Efficacy and safety of different progestogens in women with first threatened miscarriage: A network meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hongqiong Zhao, Wei He, Chunyu Xia, Zhu Yang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of different progestogens in women with first threatened miscarriage: A network meta-analysis.","authors":"Hongqiong Zhao, Wei He, Chunyu Xia, Zhu Yang","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.15987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Threatened miscarriage is defined as early vaginal bleeding before 12 weeks of gestational age and can occur in any pregnancy regardless of maternal age, race, comorbidities, lifestyle, or socioeconomic status, and about one-quarter of threatened miscarriages proceed to complete miscarriage. To assess the relative effectiveness and safety of different progestogens in women with first threatened miscarriage, using a network meta-analysis. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness or safety of placebo or different progestogens for the treatment of threatened miscarriage were eligible for inclusion, including dydrogesterone (oral), progesterone (oral, vaginal, rectal), and 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone (intramuscular). A Bayesian network meta-analysis with Markov chain Monte-Carlo simulation was performed in this study. A pairwise meta-analysis was carried out by synthesizing studies that compared the same interventions using a fixed-effects model. The primary outcome was the percentage of miscarriage (defined as delivery before 24 weeks of gestation) and preterm birth (defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation), and the secondary outcomes were live birth rate, congenital abnormalities, neonatal outcomes (low birth weight <2500 g), and adverse events. The risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. In total, 18 RCTs with six different interventions were included. Oral dydrogesterone can reduce the risk of miscarriage compared with both placebo (odds ratio [OR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.76) and vaginal progesterone (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.89) in women with first threatened miscarriage. In women with first threatened miscarriage, oral progesterone also reduced the risk of miscarriage compared with placebo (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.93). However, from the available evidence, there was no statistically significant difference between progestogens and placebo in preterm birth, congenital abnormality, and live birth rate. Oral dydrogesterone was safe and better at reducing miscarriage than vaginal progesterone and placebo for women with first threatened miscarriage, and better at reducing miscarriage compared with placebo for women with threatened miscarriage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15987","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Threatened miscarriage is defined as early vaginal bleeding before 12 weeks of gestational age and can occur in any pregnancy regardless of maternal age, race, comorbidities, lifestyle, or socioeconomic status, and about one-quarter of threatened miscarriages proceed to complete miscarriage. To assess the relative effectiveness and safety of different progestogens in women with first threatened miscarriage, using a network meta-analysis. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effectiveness or safety of placebo or different progestogens for the treatment of threatened miscarriage were eligible for inclusion, including dydrogesterone (oral), progesterone (oral, vaginal, rectal), and 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone (intramuscular). A Bayesian network meta-analysis with Markov chain Monte-Carlo simulation was performed in this study. A pairwise meta-analysis was carried out by synthesizing studies that compared the same interventions using a fixed-effects model. The primary outcome was the percentage of miscarriage (defined as delivery before 24 weeks of gestation) and preterm birth (defined as birth before 37 weeks of gestation), and the secondary outcomes were live birth rate, congenital abnormalities, neonatal outcomes (low birth weight <2500 g), and adverse events. The risk of bias was assessed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. In total, 18 RCTs with six different interventions were included. Oral dydrogesterone can reduce the risk of miscarriage compared with both placebo (odds ratio [OR] 0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.76) and vaginal progesterone (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.89) in women with first threatened miscarriage. In women with first threatened miscarriage, oral progesterone also reduced the risk of miscarriage compared with placebo (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.93). However, from the available evidence, there was no statistically significant difference between progestogens and placebo in preterm birth, congenital abnormality, and live birth rate. Oral dydrogesterone was safe and better at reducing miscarriage than vaginal progesterone and placebo for women with first threatened miscarriage, and better at reducing miscarriage compared with placebo for women with threatened miscarriage.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信