Drug detection in oral fluid and urine after single therapeutic doses of dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate in healthy volunteers.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Arne Helland, Sébastien Muller, Olav Spigset, Hege-Merete Krabseth, Miriam Hansen, Ragnhild Bergene Skråstad
{"title":"Drug detection in oral fluid and urine after single therapeutic doses of dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate in healthy volunteers.","authors":"Arne Helland, Sébastien Muller, Olav Spigset, Hege-Merete Krabseth, Miriam Hansen, Ragnhild Bergene Skråstad","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate are central stimulant drugs widely used to treat Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but poor adherence may lead to treatment failure and the drugs are also subject to misuse and diversion. Drug analysis in oral fluid may thus be useful for monitoring adherence and misuse. We measured drug concentrations in oral fluid and urine after controlled dosing to investigate detection windows and evaluate the chosen cut-offs. Healthy volunteers ingested single oral doses of 10 mg dexamphetamine (n=11), 30 mg lisdexamphetamine (n=11), or 20 mg methylphenidate (n=10), after which they collected parallel oral fluid and urine samples every 8 hours for 4-6 days. Amphetamine (analytical cut-off, oral fluid: 1.5 ng/mL; urine: 50 ng/mL), methylphenidate (oral fluid: 0.06 ng/mL), and ritalinic acid (urine: 500 ng/mL) were analyzed using fully validated chromatographic methods. The median time from ingestion to the last detection in oral fluid was 67 ± 4.9 (lisdexamphetamine) and 69 ± 8.8 (dexamphetamine) hours for amphetamine and 36 ± 2.5 hours for methylphenidate. This was comparable to urine (77 ± 5.1 hours for lisdexamphetamine, 78 ± 4.5 hours for dexamphetamine, 41 ± 2.4 hours for ritalinic acid). The inter-individual variability in detection times was large, probably in part due to pH-dependent disposition. Using a logistic regression approach, we found similar detection rates as a function of time since intake in urine and oral fluid with the chosen cut-offs, with a high degree of probability for detection at least 24 hours after intake of a low therapeutic dose. This demonstrates the usefulness of oral fluid as a test matrix to assess adherence to ADHD medications, provided the analytical method is sensitive, requiring a cut-off as low as 0.1 ng/mL for methylphenidate. Detection windows similar to those in urine may be achieved for amphetamine and methylphenidate in oral fluid.</p>","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, and methylphenidate are central stimulant drugs widely used to treat Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but poor adherence may lead to treatment failure and the drugs are also subject to misuse and diversion. Drug analysis in oral fluid may thus be useful for monitoring adherence and misuse. We measured drug concentrations in oral fluid and urine after controlled dosing to investigate detection windows and evaluate the chosen cut-offs. Healthy volunteers ingested single oral doses of 10 mg dexamphetamine (n=11), 30 mg lisdexamphetamine (n=11), or 20 mg methylphenidate (n=10), after which they collected parallel oral fluid and urine samples every 8 hours for 4-6 days. Amphetamine (analytical cut-off, oral fluid: 1.5 ng/mL; urine: 50 ng/mL), methylphenidate (oral fluid: 0.06 ng/mL), and ritalinic acid (urine: 500 ng/mL) were analyzed using fully validated chromatographic methods. The median time from ingestion to the last detection in oral fluid was 67 ± 4.9 (lisdexamphetamine) and 69 ± 8.8 (dexamphetamine) hours for amphetamine and 36 ± 2.5 hours for methylphenidate. This was comparable to urine (77 ± 5.1 hours for lisdexamphetamine, 78 ± 4.5 hours for dexamphetamine, 41 ± 2.4 hours for ritalinic acid). The inter-individual variability in detection times was large, probably in part due to pH-dependent disposition. Using a logistic regression approach, we found similar detection rates as a function of time since intake in urine and oral fluid with the chosen cut-offs, with a high degree of probability for detection at least 24 hours after intake of a low therapeutic dose. This demonstrates the usefulness of oral fluid as a test matrix to assess adherence to ADHD medications, provided the analytical method is sensitive, requiring a cut-off as low as 0.1 ng/mL for methylphenidate. Detection windows similar to those in urine may be achieved for amphetamine and methylphenidate in oral fluid.

健康志愿者单次治疗剂量右安非他明、利德安非他明和哌甲酯后口服液和尿液中的药物检测。
右安非他明、利右安非他明和哌醋甲酯是广泛用于治疗注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的中枢兴奋剂,但依从性差可能导致治疗失败,药物也容易被滥用和转移。因此,口服液中的药物分析可能有助于监测依从性和滥用。我们在控制给药后测量了口服液和尿液中的药物浓度,以研究检测窗口并评估所选择的截止点。健康志愿者单次口服10mg右安非他明(n=11)、30mg利德安非他明(n=11)或20mg哌甲酯(n=10),之后每8小时收集一次平行的口服液和尿液样本,持续4-6天。安非他明(分析截止,口服液:1.5 ng/mL;尿液:50 ng/mL)、哌甲酯(口服液:0.06 ng/mL)和利他酸(尿液:500 ng/mL)采用完全验证的色谱方法进行分析。从摄入到最后一次在口服液中检测的中位时间为:利右安非他明67±4.9小时,安非他明69±8.8小时,哌甲酯36±2.5小时。这与尿液相当(利右安非他明77±5.1小时,右安非他明78±4.5小时,利他酸41±2.4小时)。检测时间的个体间差异很大,可能部分是由于ph依赖性的处置。使用逻辑回归方法,我们发现自尿液和口服液摄入以来的检出率与所选截止时间的函数相似,在摄入低治疗剂量后至少24小时检测到的概率很高。这证明了口服液作为评估ADHD药物依从性的测试基质的有效性,前提是分析方法是敏感的,对哌醋甲酯的截止值要求低至0.1 ng/mL。对于口服液中的安非他明和哌甲酯,可实现与尿液相似的检测窗口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信