Influence of Training With Corrective Feedback Devices on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Acquisition and Retention: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

JMIR Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.2196/59720

Abel Nicolau, Inês Jorge, Pedro Vieira-Marques, Carla Sa-Couto

{"title":"Influence of Training With Corrective Feedback Devices on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Skills Acquisition and Retention: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Abel Nicolau, Inês Jorge, Pedro Vieira-Marques, Carla Sa-Couto","doi":"10.2196/59720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several studies related to the use of corrective feedback devices in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, with different populations, training methodologies, and equipment, present distinct results regarding the influence of this technology.Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of corrective feedback devices in cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills acquisition and retention for laypeople and health care professionals. Training duration was also studied.Methods: The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2015 to December 2023. Eligible randomized controlled trials compared technology-based training incorporating corrective feedback with standard training. Outcomes of interest were the quality of chest compression-related components. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. A meta-analysis was used to explore the heterogeneity of the selected studies.Results: In total, 20 studies were included. Overall, it was reported that corrective feedback devices used during training had a positive impact on both skills acquisition and retention. Medium to high heterogeneity was observed.Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that corrective feedback devices enhance skills acquisition and retention over time. Considering the medium to high heterogeneity observed, these findings should be interpreted with caution. More standardized, high-quality studies are needed.Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42021240953; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=240953.","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"10 ","pages":"e59720"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/59720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several studies related to the use of corrective feedback devices in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, with different populations, training methodologies, and equipment, present distinct results regarding the influence of this technology.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of corrective feedback devices in cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills acquisition and retention for laypeople and health care professionals. Training duration was also studied.

Methods: The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 2015 to December 2023. Eligible randomized controlled trials compared technology-based training incorporating corrective feedback with standard training. Outcomes of interest were the quality of chest compression-related components. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. A meta-analysis was used to explore the heterogeneity of the selected studies.

Results: In total, 20 studies were included. Overall, it was reported that corrective feedback devices used during training had a positive impact on both skills acquisition and retention. Medium to high heterogeneity was observed.

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that corrective feedback devices enhance skills acquisition and retention over time. Considering the medium to high heterogeneity observed, these findings should be interpreted with caution. More standardized, high-quality studies are needed.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42021240953; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=240953.

查看原文本刊更多论文

矫正反馈装置训练对心肺复苏技能习得和保留的影响：系统回顾和荟萃分析。

背景：几项关于在心肺复苏训练中使用纠正反馈装置的研究，针对不同的人群、训练方法和设备，得出了关于该技术影响的不同结果。目的：本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在研究纠正反馈装置对外行人和卫生保健专业人员心肺复苏技能习得和保留的影响。训练时间也进行了研究。方法：2015年1月- 2023年12月在PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus中进行检索。符合条件的随机对照试验比较了基于技术的结合纠正反馈的培训与标准培训。结果感兴趣的是胸按压相关成分的质量。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险。荟萃分析用于探讨所选研究的异质性。结果：共纳入20项研究。总的来说，据报道，在培训期间使用的纠正反馈装置对技能的获得和保留都有积极的影响。观察到中度至高度异质性。结论：本系统综述和荟萃分析表明，随着时间的推移，纠正反馈装置可以提高技能的习得和保留。考虑到观察到的中等到高度异质性，这些发现应该谨慎解释。需要更多标准化、高质量的研究。试验注册：PROSPERO CRD42021240953；https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=240953。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊