A randomized phase 2 study of efmarodocokin alfa, an IL-22 agonist, versus vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis.

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Silvio Danese, Michael E Rothenberg, Jeremy J Lim, Han Ting Ding, Jacqueline M McBride, Yiling Chen, Ajit Dash, Jordan S Mar, Mary Keir, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Julian Panes, Jean-Frederic Colombel, Brian Feagan, John F Valentine, Stefan Schreiber
{"title":"A randomized phase 2 study of efmarodocokin alfa, an IL-22 agonist, versus vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis.","authors":"Silvio Danese, Michael E Rothenberg, Jeremy J Lim, Han Ting Ding, Jacqueline M McBride, Yiling Chen, Ajit Dash, Jordan S Mar, Mary Keir, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Julian Panes, Jean-Frederic Colombel, Brian Feagan, John F Valentine, Stefan Schreiber","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.11.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Efmarodocokin alfa is an interleukin (IL)-22 agonist, with favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and an acceptable safety profile. This study further explored the therapeutic potential of efmarodocokin alfa compared to vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, PK, and pharmacodynamics of 3 doses of efmarodocokin alfa administered intravenously every 4 weeks (30 μg/kg [n=43], 60 μg/kg [n=44], and 90 μg/kg [n=43]) compared with placebo (n=22) and with vedolizumab (n=43) in the treatment of moderate to severe UC. Key clinical outcomes were assessed through the modified Mayo Clinic Score, and endoscopic evaluations by a central reader.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Efmarodocokin alfa was adequately tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. Although efmarodocokin alfa did not show statistically significant improvement in clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic healing, or endoscopic remission at week 8 compared to placebo, vedolizumab demonstrated some efficacy. Clinical remission was achieved by 12%, 9%, and 12% of patients in the 30, 60, and 90 μg/kg dose arms, respectively, compared with 9% and 26% of patients in the placebo and vedolizumab arms at week 8. Similarly, endoscopic healing at week 8 was achieved by 14%, 14%, and 12% of patients in the 30, 60, and 90 μg/kg dose arms, respectively, compared with 14% and 33% of patients in the placebo and vedolizumab arms. A dose-dependent increase in pharmacodynamic biomarkers was observed (REG3A and CRP levels).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efmarodocokin alfa did not demonstrate efficacy compared to placebo and this phase 2 study was ended early for futility; however, there was evidence of target engagement (skin AEs, REG3A levels); NCT03558152.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.11.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Efmarodocokin alfa is an interleukin (IL)-22 agonist, with favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and an acceptable safety profile. This study further explored the therapeutic potential of efmarodocokin alfa compared to vedolizumab in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

Methods: This randomized phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, PK, and pharmacodynamics of 3 doses of efmarodocokin alfa administered intravenously every 4 weeks (30 μg/kg [n=43], 60 μg/kg [n=44], and 90 μg/kg [n=43]) compared with placebo (n=22) and with vedolizumab (n=43) in the treatment of moderate to severe UC. Key clinical outcomes were assessed through the modified Mayo Clinic Score, and endoscopic evaluations by a central reader.

Results: Efmarodocokin alfa was adequately tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. Although efmarodocokin alfa did not show statistically significant improvement in clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic healing, or endoscopic remission at week 8 compared to placebo, vedolizumab demonstrated some efficacy. Clinical remission was achieved by 12%, 9%, and 12% of patients in the 30, 60, and 90 μg/kg dose arms, respectively, compared with 9% and 26% of patients in the placebo and vedolizumab arms at week 8. Similarly, endoscopic healing at week 8 was achieved by 14%, 14%, and 12% of patients in the 30, 60, and 90 μg/kg dose arms, respectively, compared with 14% and 33% of patients in the placebo and vedolizumab arms. A dose-dependent increase in pharmacodynamic biomarkers was observed (REG3A and CRP levels).

Conclusion: Efmarodocokin alfa did not demonstrate efficacy compared to placebo and this phase 2 study was ended early for futility; however, there was evidence of target engagement (skin AEs, REG3A levels); NCT03558152.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信