmune conditions (e.g. antiphospholipid syndrome), hormonal imbalances (e.g. thyroid dysfunction and luteal phase defects), and structural uterine anomalies (e.g. septate or fibroid-affected uteri). Predictive models such as genetic screening tools and risk scoring systems were shown to be effective in estimating RPL risk. Recent advancements in machine learning algorithms demonstrate potential for enhancing predictive accuracy by analyzing complex datasets, which may lead to improved personalized management strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The integration of risk factors and predictive modeling offers a promising approach to improving outcomes for women affected by RPL. A comprehensive understanding of these factors and models can aid clinicians and researchers in refining risk assessment and developing targeted interventions. The review underscores the need for further research into specific pathways involved in RPL and the potential of novel treatments aimed at mitigating risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50146,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"2440043"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2024.2440043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This review aims to identify and analyze the risk factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and to evaluate the effectiveness of various predictive models in estimating the risk of RPL. The review also explores recent advancements in machine learning algorithms that can enhance the accuracy of these predictive models. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of how these tools can aid in the personalized management of women experiencing RPL.

Materials and methods: The review synthesizes current literature on RPL, focusing on various risk factors such as chromosomal abnormalities, autoimmune conditions, hormonal imbalances, and structural uterine anomalies. It also analyzes different predictive models for RPL risk assessment, including genetic screening tools, risk scoring systems that integrate multiple clinical parameters, and machine learning algorithms capable of processing complex datasets. The effectiveness and limitations of these models are critically evaluated to provide insights into their clinical application.

Results: Key risk factors for RPL were identified, including chromosomal abnormalities (e.g. translocations and aneuploidies), autoimmune conditions (e.g. antiphospholipid syndrome), hormonal imbalances (e.g. thyroid dysfunction and luteal phase defects), and structural uterine anomalies (e.g. septate or fibroid-affected uteri). Predictive models such as genetic screening tools and risk scoring systems were shown to be effective in estimating RPL risk. Recent advancements in machine learning algorithms demonstrate potential for enhancing predictive accuracy by analyzing complex datasets, which may lead to improved personalized management strategies.

Conclusions: The integration of risk factors and predictive modeling offers a promising approach to improving outcomes for women affected by RPL. A comprehensive understanding of these factors and models can aid clinicians and researchers in refining risk assessment and developing targeted interventions. The review underscores the need for further research into specific pathways involved in RPL and the potential of novel treatments aimed at mitigating risk.

复发性流产:危险因素和预测建模方法。
目的:本综述旨在识别和分析与复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)相关的危险因素,并评价各种预测模型在估计复发性妊娠丢失风险中的有效性。本文还探讨了机器学习算法的最新进展,这些算法可以提高这些预测模型的准确性。最终目标是全面了解这些工具如何帮助对经历RPL的妇女进行个性化管理。材料和方法:本综述综合了目前关于RPL的文献,重点介绍了各种危险因素,如染色体异常、自身免疫性疾病、激素失衡和子宫结构性异常。它还分析了RPL风险评估的不同预测模型,包括遗传筛查工具、集成多个临床参数的风险评分系统以及能够处理复杂数据集的机器学习算法。对这些模型的有效性和局限性进行了批判性评估,以提供对其临床应用的见解。结果:确定了RPL的主要危险因素,包括染色体异常(如易位和非整倍体)、自身免疫性疾病(如抗磷脂综合征)、激素失衡(如甲状腺功能障碍和黄体期缺陷)和结构性子宫异常(如子宫间隔或子宫肌瘤影响)。遗传筛选工具和风险评分系统等预测模型在估计RPL风险方面被证明是有效的。机器学习算法的最新进展证明了通过分析复杂数据集来提高预测准确性的潜力,这可能导致改进个性化管理策略。结论:风险因素和预测模型的整合为改善女性RPL的预后提供了一个有希望的方法。对这些因素和模型的全面了解可以帮助临床医生和研究人员改进风险评估和制定有针对性的干预措施。该综述强调需要进一步研究RPL中涉及的特定途径以及旨在降低风险的新治疗方法的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of The European Association of Perinatal Medicine, The Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies and The International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. The journal publishes a wide range of peer-reviewed research on the obstetric, medical, genetic, mental health and surgical complications of pregnancy and their effects on the mother, fetus and neonate. Research on audit, evaluation and clinical care in maternal-fetal and perinatal medicine is also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信