Comparative analysis of MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score for predicting cage subsidence in PILF surgery.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Fan Zhang, Jie Liang, Dawei Shi, Can Tuo, Yu Wu, Zijian Yang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score for predicting cage subsidence in PILF surgery.","authors":"Fan Zhang, Jie Liang, Dawei Shi, Can Tuo, Yu Wu, Zijian Yang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05332-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>As lumbar degenerative diseases become more prevalent in an aging population, there is an increasing demand for surgical interventions, such as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, cage subsidence (CS), observed in 23.9-54% of cases postoperatively, remains a significant complication. Several factors, including age, bone quality, and endplate damage, contribute to the risk of CS, with bone quality being among the most critical determinants. Although DEXA and QCT are widely employed to assess bone density, their routine use in preoperative evaluations is restricted by cost considerations and radiation exposure. Recent studies suggest that MRI-based vertebral body quality (VBQ) and endplate bone quality (EBQ) score offer a viable, non-invasive alternative for evaluating bone quality; however, there is limited research comparing their predictive value for CS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 165 patients undergoing single-level PLIF surgery were included. MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score were calculated using T1-weighted images, and preoperative QCT was employed as a clinical standard. Cage subsidence was assessed based on postoperative imaging at 12-month follow-up. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, chi-square tests, and ROC curve analyses, were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of VBQ and EBQ for CS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study's findings demonstrated that both VBQ and EBQ scores were significantly correlated with QCT measurements, thereby validating their utility as indicators of bone quality. ROC analysis revealed that VBQ had superior predictive value for CS (AUC = 0.814) compared to EBQ (AUC = 0.719), with both scores demonstrating significant clinical utility in identifying patients at risk for CS. Notably, VBQ exhibited a stronger correlation with preoperative clinical outcomes compared to EBQ, underscoring its greater reliability as a predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the effectiveness of MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score as practical, non-invasive tools for assessing bone quality preoperatively, with VBQ demonstrating superior predictive performance for CS risk. The findings underscore the potential of integrating these MRI-based assessments into routine preoperative planning to improve patient outcomes and minimize complications associated with PLIF surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05332-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: As lumbar degenerative diseases become more prevalent in an aging population, there is an increasing demand for surgical interventions, such as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, cage subsidence (CS), observed in 23.9-54% of cases postoperatively, remains a significant complication. Several factors, including age, bone quality, and endplate damage, contribute to the risk of CS, with bone quality being among the most critical determinants. Although DEXA and QCT are widely employed to assess bone density, their routine use in preoperative evaluations is restricted by cost considerations and radiation exposure. Recent studies suggest that MRI-based vertebral body quality (VBQ) and endplate bone quality (EBQ) score offer a viable, non-invasive alternative for evaluating bone quality; however, there is limited research comparing their predictive value for CS.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 165 patients undergoing single-level PLIF surgery were included. MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score were calculated using T1-weighted images, and preoperative QCT was employed as a clinical standard. Cage subsidence was assessed based on postoperative imaging at 12-month follow-up. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, chi-square tests, and ROC curve analyses, were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of VBQ and EBQ for CS.

Results: The study's findings demonstrated that both VBQ and EBQ scores were significantly correlated with QCT measurements, thereby validating their utility as indicators of bone quality. ROC analysis revealed that VBQ had superior predictive value for CS (AUC = 0.814) compared to EBQ (AUC = 0.719), with both scores demonstrating significant clinical utility in identifying patients at risk for CS. Notably, VBQ exhibited a stronger correlation with preoperative clinical outcomes compared to EBQ, underscoring its greater reliability as a predictor.

Conclusions: This study highlights the effectiveness of MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score as practical, non-invasive tools for assessing bone quality preoperatively, with VBQ demonstrating superior predictive performance for CS risk. The findings underscore the potential of integrating these MRI-based assessments into routine preoperative planning to improve patient outcomes and minimize complications associated with PLIF surgery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信