Evolution of Eligibility Criteria in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Trials: A Clinical Trial Databank Analysis.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
United European Gastroenterology Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1002/ueg2.12731
An Outtier, Rosanne Janssens, Liese Barbier, João Sabino, Bram Verstockt, Séverine Vermeire, Isabelle Huys, Marc Ferrante
{"title":"Evolution of Eligibility Criteria in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Trials: A Clinical Trial Databank Analysis.","authors":"An Outtier, Rosanne Janssens, Liese Barbier, João Sabino, Bram Verstockt, Séverine Vermeire, Isabelle Huys, Marc Ferrante","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.12731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eligibility criteria in clinical trials have been criticised for being overly restrictive without clinical justification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the types, evolution, and current status of eligibility criteria in clinical trials for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a clinical trial databank search on clinicaltrials.gov, and included all Phase 3 placebo-controlled randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) investigating biologics or small molecules as induction therapy for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Eligibility criteria were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine RCTs were identified between the year 2000 and 2022 (30 for CD and 29 for UC). The median (interquartile range) number of eligibility criteria was 44 (38-49), and did not significantly change over the studied time period (p = 0.26). Qualitative analysis showed that common patient populations, such as older patients, therapy refractory patients, patients with comorbidities, prior malignancies, unclassified IBD type, ulcerative proctitis, stricturing and fistulizing CD, as well as patients with an ostomy, were often excluded. Heterogeneity in eligibility criteria across the different IBD clinical trials was found, such as for disease activity measurement, dosage of concomitant medication, wash-out period of advanced therapies, and laboratory tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The median number of eligibility criteria for IBD RCTs did not significantly change over time. The eligibility criteria are however restrictive and complex, limiting the generalisability of efficacy and safety outcomes in daily practice when drugs are approved. Future research is needed to investigate the impact of broadening eligibility criteria to better encompass real-world practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"542-551"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12731","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Eligibility criteria in clinical trials have been criticised for being overly restrictive without clinical justification.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the types, evolution, and current status of eligibility criteria in clinical trials for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

Methods: We performed a clinical trial databank search on clinicaltrials.gov, and included all Phase 3 placebo-controlled randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) investigating biologics or small molecules as induction therapy for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Eligibility criteria were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Results: Fifty-nine RCTs were identified between the year 2000 and 2022 (30 for CD and 29 for UC). The median (interquartile range) number of eligibility criteria was 44 (38-49), and did not significantly change over the studied time period (p = 0.26). Qualitative analysis showed that common patient populations, such as older patients, therapy refractory patients, patients with comorbidities, prior malignancies, unclassified IBD type, ulcerative proctitis, stricturing and fistulizing CD, as well as patients with an ostomy, were often excluded. Heterogeneity in eligibility criteria across the different IBD clinical trials was found, such as for disease activity measurement, dosage of concomitant medication, wash-out period of advanced therapies, and laboratory tests.

Conclusion: The median number of eligibility criteria for IBD RCTs did not significantly change over time. The eligibility criteria are however restrictive and complex, limiting the generalisability of efficacy and safety outcomes in daily practice when drugs are approved. Future research is needed to investigate the impact of broadening eligibility criteria to better encompass real-world practice.

炎症性肠病临床试验资格标准的演变:临床试验数据库分析。
背景:临床试验的资格标准被批评为过于严格而没有临床依据。目的:我们旨在研究炎症性肠病(IBD)临床试验的类型、演变和资格标准的现状。方法:我们在clinicaltrials.gov网站上检索了临床试验数据库,并纳入了所有研究生物制剂或小分子作为诱导治疗中重度克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的3期安慰剂对照随机对照试验(rct)。对入选标准进行了定量和定性分析。结果:在2000年至2022年期间确定了59项随机对照试验(30项针对CD, 29项针对UC)。合格标准的中位数(四分位数间距)为44(38-49),在研究期间没有显著变化(p = 0.26)。定性分析显示,通常排除老年患者、治疗难治性患者、合并合并症患者、既往恶性肿瘤患者、未分类IBD类型患者、溃疡性直肠炎患者、狭窄和瘘管性CD患者以及造口患者等常见患者群体。发现不同IBD临床试验的资格标准存在异质性,例如疾病活动性测量、联合用药剂量、先进治疗的洗脱期和实验室检查。结论:IBD随机对照试验入选标准的中位数并未随时间发生显著变化。然而,资格标准是限制性和复杂的,限制了药物批准后在日常实践中疗效和安全性结果的普遍性。未来的研究需要调查扩大资格标准以更好地涵盖现实世界实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信