Therapeutic drug monitoring, population pharmacokinetics models and external validation of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Natalia Maximova, Pasquale Fabio Calabrò, Alice Cangialosi, Antonello Di Paolo
{"title":"Therapeutic drug monitoring, population pharmacokinetics models and external validation of high-dose methotrexate in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.","authors":"Natalia Maximova, Pasquale Fabio Calabrò, Alice Cangialosi, Antonello Di Paolo","doi":"10.1159/000543181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>High-dose MTX is used to treat pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The drug has a low therapeutic index and a highly interindividual variability in systemic exposure. These characteristics necessitate dose adjustments and therapeutic drug monitoring protocols, while population pharmacokinetic (POP/PK) models may enable more precise drug dosing. Therefore, we assessed the performance of external POP/PK models in ALL children receiving high-dose MTX.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively harvested clinical and laboratory data from ALL children during their first two cycles of chemotherapy. A POP/PK model was elaborated using the Monolix suite 2024.R1. External models were selected from PUBMED based on strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, and their fit to the actual data was assessed by calculating bias (PE%) and precision (RMSE%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven ALL children participated in the study (18 males, median age 5.1 years, range 1.7-15.2 years), and six external POP/PK models were chosen. Except for one model (median PE% value, -97.45%), all models exhibited acceptable bias (median PE% values, -4.17% to 2.67%), despite none of them demonstrating good precision (median RMSE% values, 89.19% to 120.40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>External models should be accurately evaluated before they are implemented in clinical practice, even when patients share very similar characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":10047,"journal":{"name":"Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: High-dose MTX is used to treat pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The drug has a low therapeutic index and a highly interindividual variability in systemic exposure. These characteristics necessitate dose adjustments and therapeutic drug monitoring protocols, while population pharmacokinetic (POP/PK) models may enable more precise drug dosing. Therefore, we assessed the performance of external POP/PK models in ALL children receiving high-dose MTX.
Methods: We retrospectively harvested clinical and laboratory data from ALL children during their first two cycles of chemotherapy. A POP/PK model was elaborated using the Monolix suite 2024.R1. External models were selected from PUBMED based on strict inclusion/exclusion criteria, and their fit to the actual data was assessed by calculating bias (PE%) and precision (RMSE%).
Results: Thirty-seven ALL children participated in the study (18 males, median age 5.1 years, range 1.7-15.2 years), and six external POP/PK models were chosen. Except for one model (median PE% value, -97.45%), all models exhibited acceptable bias (median PE% values, -4.17% to 2.67%), despite none of them demonstrating good precision (median RMSE% values, 89.19% to 120.40%).
Conclusion: External models should be accurately evaluated before they are implemented in clinical practice, even when patients share very similar characteristics.
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes original research articles and state-of-the-art reviews on all aspects of antimicrobial and antitumor chemotherapy. The results of experimental and clinical investigations into the microbiological and pharmacologic properties of antibacterial, antiviral and antitumor compounds are major topics of publication. Papers selected for the journal offer data concerning the efficacy, toxicology, and interactions of new drugs in single or combined applications. Studies designed to determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of similar preparations and comparing their efficacy are also included. Special emphasis is given to the development of drug-resistance, an increasing problem worldwide.