Pollen specialist bee species are accurately predicted from visitation, occurrence and phylogenetic data.

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Colleen Smith, Nick Bachelder, Avery L Russell, Vanessa Morales, Abilene R Mosher, Katja C Seltmann
{"title":"Pollen specialist bee species are accurately predicted from visitation, occurrence and phylogenetic data.","authors":"Colleen Smith, Nick Bachelder, Avery L Russell, Vanessa Morales, Abilene R Mosher, Katja C Seltmann","doi":"10.1007/s00442-024-05653-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An animal's diet breadth is a central aspect of its life history, yet the factors determining why some species have narrow dietary breadths (specialists) and others have broad dietary breadths (generalists) remain poorly understood. This challenge is pronounced in herbivorous insects due to incomplete host plant data across many taxa and regions. Here, we develop and validate machine learning models to predict pollen diet breadth in bees, using a bee phylogeny and occurrence data for 682 bee species native to the United States, aiming to better understand key drivers. We found that pollen specialist bees made an average of 72.9% of their visits to host plants and could be predicted with high accuracy (mean 94%). Our models predicted generalist bee species, which made up a minority of the species in our dataset, with lower accuracy (mean 70%). The models tested on spatially and phylogenetically blocked data revealed that the most informative predictors of diet breadth are plant phylogenetic diversity, bee species' geographic range, and regional abundance. Our findings also confirm that range size is predictive of diet breadth and that both male and female specialist bees mostly visit their host plants. Overall, our results suggest we can use visitation data to predict specialist bee species in regions and for taxonomic groups where diet breadth is unknown, though predicting generalists may be more challenging. These methods can thus enhance our understanding of plant-pollinator interactions, leading to improved conservation outcomes and a better understanding of the pollination services bees provide.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 1","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05653-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An animal's diet breadth is a central aspect of its life history, yet the factors determining why some species have narrow dietary breadths (specialists) and others have broad dietary breadths (generalists) remain poorly understood. This challenge is pronounced in herbivorous insects due to incomplete host plant data across many taxa and regions. Here, we develop and validate machine learning models to predict pollen diet breadth in bees, using a bee phylogeny and occurrence data for 682 bee species native to the United States, aiming to better understand key drivers. We found that pollen specialist bees made an average of 72.9% of their visits to host plants and could be predicted with high accuracy (mean 94%). Our models predicted generalist bee species, which made up a minority of the species in our dataset, with lower accuracy (mean 70%). The models tested on spatially and phylogenetically blocked data revealed that the most informative predictors of diet breadth are plant phylogenetic diversity, bee species' geographic range, and regional abundance. Our findings also confirm that range size is predictive of diet breadth and that both male and female specialist bees mostly visit their host plants. Overall, our results suggest we can use visitation data to predict specialist bee species in regions and for taxonomic groups where diet breadth is unknown, though predicting generalists may be more challenging. These methods can thus enhance our understanding of plant-pollinator interactions, leading to improved conservation outcomes and a better understanding of the pollination services bees provide.

花粉专科蜂种的准确预测从访问,发生和系统发育的数据。
动物的饮食宽度是其生活史的一个核心方面,然而,决定为什么一些物种的饮食宽度较窄(专门型)而另一些物种的饮食宽度较宽(通才型)的因素仍然知之甚少。由于许多分类群和地区的寄主植物数据不完整,这一挑战在食草昆虫中尤为明显。在这里,我们开发并验证了机器学习模型来预测蜜蜂的花粉饮食宽度,使用美国本土682种蜜蜂的蜜蜂系统发育和发生数据,旨在更好地了解关键驱动因素。我们发现,花粉专家蜜蜂对寄主植物的访问率平均为72.9%,预测准确率很高(平均为94%)。我们的模型预测了通才蜜蜂物种,这些物种在我们的数据集中占少数,准确率较低(平均70%)。在空间和系统发育阻断数据上测试的模型显示,植物系统发育多样性、蜜蜂物种的地理范围和区域丰度是最具信息量的食性宽度预测因子。我们的研究结果还证实,范围的大小可以预测饮食的广度,而且雄性和雌性的专业蜜蜂都主要访问它们的寄主植物。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,我们可以使用访问数据来预测饮食广度未知的地区和分类群体的专业蜜蜂物种,尽管预测通才可能更具挑战性。因此,这些方法可以增强我们对植物与传粉者相互作用的理解,从而改善保护结果,更好地了解蜜蜂提供的授粉服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信