Development and validation of attitudes toward inclusive education scale among Chinese normal universities students' attitudes.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jin-Liang Ding, You-Juan Hong
{"title":"Development and validation of attitudes toward inclusive education scale among Chinese normal universities students' attitudes.","authors":"Jin-Liang Ding, You-Juan Hong","doi":"10.1186/s40359-024-02267-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Inclusive education plays a crucial role in integrating students with special educational needs (SEN) into mainstream schools, where the attitudes of pre-service teachers are pivotal. Despite recognizing the significance of these attitudes, there is currently a gap in understanding the perspectives of students attending normal universities in China regarding inclusive education practices. This study aims to bridge this gap by creating the Chinese version of the Normal Universities Students' Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education Scale (NUSATIES) and examining its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the context of China, this study validated and assessed the reliability of the Chinese adaptation of the NUSATIES among a sample of 4,091 students from normal universities. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to confirm the scale's structural integrity, discriminant validity, and convergent validity. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability (CR) were used to evaluate the scale's internal consistency and reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicated that the Chinese version of the NUSATIES possessed robust validity and reliability, which comprises three factors (i.e., cognitive, affective, and behavioral intention). The findings revealed that normal university students' attitudes significantly varied based on specialty; students specializing in special education exhibited more positive attitudes towards inclusive education than those in general education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that the scale is effective in measuring attitudes toward inclusive education in Chinese-speaking countries. This study significantly contributes to the field by emphasizing the importance of positive attitudes among normal university students in fostering inclusive education and by offering a validated tool for assessing these attitudes.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"12 1","pages":"753"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02267-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Inclusive education plays a crucial role in integrating students with special educational needs (SEN) into mainstream schools, where the attitudes of pre-service teachers are pivotal. Despite recognizing the significance of these attitudes, there is currently a gap in understanding the perspectives of students attending normal universities in China regarding inclusive education practices. This study aims to bridge this gap by creating the Chinese version of the Normal Universities Students' Attitudes Toward Inclusive Education Scale (NUSATIES) and examining its psychometric properties.

Methods: In the context of China, this study validated and assessed the reliability of the Chinese adaptation of the NUSATIES among a sample of 4,091 students from normal universities. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to confirm the scale's structural integrity, discriminant validity, and convergent validity. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability (CR) were used to evaluate the scale's internal consistency and reliability.

Results: The findings indicated that the Chinese version of the NUSATIES possessed robust validity and reliability, which comprises three factors (i.e., cognitive, affective, and behavioral intention). The findings revealed that normal university students' attitudes significantly varied based on specialty; students specializing in special education exhibited more positive attitudes towards inclusive education than those in general education.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that the scale is effective in measuring attitudes toward inclusive education in Chinese-speaking countries. This study significantly contributes to the field by emphasizing the importance of positive attitudes among normal university students in fostering inclusive education and by offering a validated tool for assessing these attitudes.

中国师范生对全纳教育态度量表的开发与验证。
目的:全纳教育在特殊教育需要学生融入主流学校中起着至关重要的作用,其中职前教师的态度至关重要。尽管认识到这些态度的重要性,但目前在理解中国师范大学学生对全纳教育实践的看法方面存在差距。本研究拟编制《师范生全纳教育态度量表》(NUSATIES)中文版,并考察其心理测量特征,以弥补这一差距。方法:在中国背景下,以4091名师范院校学生为样本,对NUSATIES中文适应性的信度进行验证和评估。采用验证性因子分析(CFA)验证量表的结构完整性、判别效度和收敛效度。此外,采用Cronbach's alpha和复合信度(CR)来评估量表的内部一致性和信度。结果:研究结果表明,中文版的NUSATIES量表具有较强的效度和信度,信度和信度包括认知意向、情感意向和行为意向三个因素。调查结果显示,师范生的态度因专业的不同而有显著差异;特殊教育专业学生对全纳教育的态度比普通教育专业学生更积极。结论:本量表能有效测量华语国家学生对全纳教育的态度。本研究强调了师范生积极态度在促进全纳教育中的重要性,并提供了一种有效的评估这些态度的工具,从而对该领域做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信