Jordan Beveridge, Poorva Sheth, Shaan Thakkar, Bret Silverglate, George Grossberg
{"title":"The impact of cognitive reserve relative to risk of Alzheimer's disease and rate of progression: an up-to-date review of the literature.","authors":"Jordan Beveridge, Poorva Sheth, Shaan Thakkar, Bret Silverglate, George Grossberg","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2024.2445015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive reserve (CR) is a crucial factor in explaining individual differences in the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cognitive decline. CR refers to the brain's ability to cope with pathology through compensatory mechanisms. This review examines the various methods used to measure, predict, and influence CR.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Based on a search of PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library (up to 1 June 2024), this review addresses key CR proxies, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The review also explores established and emerging interventions. We critically evaluate the statistical methods used to measure CR and assess its practical application.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>CR plays a crucial role in delaying the onset and progression of AD. Lifestyle choices and experiences build CR and impact cognitive aging. However, practical challenges remain in applying CR in clinical settings, particularly in individuals with advanced cognitive decline. Education, while commonly used as a proxy for CR, may not fully capture its complexity. Alternatives like occupational complexity could offer more practical measures, but their application is still evolving. Addressing these limitations is key to advancing dementia prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2024.2445015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Cognitive reserve (CR) is a crucial factor in explaining individual differences in the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cognitive decline. CR refers to the brain's ability to cope with pathology through compensatory mechanisms. This review examines the various methods used to measure, predict, and influence CR.
Areas covered: Based on a search of PubMed, PubMed Central, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library (up to 1 June 2024), this review addresses key CR proxies, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The review also explores established and emerging interventions. We critically evaluate the statistical methods used to measure CR and assess its practical application.
Expert opinion: CR plays a crucial role in delaying the onset and progression of AD. Lifestyle choices and experiences build CR and impact cognitive aging. However, practical challenges remain in applying CR in clinical settings, particularly in individuals with advanced cognitive decline. Education, while commonly used as a proxy for CR, may not fully capture its complexity. Alternatives like occupational complexity could offer more practical measures, but their application is still evolving. Addressing these limitations is key to advancing dementia prevention strategies.
期刊介绍：
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
