Late Gadolinium Enhancement of Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy at 5.0 T versus 3.0 T: A Crossover Design Study.

IF 3.8 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xianling Qian, Shiyu Wang, Yali Wu, Xiyin Miao, Yinyin Chen, Hongfei Lu, Rui Wang, Dong Wang, Fang Wang, Shiyu Zhang, Jiaxin Hao, Hang Jin, Mengsu Zeng
{"title":"Late Gadolinium Enhancement of Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy at 5.0 T versus 3.0 T: A Crossover Design Study.","authors":"Xianling Qian, Shiyu Wang, Yali Wu, Xiyin Miao, Yinyin Chen, Hongfei Lu, Rui Wang, Dong Wang, Fang Wang, Shiyu Zhang, Jiaxin Hao, Hang Jin, Mengsu Zeng","doi":"10.1148/ryct.240035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To compare the acquisition time, image quality, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) visualization and quantification on phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) images using 5.0-T versus 3.0-T cardiac MRI. Materials and Methods In this prospective crossover study, 49 participants (mean ± SD age, 43.7 years ± 13.1; 39 men) suspected or diagnosed with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled from April 2023 to March 2024 and randomly assigned to group 1 (5.0-T followed by 3.0-T LGE cardiac MRI) or group 2 (3.0-T followed by 5.0-T LGE cardiac MRI). PSIR images were acquired at spatial resolutions of 1.2, 0.9, and 1.6 mm. Image quality and LGE were qualitatively evaluated using a five-point Likert scale by two readers, and signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and LGE mass were quantitatively assessed. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate interreader agreement. Results There was no evidence of a difference in the acquisition time for obtaining a single-layer PSIR image at 5.0 T compared with 3.0 T (<i>P</i> > .05 for all), irrespective of resolutions at 1.2, 0.9, and 1.6 mm. The 5.0-T PSIR images demonstrated better image quality and LGE visualization compared with 3.0-T images, particularly at 1.2 mm (image quality: median 5 [IQR, 5-5] vs median 5 [IQR, 4-5]; <i>P</i> = .004; LGE score: median 5 [IQR, 5-5] vs median 4.25 [IQR, 4-5]; <i>P</i> < .001). No evidence of differences in image quality or LGE scores was found between 5.0-T and 3.0-T cardiac MRI at 1.6-mm resolution. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were higher on 5.0-T PSIR images across all resolutions compared with 3.0-T images (<i>P</i> < .001 for all), but no evidence of a difference was found in LGE mass measurements. Conclusion The study demonstrates that 5.0-T PSIR imaging offers better image quality and LGE visualization than 3.0-T PSIR, particularly at a 1.2-mm resolution, in individuals with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. <b>Keywords:</b> MRI, Cardiac, Heart, Comparative Studies, Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy, Late Gadolinium Enhancement, Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> ©RSNA, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"6 6","pages":"e240035"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.240035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To compare the acquisition time, image quality, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) visualization and quantification on phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) images using 5.0-T versus 3.0-T cardiac MRI. Materials and Methods In this prospective crossover study, 49 participants (mean ± SD age, 43.7 years ± 13.1; 39 men) suspected or diagnosed with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled from April 2023 to March 2024 and randomly assigned to group 1 (5.0-T followed by 3.0-T LGE cardiac MRI) or group 2 (3.0-T followed by 5.0-T LGE cardiac MRI). PSIR images were acquired at spatial resolutions of 1.2, 0.9, and 1.6 mm. Image quality and LGE were qualitatively evaluated using a five-point Likert scale by two readers, and signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and LGE mass were quantitatively assessed. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate interreader agreement. Results There was no evidence of a difference in the acquisition time for obtaining a single-layer PSIR image at 5.0 T compared with 3.0 T (P > .05 for all), irrespective of resolutions at 1.2, 0.9, and 1.6 mm. The 5.0-T PSIR images demonstrated better image quality and LGE visualization compared with 3.0-T images, particularly at 1.2 mm (image quality: median 5 [IQR, 5-5] vs median 5 [IQR, 4-5]; P = .004; LGE score: median 5 [IQR, 5-5] vs median 4.25 [IQR, 4-5]; P < .001). No evidence of differences in image quality or LGE scores was found between 5.0-T and 3.0-T cardiac MRI at 1.6-mm resolution. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were higher on 5.0-T PSIR images across all resolutions compared with 3.0-T images (P < .001 for all), but no evidence of a difference was found in LGE mass measurements. Conclusion The study demonstrates that 5.0-T PSIR imaging offers better image quality and LGE visualization than 3.0-T PSIR, particularly at a 1.2-mm resolution, in individuals with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Keywords: MRI, Cardiac, Heart, Comparative Studies, Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy, Late Gadolinium Enhancement, Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery Supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2024.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信