"1-800-Help-Me-With-Open-Science-Stuff": A Qualitative Examination of Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Danika L Pfeiffer, Austin Thompson, Brittany Ciullo, Micah E Hirsch, Mariam El Amin, Andrea Ford, Jessica Riccardi, Elaine Kearney
{"title":"\"1-800-Help-Me-With-Open-Science-Stuff\": A Qualitative Examination of Open Science Practices in Communication Sciences and Disorders.","authors":"Danika L Pfeiffer, Austin Thompson, Brittany Ciullo, Micah E Hirsch, Mariam El Amin, Andrea Ford, Jessica Riccardi, Elaine Kearney","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the perceptions of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) assistant professors in the United States related to barriers and facilitators to engaging in open science practices and identify opportunities for improving open science training and support in the field.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Thirty-five assistant professors (16 from very high research activity [R1] institutions, 19 from institutions with other Carnegie classifications) participated in one 1-hr virtual focus group conducted via Zoom recording technology. The researchers used a conventional content analysis approach to analyze the focus group data and develop categories from the discussions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five categories were developed from the focus groups: (a) a desire to learn about open science through opportunities for independent learning and learning with peers; (b) perceived benefits of engaging in open science on assistant professors' careers, the broader scientific community, and the quality of research in the field of CSD; (c) personal factors that act as barriers and/or facilitators to engaging in open science practices; (d) systemic factors that act as barriers and/or facilitators to engaging in open science practices; and (e) differences in perceptions of R1 and non-R1 assistant professors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assistant professors in CSD perceive benefits of open science for their careers, the scientific community, and the field. However, they face many barriers (e.g., time, lack of knowledge and training), which impede their engagement in open science practices. Preliminary recommendations for CSD assistant professors, academic institutions, publishers, and funding agencies are provided to reduce barriers to engagement in open science practices.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27996839.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"105-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00378","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the perceptions of communication sciences and disorders (CSD) assistant professors in the United States related to barriers and facilitators to engaging in open science practices and identify opportunities for improving open science training and support in the field.

Method: Thirty-five assistant professors (16 from very high research activity [R1] institutions, 19 from institutions with other Carnegie classifications) participated in one 1-hr virtual focus group conducted via Zoom recording technology. The researchers used a conventional content analysis approach to analyze the focus group data and develop categories from the discussions.

Results: Five categories were developed from the focus groups: (a) a desire to learn about open science through opportunities for independent learning and learning with peers; (b) perceived benefits of engaging in open science on assistant professors' careers, the broader scientific community, and the quality of research in the field of CSD; (c) personal factors that act as barriers and/or facilitators to engaging in open science practices; (d) systemic factors that act as barriers and/or facilitators to engaging in open science practices; and (e) differences in perceptions of R1 and non-R1 assistant professors.

Conclusions: Assistant professors in CSD perceive benefits of open science for their careers, the scientific community, and the field. However, they face many barriers (e.g., time, lack of knowledge and training), which impede their engagement in open science practices. Preliminary recommendations for CSD assistant professors, academic institutions, publishers, and funding agencies are provided to reduce barriers to engagement in open science practices.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27996839.

“1-800- help - me -Open-Science- stuff”:对交流科学和障碍中开放科学实践的定性考察。
目的:本定性研究的目的是考察美国交流科学和障碍(CSD)助理教授对参与开放科学实践的障碍和促进因素的看法,并确定在该领域改进开放科学培训和支持的机会。方法:35位助理教授(16位来自非常高的研究活动[R1]机构,19位来自其他卡内基分类机构)通过Zoom录音技术参与了一个1小时的虚拟焦点小组。研究人员使用传统的内容分析方法来分析焦点小组数据,并从讨论中开发类别。结果:从焦点小组中发展出五个类别:(a)通过独立学习和与同伴一起学习的机会学习开放科学的愿望;(b)从事开放科学对助理教授的职业生涯、更广泛的科学界,以及惩教署范畴内的研究质素的好处;(c)阻碍和/或促进参与开放科学实践的个人因素;(d)阻碍和/或促进参与开放科学实践的系统性因素;(e) R1和非R1助理教授的认知差异。结论:CSD的助理教授认为开放科学对他们的职业生涯、科学界和该领域都有好处。然而,他们面临着许多障碍(例如,时间、缺乏知识和培训),这阻碍了他们参与开放科学实践。为CSD助理教授、学术机构、出版商和资助机构提供了初步建议,以减少参与开放科学实践的障碍。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27996839。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
19.20%
发文量
538
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信