Coronary artery calcification score as the determinant of coronary artery disease in chronic kidney disease patients: A preliminary study.

IF 0.5 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Maryam Moradi, Ali Talebi, Sara Shavakhi, Mohammad Javad Tarrahi, Fouad Meraji Far
{"title":"Coronary artery calcification score as the determinant of coronary artery disease in chronic kidney disease patients: A preliminary study.","authors":"Maryam Moradi, Ali Talebi, Sara Shavakhi, Mohammad Javad Tarrahi, Fouad Meraji Far","doi":"10.48305/arya.2023.39234.2832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive cardiovascular imaging procedure that visualizes coronary artery calcifications (CAC), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. Due to different calcification patterns in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) compared to the general population, this study aims to present diagnostic cut-off values for CAC to detect early coronary artery disease (CAD) in CKD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 807 patients: 407 with CKD and 400 controls with normal kidney function who underwent CCTA during 2019-2021. CAC score measurements were performed for all left main coronary arteries to investigate CAD. The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was used as the gold standard to determine the value of CAC, and diagnostic values were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of female patients was 443 (54.9%), and 364 (45.1%) were male. The mean age in the case group was 63.95 ± 10.26 years, and in the control group, it was 53.80 ± 11.84 years. At the cut-off point of 85, the CAC score had a sensitivity and specificity of 84.7% and 83%, respectively, among patients with CKD to detect CAD (Area Under the Curve (AUC): 0.919, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94; P-value < 0.001). Considering a cut-point of 85 for CAC, the frequency of healthy subjects with CAD-RADS less than two was significantly higher than the cases (P-value = 0.012), while the two groups were similar regarding CAD-RADS 3-5 (P-value = 0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to this study, the CAC score is a valuable means to detect CAD among CKD subjects. There is no significant difference in CAC between patients with substantial CAD-RADS in CKD and non-CKD patients. The cut-point of 85 for the CAC score was found valuable to diagnose CAD with over 80% sensitivity and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46477,"journal":{"name":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","volume":"20 3","pages":"12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651311/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48305/arya.2023.39234.2832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive cardiovascular imaging procedure that visualizes coronary artery calcifications (CAC), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis. Due to different calcification patterns in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) compared to the general population, this study aims to present diagnostic cut-off values for CAC to detect early coronary artery disease (CAD) in CKD patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 807 patients: 407 with CKD and 400 controls with normal kidney function who underwent CCTA during 2019-2021. CAC score measurements were performed for all left main coronary arteries to investigate CAD. The Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) was used as the gold standard to determine the value of CAC, and diagnostic values were measured.

Results: The number of female patients was 443 (54.9%), and 364 (45.1%) were male. The mean age in the case group was 63.95 ± 10.26 years, and in the control group, it was 53.80 ± 11.84 years. At the cut-off point of 85, the CAC score had a sensitivity and specificity of 84.7% and 83%, respectively, among patients with CKD to detect CAD (Area Under the Curve (AUC): 0.919, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94; P-value < 0.001). Considering a cut-point of 85 for CAC, the frequency of healthy subjects with CAD-RADS less than two was significantly higher than the cases (P-value = 0.012), while the two groups were similar regarding CAD-RADS 3-5 (P-value = 0.83).

Conclusion: According to this study, the CAC score is a valuable means to detect CAD among CKD subjects. There is no significant difference in CAC between patients with substantial CAD-RADS in CKD and non-CKD patients. The cut-point of 85 for the CAC score was found valuable to diagnose CAD with over 80% sensitivity and specificity.

冠状动脉钙化评分作为慢性肾病患者冠状动脉病变的决定因素:初步研究
背景:冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)是一种无创心血管成像程序,可显示冠状动脉钙化(CAC),这是亚临床动脉粥样硬化的标志。由于慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者的钙化模式与一般人群不同,本研究旨在提出CAC的诊断临界值,以检测CKD患者的早期冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。方法:这项横断面研究包括807例患者,其中407例CKD患者和400例正常肾功能对照组,他们在2019-2021年期间接受了CCTA。对所有左主干冠状动脉进行CAC评分以研究CAD。以冠状动脉疾病报告与数据系统(CAD-RADS)为金标准确定CAC值,并测定其诊断价值。结果:女性443例(54.9%),男性364例(45.1%)。病例组平均年龄为63.95±10.26岁,对照组平均年龄为53.80±11.84岁。截止点为85时,CAC评分在CKD患者中检测CAD的敏感性和特异性分别为84.7%和83%(曲线下面积(Area Under the Curve, AUC): 0.919, 95% CI: 0.89-0.94;p值< 0.001)。考虑到CAC的临界值为85,健康受试者CAD-RADS小于2的频率显著高于病例(p值= 0.012),而两组在CAD-RADS 3-5方面相似(p值= 0.83)。结论:CAC评分是检测CKD患者CAD的一种有价值的手段。存在大量CAD-RADS的CKD患者与非CKD患者的CAC无显著差异。CAC评分的分界点85被发现对诊断CAD具有超过80%的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARYA Atherosclerosis
ARYA Atherosclerosis CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信