Comparative effectiveness of different interventions on adherence to exercise-based CR among patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Chengyu Xia, Yingjun Zheng, Liuxia Ji, Hui Liu
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of different interventions on adherence to exercise-based CR among patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Chengyu Xia, Yingjun Zheng, Liuxia Ji, Hui Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02561-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation is critical for post-PCI patients, but adherence to exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation remains low. Many studies aimed at improving adherence have been conducted in recent years, but the most effective interventions remain unclear. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and ranks of various interventions in enhancing adherence to exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation for post-PCI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A network meta-analysis employing random effects was utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of different interventions. Bias evaluation was performed via the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool, with data analysis performed using STATA v15.0. The surface under the cumulative ranking was used to estimate the rankings among different interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the final analysis, 30 RCTs with 4267 patients across 17 different interventions were included. The results showed that patients who received home-based cardiac rehabilitation combined with mobile health intervention had the best adherence to exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation (83.8%), followed by hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation combined with mobile health intervention (79.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This network meta-analysis identified home-based CR + mobile health intervention and hospital-based CR + mobile health intervention as the top two ranked interventions for improving adherence to exercise-based phase II CR in post-PCI patients. Healthcare providers may consider prioritizing the use of home-based cardiac rehabilitation combined with mobile health intervention in clinical practice, but still need to evaluate factors such as patient preference and Medicare reimbursement availability to develop customized interventions that are not only safe and effective but also satisfying to the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":"897"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02561-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation is critical for post-PCI patients, but adherence to exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation remains low. Many studies aimed at improving adherence have been conducted in recent years, but the most effective interventions remain unclear. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and ranks of various interventions in enhancing adherence to exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation for post-PCI patients.

Methods: A network meta-analysis employing random effects was utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of different interventions. Bias evaluation was performed via the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool, with data analysis performed using STATA v15.0. The surface under the cumulative ranking was used to estimate the rankings among different interventions.

Results: In the final analysis, 30 RCTs with 4267 patients across 17 different interventions were included. The results showed that patients who received home-based cardiac rehabilitation combined with mobile health intervention had the best adherence to exercise-based phase II cardiac rehabilitation (83.8%), followed by hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation combined with mobile health intervention (79.9%).

Conclusions: This network meta-analysis identified home-based CR + mobile health intervention and hospital-based CR + mobile health intervention as the top two ranked interventions for improving adherence to exercise-based phase II CR in post-PCI patients. Healthcare providers may consider prioritizing the use of home-based cardiac rehabilitation combined with mobile health intervention in clinical practice, but still need to evaluate factors such as patient preference and Medicare reimbursement availability to develop customized interventions that are not only safe and effective but also satisfying to the patient.

不同干预措施对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者坚持基于运动的CR的比较效果:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
背景:基于运动的II期心脏康复对pci术后患者至关重要,但坚持基于运动的II期心脏康复的程度仍然很低。近年来进行了许多旨在提高依从性的研究,但最有效的干预措施仍不清楚。因此,本研究的目的是评估各种干预措施的有效性和等级,以增强pci后患者对基于运动的II期心脏康复的依从性。方法:采用随机效应的网络元分析来评价不同干预措施的有效性。偏倚评价采用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具,数据分析采用STATA v15.0。利用累积排名下的面来估计不同干预措施之间的排名。结果:在最终的分析中,纳入了30项随机对照试验,涉及4267名患者,涉及17种不同的干预措施。结果显示,接受以家庭为基础的心脏康复联合移动健康干预的患者对以运动为基础的二期心脏康复的依从性最好(83.8%),其次是以医院为基础的心脏康复联合移动健康干预(79.9%)。结论:该网络荟萃分析确定,基于家庭的CR +移动健康干预和基于医院的CR +移动健康干预是改善pci后患者对基于运动的II期CR的依从性的前两种干预措施。医疗保健提供者可以考虑在临床实践中优先使用基于家庭的心脏康复结合移动健康干预,但仍需要评估患者偏好和医疗保险可报销性等因素,以制定定制的干预措施,不仅安全有效,而且让患者满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信