Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Cervical Spine Fusion in Patients with Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.122534
Todd Lansford, Peter Campbell, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Marc Weinstein, Joshua Wind, Andrew Beaumont, Amir Vokshoor, Kristen Radcliff, Ilyas Aleem, Domagoj Coric
{"title":"Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Cervical Spine Fusion in Patients with Risk Factors for Pseudarthrosis.","authors":"Todd Lansford, Peter Campbell, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Marc Weinstein, Joshua Wind, Andrew Beaumont, Amir Vokshoor, Kristen Radcliff, Ilyas Aleem, Domagoj Coric","doi":"10.52965/001c.122534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Certain demographics and/or risk factors contribute to complications following cervical spinal surgery including pseudarthrosis, prolonged pain, and reduced quality of life (QoL). Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation is a non-invasive therapy that may enhance fusion success in at-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the safety and efficacy of post-operative adjunctive PEMF therapy following cervical spinal surgery in subjects at risk for pseudarthrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter study investigated PEMF as an adjunctive therapy to cervical spinal fusion procedures in subjects at risk for pseudarthrosis based on having at least one of the following: prior failed fusion, multi-level fusion, nicotine use, osteoporosis, or diabetes. Radiographic fusion status and patient-reported outcomes (SF-36, EQ5D, NDI, and VAS-arm pain and VAS-neck pain) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 160 subjects were assessed for fusion 12-months postoperative, and 144 subjects were successfully fused (90.0%). Fusion success for subjects with 1, 2+, or 3+ risk factors was 91.7%, 89.0%%, and 90.9%, respectively. Significant improvements in NDI, VAS-arm and VAS-neck were observed compared to baseline scores (p < 0.001) along with improvements in SF-36 and EQ5D (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjunctive treatment with PEMF provides a high rate of successful fusion and significant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life despite having risk factors for pseudarthrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"16 ","pages":"122534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.122534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Certain demographics and/or risk factors contribute to complications following cervical spinal surgery including pseudarthrosis, prolonged pain, and reduced quality of life (QoL). Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation is a non-invasive therapy that may enhance fusion success in at-risk patients.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of post-operative adjunctive PEMF therapy following cervical spinal surgery in subjects at risk for pseudarthrosis.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter study investigated PEMF as an adjunctive therapy to cervical spinal fusion procedures in subjects at risk for pseudarthrosis based on having at least one of the following: prior failed fusion, multi-level fusion, nicotine use, osteoporosis, or diabetes. Radiographic fusion status and patient-reported outcomes (SF-36, EQ5D, NDI, and VAS-arm pain and VAS-neck pain) were assessed.

Results: A total of 160 subjects were assessed for fusion 12-months postoperative, and 144 subjects were successfully fused (90.0%). Fusion success for subjects with 1, 2+, or 3+ risk factors was 91.7%, 89.0%%, and 90.9%, respectively. Significant improvements in NDI, VAS-arm and VAS-neck were observed compared to baseline scores (p < 0.001) along with improvements in SF-36 and EQ5D (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Adjunctive treatment with PEMF provides a high rate of successful fusion and significant improvements in pain, function, and quality of life despite having risk factors for pseudarthrosis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信