[Comparative study on effectiveness of injecting platelet-rich plasma with different concentrations of leukocytes under ultrasound in treatment of supraspinatus tendon injury].

Q3 Medicine
Xu Li, Jun Li, Ying Dai, Xiaoju Guo, Yongqing Xu, Yongzheng Gu, Qilin Zhao
{"title":"[Comparative study on effectiveness of injecting platelet-rich plasma with different concentrations of leukocytes under ultrasound in treatment of supraspinatus tendon injury].","authors":"Xu Li, Jun Li, Ying Dai, Xiaoju Guo, Yongqing Xu, Yongzheng Gu, Qilin Zhao","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202408094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare effectiveness of injecting platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with different concentrations of leukocytes under ultrasound in treatment of supraspinatus tendon injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical data of 30 patients with supraspinatus tendon injury, who met the selection criteria and were admitted between December 2022 and December 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. Thirty patients were treated with 4 injections of leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP, <i>n</i>=10), leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP, <i>n</i>=11), and triamcinolone ( <i>n</i>=9), with an interval of 7-10 days between each injection. There was no significant difference between groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05) in the age, gender, disease duration, affected shoulder side, Ellman classification, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constant score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. At 1, 3, and 6 months after injection, the shoulder pain and function were evaluated by using the VAS score, Constant score, DASH score, and ASES score. MRI was conducted to observe supraspinatus tendon healing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No severe adverse reactions was observed in all groups. All patients were followed up 6-7 months, with an average of 6.5 months. After injection, the ASES score and Constant score gradually increased in the LR-PRP group and LP-PRP group, while the VAS score and DASH score decreased, with significant differences compared to before injection ( <i>P</i><0.05). Except for no significant difference between 3 and 6 months after injection in LR-PRP group ( <i>P</i>>0.05), the above scores showed significant differences between different time points ( <i>P</i><0.05). At 1 month after injection, the Constant score in triamcinolone group significantly increased compared to before injection, while the VAS score significantly decreased ( <i>P<</i>0.05). There was no significant difference in all scores between other time points in the triamcinolone group ( <i>P</i>>0.05). Except for 1 month after injection, there was no significant difference in Constant score and VAS score between groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). At all other time points, the LR-PRP group and LP-PRP group had better scores than the triamcinolone group ( <i>P</i><0.05). There was no significant difference between the LR-PRP group and the LP-PRP group ( <i>P</i>>0.05). MRI showed that only 4 patients in the LP-PRP group had signs of repair at the supraspinatus tendon injury site at 6 months after injection, while no significant tendon repair sign was observed in the other patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with triamcinolone treatment, multiple injections of LP-PRP and LR-PRP under ultrasound can promote the recovery of shoulder joint function and significantly relieve pain in patients with supraspinatus tendon injury, and imaging improvement can be seen after LP-PRP treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"38 12","pages":"1445-1450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202408094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare effectiveness of injecting platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with different concentrations of leukocytes under ultrasound in treatment of supraspinatus tendon injury.

Methods: A clinical data of 30 patients with supraspinatus tendon injury, who met the selection criteria and were admitted between December 2022 and December 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. Thirty patients were treated with 4 injections of leukocyte-poor PRP (LP-PRP, n=10), leukocyte-rich PRP (LR-PRP, n=11), and triamcinolone ( n=9), with an interval of 7-10 days between each injection. There was no significant difference between groups ( P>0.05) in the age, gender, disease duration, affected shoulder side, Ellman classification, preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Constant score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. At 1, 3, and 6 months after injection, the shoulder pain and function were evaluated by using the VAS score, Constant score, DASH score, and ASES score. MRI was conducted to observe supraspinatus tendon healing.

Results: No severe adverse reactions was observed in all groups. All patients were followed up 6-7 months, with an average of 6.5 months. After injection, the ASES score and Constant score gradually increased in the LR-PRP group and LP-PRP group, while the VAS score and DASH score decreased, with significant differences compared to before injection ( P<0.05). Except for no significant difference between 3 and 6 months after injection in LR-PRP group ( P>0.05), the above scores showed significant differences between different time points ( P<0.05). At 1 month after injection, the Constant score in triamcinolone group significantly increased compared to before injection, while the VAS score significantly decreased ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in all scores between other time points in the triamcinolone group ( P>0.05). Except for 1 month after injection, there was no significant difference in Constant score and VAS score between groups ( P>0.05). At all other time points, the LR-PRP group and LP-PRP group had better scores than the triamcinolone group ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the LR-PRP group and the LP-PRP group ( P>0.05). MRI showed that only 4 patients in the LP-PRP group had signs of repair at the supraspinatus tendon injury site at 6 months after injection, while no significant tendon repair sign was observed in the other patients.

Conclusion: Compared with triamcinolone treatment, multiple injections of LP-PRP and LR-PRP under ultrasound can promote the recovery of shoulder joint function and significantly relieve pain in patients with supraspinatus tendon injury, and imaging improvement can be seen after LP-PRP treatment.

【超声下注射不同浓度白细胞富血小板血浆治疗冈上肌腱损伤的疗效比较研究】。
目的:比较超声下注射不同浓度白细胞富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗冈上肌腱损伤的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2022年12月至2023年12月收治的30例符合入选标准的冈上肌腱损伤患者的临床资料。30例患者接受4次低白细胞PRP (LP-PRP, n=10)、高白细胞PRP (LR-PRP, n=11)和曲安奈德(n=9)注射,每次注射间隔7-10天。两组患者的年龄、性别、病程、患肩侧、Ellman分型、术前视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、Constant评分、臂、肩、手残疾(DASH)评分、American shoulder and肘部外科医生(ASES)评分差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。注射后1、3、6个月,采用VAS评分、Constant评分、DASH评分、as评分评价患者肩关节疼痛及功能。MRI观察冈上肌腱愈合情况。结果:各组均未见严重不良反应。随访6 ~ 7个月,平均6.5个月。注射后,LR-PRP组和LP-PRP组患者的ASES评分和Constant评分逐渐升高,VAS评分和DASH评分逐渐降低,与注射前比较差异均有统计学意义(PP < 0.05),上述评分在不同时间点间差异均有统计学意义(PP0.05)。曲安奈德组其他时间点间各项评分差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。除注射后1个月外,各组患者的Constant评分和VAS评分差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在其他各时间点,LR-PRP组和LP-PRP组的评分均高于曲安奈德组(p < 0.05)。MRI显示,LP-PRP组仅4例患者在注射后6个月冈上肌腱损伤部位出现修复迹象,其余患者未见明显的肌腱修复迹象。结论:与曲安奈德治疗相比,超声下多次注射LP-PRP及LR-PRP可促进冈上肌腱损伤患者肩关节功能恢复,疼痛明显减轻,且LP-PRP治疗后影像学改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信