Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC-C) scale in nursing inters: a psychometric analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Qin Qin, Luqing Zheng, Le Chen, Yang Yang, Huifang Li, Jingjing Wang, Linan Cheng, Noorsuzana Mohd Shariff
{"title":"Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC-C) scale in nursing inters: a psychometric analysis.","authors":"Qin Qin, Luqing Zheng, Le Chen, Yang Yang, Huifang Li, Jingjing Wang, Linan Cheng, Noorsuzana Mohd Shariff","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02612-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing interns, the future nurses, often find it challenging to interact with trauma survivors due to their lack of experience and training. Assessing their attitudes and knowledge in trauma-informed care can improve their clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To culturally adapt and assess the reliability and validity of the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care Scale in Chinese nursing interns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The translation of Attitudes Related to the Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC) Scale followed guidelines for the cross-cultural adaptation process. A survey was conducted with 490 nursing interns from two colleges in China in February and May 2024, and seven experts evaluated the content equivalence of each item. Reliability and validity were assessed using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chinese version of the ARTIC-C retained 35 items and demonstrated high content validity. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 6-factor structure, explaining 61.887% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 6-factor model adequately represented the scale structure: chi-square/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF) = 1.544, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.045, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.969, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.969, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.966, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.046. The scale had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.916 and test-retest reliability of 0.876.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Chinese version of the ARTIC-C scale has demonstrated strong reliability and validity, making it an effective tool for measuring Chinese nursing interns' attitudes and knowledge regarding trauma-informed care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":"915"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656957/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02612-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nursing interns, the future nurses, often find it challenging to interact with trauma survivors due to their lack of experience and training. Assessing their attitudes and knowledge in trauma-informed care can improve their clinical performance.

Objective: To culturally adapt and assess the reliability and validity of the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care Scale in Chinese nursing interns.

Design: Quantitative cross-sectional design.

Methods: The translation of Attitudes Related to the Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC) Scale followed guidelines for the cross-cultural adaptation process. A survey was conducted with 490 nursing interns from two colleges in China in February and May 2024, and seven experts evaluated the content equivalence of each item. Reliability and validity were assessed using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability, and test-retest reliability.

Results: The Chinese version of the ARTIC-C retained 35 items and demonstrated high content validity. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 6-factor structure, explaining 61.887% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the 6-factor model adequately represented the scale structure: chi-square/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF) = 1.544, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.045, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.969, incremental fit index (IFI) = 0.969, Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.966, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.046. The scale had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.916 and test-retest reliability of 0.876.

Conclusions: The Chinese version of the ARTIC-C scale has demonstrated strong reliability and validity, making it an effective tool for measuring Chinese nursing interns' attitudes and knowledge regarding trauma-informed care.

护理人员创伤知情护理态度(articc)量表中文版的翻译与验证:一项心理测量分析。
背景:实习护士,即未来的护士,由于缺乏经验和培训,常常发现与创伤幸存者互动是一项挑战。评估他们对创伤知情护理的态度和知识可以提高他们的临床表现。目的:探讨中国护理实习生创伤知情护理态度量表的文化适应性和信度效度。设计:定量横断面设计。方法:参照跨文化适应过程指南,对创伤知情照护态度量表进行翻译。于2024年2月和5月,对国内两所高校的490名实习护士进行了问卷调查,并由7位专家对每个项目的内容等价性进行了评估。信度和效度评估采用项目分析、探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析、内部一致性信度和重测信度。结果:中文版本的articc保留了35个条目,具有较高的内容效度。探索性因子分析显示为6因子结构,解释总方差的61.887%。验证性因子分析表明,6因素模型充分表征了量表结构:卡方/自由度(CMIN/DF) = 1.544,近似均方根误差(RMSEA) = 0.045,比较拟合指数(CFI) = 0.969,增量拟合指数(IFI) = 0.969, Tucker Lewis指数(TLI) = 0.966,标准化均方根残差(SRMR) = 0.046。量表的Cronbach's alpha为0.916,重测信度为0.876。结论:中文版的articc量表具有较强的信度和效度,是衡量中国护理实习生创伤知情护理态度和知识的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信