Frontalis sling surgery - pediatric versus adult population: characteristics and outcomes.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Roee Arnon, Mordechai Rosner, Ayelet Priel, Oded Sagiv, Daphna Landau-Prat, Oded Rock, Sharon Armanik, Yonatan Shalamaev, Mattan Arazi, Ofira Zloto
{"title":"Frontalis sling surgery - pediatric versus adult population: characteristics and outcomes.","authors":"Roee Arnon, Mordechai Rosner, Ayelet Priel, Oded Sagiv, Daphna Landau-Prat, Oded Rock, Sharon Armanik, Yonatan Shalamaev, Mattan Arazi, Ofira Zloto","doi":"10.1186/s12886-024-03809-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Frontalis sling surgery is a common method for ptosis correction for both pediatric and adult populations. This study aims to compare the characteristics and outcomes of this surgery in these two populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent frontalis sling surgery between the years 2009 and 2024, with complete medical chart data, and had at least a one-month follow-up period were included. Age, gender, ptosis type, type of sling, complications, and re-surgery were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62 patients were included, with 41 patients in the pediatric group and 21 patients in the adult group. The mean age was 4.7 ± 5.0 and 46.04 ± 18.33 years old in the pediatric and adult groups, respectively. The most common etiology of ptosis in the pediatric group was simple congenital (70%), while the most common etiology in the adult group was myogenic ptosis due to a systemic condition (47%) (p < 0.001). Baseline pre-operative MRD1 (marginal reflex distance 1) was lower in the adult group compared to the pediatric ( -0.37 ± 1.21 mm vs. 0.36 ± 0.65 mm respectively (t-test, p = 0.04)). However, the mean change in MRD1 (pre-operative to postoperative) was not significantly different for both groups (t-test, p = 0.5). A higher rate of sling extrusion was observed among the adult group (0% of pediatrics vs. 14% of adults, chi-square, p = 0.013). A higher number of previous sling surgeries were found to be positively correlated (r = 0.672) with overall postoperative complications (Pearson correlation. p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frontalis sling surgery varies between adult and pediatric patients regarding etiology, preoperative findings, surgical approach, and complications. Adults experienced higher rates of complications such as sling extrusion and dry eye. Moreover, an increased number of previous sling surgeries was associated with a rise in postoperative complications such as suture dehiscence, extrusion, and granuloma formation. Consequently, frontalis sling procedures should be regarded as a last resort for ptosis correction in adults due to the elevated risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"24 1","pages":"534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03809-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Frontalis sling surgery is a common method for ptosis correction for both pediatric and adult populations. This study aims to compare the characteristics and outcomes of this surgery in these two populations.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent frontalis sling surgery between the years 2009 and 2024, with complete medical chart data, and had at least a one-month follow-up period were included. Age, gender, ptosis type, type of sling, complications, and re-surgery were analyzed.

Results: A total of 62 patients were included, with 41 patients in the pediatric group and 21 patients in the adult group. The mean age was 4.7 ± 5.0 and 46.04 ± 18.33 years old in the pediatric and adult groups, respectively. The most common etiology of ptosis in the pediatric group was simple congenital (70%), while the most common etiology in the adult group was myogenic ptosis due to a systemic condition (47%) (p < 0.001). Baseline pre-operative MRD1 (marginal reflex distance 1) was lower in the adult group compared to the pediatric ( -0.37 ± 1.21 mm vs. 0.36 ± 0.65 mm respectively (t-test, p = 0.04)). However, the mean change in MRD1 (pre-operative to postoperative) was not significantly different for both groups (t-test, p = 0.5). A higher rate of sling extrusion was observed among the adult group (0% of pediatrics vs. 14% of adults, chi-square, p = 0.013). A higher number of previous sling surgeries were found to be positively correlated (r = 0.672) with overall postoperative complications (Pearson correlation. p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Frontalis sling surgery varies between adult and pediatric patients regarding etiology, preoperative findings, surgical approach, and complications. Adults experienced higher rates of complications such as sling extrusion and dry eye. Moreover, an increased number of previous sling surgeries was associated with a rise in postoperative complications such as suture dehiscence, extrusion, and granuloma formation. Consequently, frontalis sling procedures should be regarded as a last resort for ptosis correction in adults due to the elevated risk of complications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信