Improving first responders' perceptions of overdose events and survivors through tailored occupational health-focused training co-facilitated by overdose survivors.

IF 3 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Rachel Winograd, Phillip L Marotta, Meghan M O'Neil, Saad Siddiqui, Elizabeth Connors, Anna La Manna, Jeremiah Goulka, Leo Beletsky
{"title":"Improving first responders' perceptions of overdose events and survivors through tailored occupational health-focused training co-facilitated by overdose survivors.","authors":"Rachel Winograd, Phillip L Marotta, Meghan M O'Neil, Saad Siddiqui, Elizabeth Connors, Anna La Manna, Jeremiah Goulka, Leo Beletsky","doi":"10.1186/s40352-024-00309-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First responders (law enforcement officers, emergency medical services, and firefighters) frequently interact with people who use drugs (PWUD). Based on the nature and outcomes of such encounters, these interactions have the potential either to reduce harm, or perpetuate it. Given increased funding and attention for first responder-led interventions involving PWUD, we must identify the most critical training for improving negative beliefs about these interventions and populations. In this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate a novel, evidence-based first responder training with an occupational wellness framing aiming to increase knowledge regarding and improve attitudes toward people who overdose and toward the overdose antidote, naloxone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed and evaluated the DOTS/SHIELD (Drug Overdose Trust & Safety/Safety & Health Integration in the Enforcement of Laws on Drugs) first responder training with three components: (1) matched first responder and overdose survivor trainers; (2) locally tailored substance use service information and practical referral instructions; and (3) occupational health content designed to make first responders' jobs easier and safer. We conducted pre- and post-tests at 151 Missouri-based trainings (December 2020-May 2023) to assess associated attitudinal changes among law enforcement vs. emergency medical services [EMS]/fire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the matched sample (N = 1,003, 53.9% law enforcement), post-training attitudes toward people who overdose and toward naloxone were more positive than pre-training attitudes. On average, law enforcement held worse attitudes than EMS/fire toward people who overdose, though there were no professional differences in naloxone-related beliefs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This training approach effectively combines three training components - peer trainers, practical substance use service referral information, and an occupational wellness framing - to positively influence first responders' views toward those who use drugs and toward naloxone.</p>","PeriodicalId":37843,"journal":{"name":"Health and Justice","volume":"12 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-024-00309-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: First responders (law enforcement officers, emergency medical services, and firefighters) frequently interact with people who use drugs (PWUD). Based on the nature and outcomes of such encounters, these interactions have the potential either to reduce harm, or perpetuate it. Given increased funding and attention for first responder-led interventions involving PWUD, we must identify the most critical training for improving negative beliefs about these interventions and populations. In this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate a novel, evidence-based first responder training with an occupational wellness framing aiming to increase knowledge regarding and improve attitudes toward people who overdose and toward the overdose antidote, naloxone.

Methods: We developed and evaluated the DOTS/SHIELD (Drug Overdose Trust & Safety/Safety & Health Integration in the Enforcement of Laws on Drugs) first responder training with three components: (1) matched first responder and overdose survivor trainers; (2) locally tailored substance use service information and practical referral instructions; and (3) occupational health content designed to make first responders' jobs easier and safer. We conducted pre- and post-tests at 151 Missouri-based trainings (December 2020-May 2023) to assess associated attitudinal changes among law enforcement vs. emergency medical services [EMS]/fire.

Results: Among the matched sample (N = 1,003, 53.9% law enforcement), post-training attitudes toward people who overdose and toward naloxone were more positive than pre-training attitudes. On average, law enforcement held worse attitudes than EMS/fire toward people who overdose, though there were no professional differences in naloxone-related beliefs.

Conclusions: This training approach effectively combines three training components - peer trainers, practical substance use service referral information, and an occupational wellness framing - to positively influence first responders' views toward those who use drugs and toward naloxone.

通过与服药过量幸存者共同促进的以职业健康为重点的量身定制培训,改善急救人员对服药过量事件和幸存者的认识。
背景:第一响应者(执法人员、紧急医疗服务和消防员)经常与吸毒者互动(PWUD)。根据这种接触的性质和结果,这些互动可能会减少伤害,也可能会使伤害持续下去。鉴于对第一反应者主导的涉及puwud的干预措施的资金和关注有所增加,我们必须确定最关键的培训,以改善对这些干预措施和人群的负面看法。在本研究中,我们旨在开发和评估一种新颖的、以证据为基础的第一响应者培训,该培训具有职业健康框架,旨在提高人们对过量服用药物者和过量服用解毒剂纳洛酮的认识和态度。方法:我们开发和评估DOTS/SHIELD(药物过量信任与安全/药物执法安全与健康一体化)第一反应者培训,包括三个组成部分:(1)匹配第一反应者和过量幸存者培训师;(2)当地量身定制的物质使用服务信息和实用的转诊指导;(3)职业健康内容设计,使急救人员的工作更容易和更安全。我们对151次密苏里州培训(2020年12月至2023年5月)进行了前后测试,以评估执法部门与紧急医疗服务[EMS]/火灾之间相关的态度变化。结果:在匹配样本中(N = 1003,执法人员占53.9%),培训后对药物过量者和纳洛酮的态度比培训前更积极。平均而言,执法部门对过量服用药物的人的态度比EMS/fire更糟糕,尽管在纳洛酮相关的信念上没有专业差异。结论:这种培训方法有效地结合了三个培训组成部分——同伴培训师、实际物质使用服务转介信息和职业健康框架——积极影响了急救人员对吸毒者和纳洛酮的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health and Justice
Health and Justice Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health & Justice is open to submissions from public health, criminology and criminal justice, medical science, psychology and clinical sciences, sociology, neuroscience, biology, anthropology and the social sciences, and covers a broad array of research types. It publishes original research, research notes (promising issues that are smaller in scope), commentaries, and translational notes (possible ways of introducing innovations in the justice system). Health & Justice aims to: Present original experimental research on the area of health and well-being of people involved in the adult or juvenile justice system, including people who work in the system; Present meta-analysis or systematic reviews in the area of health and justice for those involved in the justice system; Provide an arena to present new and upcoming scientific issues; Present translational science—the movement of scientific findings into practice including programs, procedures, or strategies; Present implementation science findings to advance the uptake and use of evidence-based practices; and, Present protocols and clinical practice guidelines. As an open access journal, Health & Justice aims for a broad reach, including researchers across many disciplines as well as justice practitioners (e.g. judges, prosecutors, defenders, probation officers, treatment providers, mental health and medical personnel working with justice-involved individuals, etc.). The sections of the journal devoted to translational and implementation sciences are primarily geared to practitioners and justice actors with special attention to the techniques used.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信