Lung ultrasound on first postoperative day predicts out-of-hospital pulmonary complications following video-assisted thoracic surgery: A prospective cohort study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
ZiYun Lu, Hang Sun, Shujie Niu, Min Wang, Yiwei Zhong, Bingbing Li
{"title":"Lung ultrasound on first postoperative day predicts out-of-hospital pulmonary complications following video-assisted thoracic surgery: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"ZiYun Lu, Hang Sun, Shujie Niu, Min Wang, Yiwei Zhong, Bingbing Li","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The integration of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols into the peri-operative management of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has facilitated rapid patient recovery, enabling discharge within 48 h. However, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) postdischarge pose significant concerns for patient welfare. Despite the established utility of lung ultrasound (LUS) in diagnosing the causes of dyspnoea, the effectiveness of quantitative LUS in predicting PPCs after VATS remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether quantitative LUS performed 24 h after surgery can identify patients with a higher risk of developing PPCs within 30 days after discharge from hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-centre prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic tertiary care medical centre.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults scheduled for elective VATS under general anaesthesia from November 2022 to January 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>This primary aim was to verify the association between lung ultrasound score (LUSS) on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and PPCs. The secondary aim was to identify other relevant peri-operative factors closely related to PPCs and establish a model capable of predicting the risk of PPCs in patients undergoing fast-track VATS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 200 recruited patients, 182 completed the LUS examination and 30-day follow-up. Of these, 66 (36.2%) developed various types of PPCs. These patients had a higher LUSS on POD 1 (P < 0.001), and more subpleural consolidation areas compared to those without PPCs (P < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis identified the optimal LUSS cut-off value at 6 points for predicting the occurrence of PPCs, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.838 (95% CI, 0.768 to 0.909). Patients with PPCs had higher rates of immune system diseases and ARISCAT score, longer hospital stay and procalcitonin levels, increased frequency of lobar resection, longer durations of surgical and mechanical ventilation, and greater incidence of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days postdischarge, compared with those without PPCs (all P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that the comorbidity of immune system disease, along with postoperative 24 h LUSS, were independent risk factor for PPCs within 30 days after VATS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LUSS on POD 1 emerged as an independent risk factor for PPCs in fast-track VATS patients and reliably predicted the occurrence of PPCs within 30 days of hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials. gov No. ChiCTR2200065865.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The integration of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols into the peri-operative management of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has facilitated rapid patient recovery, enabling discharge within 48 h. However, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) postdischarge pose significant concerns for patient welfare. Despite the established utility of lung ultrasound (LUS) in diagnosing the causes of dyspnoea, the effectiveness of quantitative LUS in predicting PPCs after VATS remains uncertain.

Objectives: To determine whether quantitative LUS performed 24 h after surgery can identify patients with a higher risk of developing PPCs within 30 days after discharge from hospital.

Design: Single-centre prospective cohort study.

Setting: Academic tertiary care medical centre.

Patients: Adults scheduled for elective VATS under general anaesthesia from November 2022 to January 2023.

Main outcome measures: This primary aim was to verify the association between lung ultrasound score (LUSS) on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and PPCs. The secondary aim was to identify other relevant peri-operative factors closely related to PPCs and establish a model capable of predicting the risk of PPCs in patients undergoing fast-track VATS.

Results: Of the 200 recruited patients, 182 completed the LUS examination and 30-day follow-up. Of these, 66 (36.2%) developed various types of PPCs. These patients had a higher LUSS on POD 1 (P < 0.001), and more subpleural consolidation areas compared to those without PPCs (P < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) analysis identified the optimal LUSS cut-off value at 6 points for predicting the occurrence of PPCs, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.838 (95% CI, 0.768 to 0.909). Patients with PPCs had higher rates of immune system diseases and ARISCAT score, longer hospital stay and procalcitonin levels, increased frequency of lobar resection, longer durations of surgical and mechanical ventilation, and greater incidence of unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days postdischarge, compared with those without PPCs (all P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that the comorbidity of immune system disease, along with postoperative 24 h LUSS, were independent risk factor for PPCs within 30 days after VATS.

Conclusion: LUSS on POD 1 emerged as an independent risk factor for PPCs in fast-track VATS patients and reliably predicted the occurrence of PPCs within 30 days of hospital discharge.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials. gov No. ChiCTR2200065865.

术后第一天的肺部超声预测视频辅助胸外科术后院外肺部并发症:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:将术后增强恢复(ERAS)协议整合到视频辅助胸外科手术(VATS)的围手术期管理中,促进了患者的快速恢复,使患者能够在48小时内出院。然而,术后肺部并发症(PPCs)出院后对患者的福利提出了重大关切。尽管肺超声(LUS)在诊断呼吸困难原因方面的应用已经确立,但定量LUS在预测VATS后PPCs方面的有效性仍不确定。目的:确定术后24小时进行定量LUS是否可以识别出出院后30天内发生PPCs的高危患者。设计:单中心前瞻性队列研究。环境:学术三级医疗中心。患者:计划于2022年11月至2023年1月在全身麻醉下进行选择性VATS的成年人。主要结局指标:主要目的是验证术后第1天(POD1)肺超声评分(LUSS)与PPCs之间的关系。次要目的是确定其他与PPCs密切相关的围手术期因素,并建立一个能够预测快速通道VATS患者PPCs风险的模型。结果:入选的200例患者中,182例完成了LUS检查和30天的随访。其中,66例(36.2%)发生了各种类型的PPCs。结论:POD 1 LUSS是快速通道VATS患者发生PPCs的独立危险因素,可可靠预测出院后30天内PPCs的发生。试验注册:临床试验。政府没有。ChiCTR2200065865。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信