Desert ants avoid ambush predator pits depending on position, visual landmarks and trapped nestmates.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.241500
Adi Bar, Eden Raveh-Pal, Aziz Subach, Susanne Foitzik, Inon Scharf
{"title":"Desert ants avoid ambush predator pits depending on position, visual landmarks and trapped nestmates.","authors":"Adi Bar, Eden Raveh-Pal, Aziz Subach, Susanne Foitzik, Inon Scharf","doi":"10.1098/rsos.241500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central-place foragers face high predation risk when repeatedly using routes near their nest, as predators can learn to ambush them there. We investigated the factors influencing the likelihood of desert ant foragers falling into pitfall traps, simulating common predators such as antlions or spiders. We varied the spatial configuration of the pitfall traps, the presence of trapped nestmates and the availability of visual landmarks to study the workers' susceptibility to falling into pits and their foraging success. Our results showed that a zigzag configuration of pits led to the fewest workers reaching the food reward, compared with straight-line and right-angled-triangle configurations. Over successive runs, workers became more efficient, with fewer falls into pits and faster food discovery, suggesting they either learned the locations of the pits or became more cautious. In any case, the ants learned about important landscape features close to their nest and the best way of navigating around it. Additionally, we examined the impact of trapped nestmates and visual landmarks. We found that pits marked with visual landmarks resulted in fewer falls. However, pits containing trapped nestmates attracted more ants, impaired food discovery and increased falling rates into pits, thereby imposing a twofold cost on ant foragers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"11 12","pages":"241500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Central-place foragers face high predation risk when repeatedly using routes near their nest, as predators can learn to ambush them there. We investigated the factors influencing the likelihood of desert ant foragers falling into pitfall traps, simulating common predators such as antlions or spiders. We varied the spatial configuration of the pitfall traps, the presence of trapped nestmates and the availability of visual landmarks to study the workers' susceptibility to falling into pits and their foraging success. Our results showed that a zigzag configuration of pits led to the fewest workers reaching the food reward, compared with straight-line and right-angled-triangle configurations. Over successive runs, workers became more efficient, with fewer falls into pits and faster food discovery, suggesting they either learned the locations of the pits or became more cautious. In any case, the ants learned about important landscape features close to their nest and the best way of navigating around it. Additionally, we examined the impact of trapped nestmates and visual landmarks. We found that pits marked with visual landmarks resulted in fewer falls. However, pits containing trapped nestmates attracted more ants, impaired food discovery and increased falling rates into pits, thereby imposing a twofold cost on ant foragers.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信