Access to health insurance amongst people with disabilities and its association with healthcare use, health status and financial protection in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.
IF 4.5 2区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Luthfi Azizatunnisa', Hannah Kuper, Lena Morgon Banks
{"title":"Access to health insurance amongst people with disabilities and its association with healthcare use, health status and financial protection in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.","authors":"Luthfi Azizatunnisa', Hannah Kuper, Lena Morgon Banks","doi":"10.1186/s12939-024-02339-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with disabilities often incur higher costs for healthcare, due to higher needs, greater indirect costs, and the need for services not offered by the public system. Yet, people with disabilities are more likely to experience poverty and so have reduced capacity to pay. Health insurance is an important social protection strategy to meet healthcare needs and avoid catastrophic expenditures for this group. This systematic review synthesized evidence on health insurance coverage and potential effects among people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review followed PRISMA Guidelines. We searched English peer-reviewed articles from nine databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PsyInfo, Global Health, and Econlit) from January 2000 to 24 January 2023. Two independent reviewers conducted the article selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using NIH Guidelines. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they quantitatively assessed at least one of four key outcomes amongst people with disabilities: health insurance coverage/access, the association between health insurance and health care utilization, financial protection, or health status/outcome. Narrative synthesis was deployed due to high variety of outcome measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 8,545 records retrieved and three from hand search, 38 studies covering data from 51 countries met the eligibility criteria. Over two-thirds (68.4%) focused on access/coverage, which was generally limited amongst people with disabilities. Seventeen studies (44.7%) examined healthcare utilization, with a positive association (9/12) found between health insurance and the use of disability-related services. However, its association with general healthcare utilization (5 studies) remained inconclusive. Financial protection, explored by six studies (15.8%), similarly yielded inconclusive results. Only four studies (10.5%) reported on health status, and the findings suggest a favourable association of health insurance with self-reported health among people with disabilities (2/4), despite the limited number of high-quality studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is considerable variability and limited evidence regarding health insurance coverage and its potential impact among individuals with disabilities in LMICs. This gap highlights the pressing need for further evaluations of health insurance, with a specific focus on people with disabilities, aligning with the broader goal of achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC).</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023389533.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"264"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-024-02339-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: People with disabilities often incur higher costs for healthcare, due to higher needs, greater indirect costs, and the need for services not offered by the public system. Yet, people with disabilities are more likely to experience poverty and so have reduced capacity to pay. Health insurance is an important social protection strategy to meet healthcare needs and avoid catastrophic expenditures for this group. This systematic review synthesized evidence on health insurance coverage and potential effects among people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA Guidelines. We searched English peer-reviewed articles from nine databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PsyInfo, Global Health, and Econlit) from January 2000 to 24 January 2023. Two independent reviewers conducted the article selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using NIH Guidelines. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they quantitatively assessed at least one of four key outcomes amongst people with disabilities: health insurance coverage/access, the association between health insurance and health care utilization, financial protection, or health status/outcome. Narrative synthesis was deployed due to high variety of outcome measurements.
Results: Out of 8,545 records retrieved and three from hand search, 38 studies covering data from 51 countries met the eligibility criteria. Over two-thirds (68.4%) focused on access/coverage, which was generally limited amongst people with disabilities. Seventeen studies (44.7%) examined healthcare utilization, with a positive association (9/12) found between health insurance and the use of disability-related services. However, its association with general healthcare utilization (5 studies) remained inconclusive. Financial protection, explored by six studies (15.8%), similarly yielded inconclusive results. Only four studies (10.5%) reported on health status, and the findings suggest a favourable association of health insurance with self-reported health among people with disabilities (2/4), despite the limited number of high-quality studies.
Conclusions: There is considerable variability and limited evidence regarding health insurance coverage and its potential impact among individuals with disabilities in LMICs. This gap highlights the pressing need for further evaluations of health insurance, with a specific focus on people with disabilities, aligning with the broader goal of achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC).
背景:由于更高的需求、更高的间接成本以及对公共系统无法提供的服务的需求,残疾人往往需要更高的医疗保健费用。然而,残疾人更有可能经历贫困,因此支付能力下降。健康保险是一项重要的社会保护战略,旨在满足这一群体的医疗保健需求,避免灾难性支出。本系统综述综合了低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)残疾人健康保险覆盖面及其潜在影响的证据。方法:本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南。我们检索了2000年1月至2023年1月24日9个数据库(Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, PsyInfo, Global Health和Econlit)的英文同行评议文章。两位独立审稿人根据NIH指南进行了文章选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估。如果研究定量评估了残疾人的四项关键结果中的至少一项,即健康保险覆盖/获取、健康保险与医疗保健利用之间的关联、财务保护或健康状况/结果,则有资格纳入研究。由于结果测量的多样性高,采用了叙事综合。结果:在8545条检索记录和3条手工检索记录中,来自51个国家的38项研究符合资格标准。超过三分之二(68.4%)侧重于获取/覆盖,这在残疾人中普遍有限。17项研究(44.7%)调查了医疗保健的利用情况,发现医疗保险与使用与残疾有关的服务之间存在正相关关系(9/12)。然而,其与一般医疗保健利用的关系(5项研究)仍不确定。六项研究(15.8%)对金融保护进行了探讨,同样得出了不确定的结果。只有四项研究(10.5%)报告了健康状况,研究结果表明,尽管高质量的研究数量有限,但健康保险与残疾人自我报告的健康状况之间存在良好的联系(2/4)。结论:低收入中低收入国家残疾人的医疗保险覆盖率及其潜在影响存在相当大的可变性和有限的证据。这一差距突出表明,迫切需要进一步评估医疗保险,特别关注残疾人,与实现全民健康覆盖的更广泛目标保持一致。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42023389533。
期刊介绍:
International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.