Therapeutic drug monitoring, population pharmacokinetics models and external validation of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1159/000543181
Natalia Maximova, Pasquale Fabio Calabrò, Alice Cangialosi, Antonello Di Paolo
{"title":"Therapeutic drug monitoring, population pharmacokinetics models and external validation of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.","authors":"Natalia Maximova, Pasquale Fabio Calabrò, Alice Cangialosi, Antonello Di Paolo","doi":"10.1159/000543181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High-dose MTX is used to treat pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The drug has a low therapeutic index and a highly interindividual variability in systemic exposure. These characteristics necessitate dose adjustments and therapeutic drug monitoring protocols, while population pharmacokinetic (POP/PK) models may enable more precise drug dosing. Therefore, we assessed the performance of external POP/PK models in ALL children receiving high-dose MTX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively harvested clinical and laboratory data from ALL children during their first two cycles of chemotherapy. A POP/PK model was elaborated using the Monolix suite 2024.R1. External models were selected from PUBMED based on strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, and their fit to the actual data was assessed by calculating bias (PE%) and precision (RMSE%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven ALL children participated in the study (18 males, median age 5.1 years, range 1.7-15.2 years), and six external POP/PK models were chosen. Except for one model (median PE% value, -97.45%), all models exhibited acceptable bias (median PE% values, -4.17% to 2.67%), despite none of them demonstrating good precision (median RMSE% values, 89.19% to 120.40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>External models should be accurately evaluated before they are implemented in clinical practice, even when patients share very similar characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10047,"journal":{"name":"Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: High-dose MTX is used to treat pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The drug has a low therapeutic index and a highly interindividual variability in systemic exposure. These characteristics necessitate dose adjustments and therapeutic drug monitoring protocols, while population pharmacokinetic (POP/PK) models may enable more precise drug dosing. Therefore, we assessed the performance of external POP/PK models in ALL children receiving high-dose MTX.

Methods: We retrospectively harvested clinical and laboratory data from ALL children during their first two cycles of chemotherapy. A POP/PK model was elaborated using the Monolix suite 2024.R1. External models were selected from PUBMED based on strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, and their fit to the actual data was assessed by calculating bias (PE%) and precision (RMSE%).

Results: Thirty-seven ALL children participated in the study (18 males, median age 5.1 years, range 1.7-15.2 years), and six external POP/PK models were chosen. Except for one model (median PE% value, -97.45%), all models exhibited acceptable bias (median PE% values, -4.17% to 2.67%), despite none of them demonstrating good precision (median RMSE% values, 89.19% to 120.40%).

Conclusion: External models should be accurately evaluated before they are implemented in clinical practice, even when patients share very similar characteristics.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original research articles and state-of-the-art reviews on all aspects of antimicrobial and antitumor chemotherapy. The results of experimental and clinical investigations into the microbiological and pharmacologic properties of antibacterial, antiviral and antitumor compounds are major topics of publication. Papers selected for the journal offer data concerning the efficacy, toxicology, and interactions of new drugs in single or combined applications. Studies designed to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of similar preparations and comparing their efficacy are also included. Special emphasis is given to the development of drug-resistance, an increasing problem worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信