Impact of Duration of Exposure to Intraretinal Fluid on Visual Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

IF 4.4 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Nathan C Steinle, April J McCullough, Fabiana Q Silva, Weiming Du, Hadi Moini, Rishi P Singh
{"title":"Impact of Duration of Exposure to Intraretinal Fluid on Visual Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.","authors":"Nathan C Steinle, April J McCullough, Fabiana Q Silva, Weiming Du, Hadi Moini, Rishi P Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2024.12.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of total duration of intraretinal fluid (IRF) exposure on visual acuity and vision-related quality of life in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A post hoc analysis of integrated data from the VIEW 1 and VIEW 2 trials.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with nAMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients receiving intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (Rq4) or intravitreal aflibercept injection 2 mg every 4 weeks (IAI 2q4) or every 8 weeks (IAI 2q8) were evaluated. Data were pooled across treatment groups, and the duration of IRF exposure was assessed by quartiles (Q1: ≤2 weeks; Q2: 3-≤8 weeks; Q3: 9≤18 weeks; Q4: >18 weeks). Changes from baseline in visual acuity and vision-related quality of life were evaluated by quartiles of duration of IRF exposure in the pooled treatment group and each treatment group.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Mean changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and improvement in vision-related quality of life as assessed via National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) composite and subscale scores at Week 52.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1804 patients were evaluated. In the pooled analysis, mean BCVA gains from baseline at Week 52 for Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 were +10.9, +10.1, +9.4, and +6.6 letters, respectively (LS mean difference Q4-Q1 [95%CI]; -4.3 [-6.1, -2.5]). Mean changes from baseline to Week 52 in VFQ-25 composite score for Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 were +5.9, +6.6, +6.1, and +4.0 points, respectively (-1.9 [-3.6, -0.2]). A similar trend was observed across VFQ-25 subscales, with patients in Q4 generally experiencing less improvement versus Q1. When BCVA gains were assessed by quartiles of duration of IRF exposure within each treatment group, mean BCVA gains for Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 were +11.0, +11.1, +9.3, and +5.8 letters for Rq4 (nominal P<0.05; Q4 vs. Q1); +10.7, +9.7, +9.2, and +7.7 letters for IAI 2q4; and +11.3, +11.2, +8.6, and +6.3 letters for IAI 2q8 (nominal P<0.05; Q4 vs. Q1), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing duration of IRF exposure was associated with lower visual gains and less improvement in vision-related quality of life in patients with nAMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2024.12.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of total duration of intraretinal fluid (IRF) exposure on visual acuity and vision-related quality of life in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Design: A post hoc analysis of integrated data from the VIEW 1 and VIEW 2 trials.

Participants: Patients with nAMD.

Methods: Patients receiving intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg every 4 weeks (Rq4) or intravitreal aflibercept injection 2 mg every 4 weeks (IAI 2q4) or every 8 weeks (IAI 2q8) were evaluated. Data were pooled across treatment groups, and the duration of IRF exposure was assessed by quartiles (Q1: ≤2 weeks; Q2: 3-≤8 weeks; Q3: 9≤18 weeks; Q4: >18 weeks). Changes from baseline in visual acuity and vision-related quality of life were evaluated by quartiles of duration of IRF exposure in the pooled treatment group and each treatment group.

Main outcome measures: Mean changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and improvement in vision-related quality of life as assessed via National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) composite and subscale scores at Week 52.

Results: A total of 1804 patients were evaluated. In the pooled analysis, mean BCVA gains from baseline at Week 52 for Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 were +10.9, +10.1, +9.4, and +6.6 letters, respectively (LS mean difference Q4-Q1 [95%CI]; -4.3 [-6.1, -2.5]). Mean changes from baseline to Week 52 in VFQ-25 composite score for Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 were +5.9, +6.6, +6.1, and +4.0 points, respectively (-1.9 [-3.6, -0.2]). A similar trend was observed across VFQ-25 subscales, with patients in Q4 generally experiencing less improvement versus Q1. When BCVA gains were assessed by quartiles of duration of IRF exposure within each treatment group, mean BCVA gains for Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 were +11.0, +11.1, +9.3, and +5.8 letters for Rq4 (nominal P<0.05; Q4 vs. Q1); +10.7, +9.7, +9.2, and +7.7 letters for IAI 2q4; and +11.3, +11.2, +8.6, and +6.3 letters for IAI 2q8 (nominal P<0.05; Q4 vs. Q1), respectively.

Conclusions: Increasing duration of IRF exposure was associated with lower visual gains and less improvement in vision-related quality of life in patients with nAMD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Retina
Ophthalmology. Retina Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
33 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信