Clinical outcome after bleeding events following coronary stenting in patients with and without comorbid peripheral arterial disease.

IF 3.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tineke H Pinxterhuis, Eline H Ploumen, Marlies M Kok, Carl E Schotborgh, Rutger L Anthonio, Ariel Roguin, Peter W Danse, Edouard Benit, Adel Aminian, Marc Hartmann, Gerard C M Linssen, Robert H Geelkerken, Carine J M Doggen, Clemens von Birgelen
{"title":"Clinical outcome after bleeding events following coronary stenting in patients with and without comorbid peripheral arterial disease.","authors":"Tineke H Pinxterhuis, Eline H Ploumen, Marlies M Kok, Carl E Schotborgh, Rutger L Anthonio, Ariel Roguin, Peter W Danse, Edouard Benit, Adel Aminian, Marc Hartmann, Gerard C M Linssen, Robert H Geelkerken, Carine J M Doggen, Clemens von Birgelen","doi":"10.1007/s12928-024-01073-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may experience bleeding events. Bleeding risk is increased in patients with comorbid peripheral arterial disease (PADs). To evaluate whether PCI patients with PADs have worse outcome after bleeding, we assessed pooled patient-level data of 5,989 randomized all-comer trial participants and identified those who had a bleeding (BIO-RESORT:NCT01674803, BIONYX:NCT02508714). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality were assessed from bleeding until 3 years after PCI. Of all 313 PCI patients with bleeding events, patients with PADs (n = 34, 10.9%) were older and had more complex lesions than those without PADs (n = 279, 89.1%). In patients with PADs, bleeding occurred more often during the first year after PCI (79.4% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.013). The proportion of major bleeding, and the severity and location of bleeding were similar between both groups. Multivariate analysis found no statistically significant between-group difference in MACE (43.1% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.53; adj.HR:0.86, 95%CI 0.45-1.63, p = 0.64) and mortality (33.5% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.12; adj.HR:1.45, 95%CI 0.73-2.91, p = 0.29). Bleeding occurred significantly more often during the first year after PCI in all-comer patients with concomitant PADs than in those without PADs, while we observed no significant between-group difference in bleeding severity and location, and the risk of adverse events after bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-024-01073-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may experience bleeding events. Bleeding risk is increased in patients with comorbid peripheral arterial disease (PADs). To evaluate whether PCI patients with PADs have worse outcome after bleeding, we assessed pooled patient-level data of 5,989 randomized all-comer trial participants and identified those who had a bleeding (BIO-RESORT:NCT01674803, BIONYX:NCT02508714). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality were assessed from bleeding until 3 years after PCI. Of all 313 PCI patients with bleeding events, patients with PADs (n = 34, 10.9%) were older and had more complex lesions than those without PADs (n = 279, 89.1%). In patients with PADs, bleeding occurred more often during the first year after PCI (79.4% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.013). The proportion of major bleeding, and the severity and location of bleeding were similar between both groups. Multivariate analysis found no statistically significant between-group difference in MACE (43.1% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.53; adj.HR:0.86, 95%CI 0.45-1.63, p = 0.64) and mortality (33.5% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.12; adj.HR:1.45, 95%CI 0.73-2.91, p = 0.29). Bleeding occurred significantly more often during the first year after PCI in all-comer patients with concomitant PADs than in those without PADs, while we observed no significant between-group difference in bleeding severity and location, and the risk of adverse events after bleeding.

伴有或不伴有外周动脉疾病患者冠状动脉支架植入术后出血事件的临床结果
接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者可能会出现出血事件。合并外周动脉疾病(pad)的患者出血风险增加。为了评估PCI合并pad患者出血后的预后是否更差,我们评估了5,989名随机试验参与者的患者水平数据,并确定了出血患者(BIO-RESORT:NCT01674803, BIONYX:NCT02508714)。主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和死亡率从出血到PCI术后3年进行评估。在所有313例发生出血事件的PCI患者中,有pad的患者(n = 34, 10.9%)比没有pad的患者(n = 279, 89.1%)年龄更大,病变更复杂。在pad患者中,PCI术后第一年出血发生率更高(79.4% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.013)。两组患者大出血比例、严重程度及出血部位相似。多因素分析发现,组间MACE差异无统计学意义(43.1%比34.7%,p = 0.53;adj.HR: 0.86, 95% ci 0.45 - -1.63, p = 0.64)和死亡率(33.5%比22.3%,p = 0.12;[j] hr:1.45, 95%CI 0.73 ~ 2.91, p = 0.29)。合并pad的所有患者在PCI术后第一年出血的发生率明显高于未合并pad的患者,但我们观察到出血严重程度和部位以及出血后不良事件的风险在组间无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信