Use of metered dose inhalers for bronchodilator responsiveness testing: laboratory practices in Australia and opportunities for carbon footprint reduction.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Michael J Loftus, Jayne Roberts, Nicholas Romeo, Pam Matsas, Karin Leder, Brigitte Borg, Belinda R Miller
{"title":"Use of metered dose inhalers for bronchodilator responsiveness testing: laboratory practices in Australia and opportunities for carbon footprint reduction.","authors":"Michael J Loftus, Jayne Roberts, Nicholas Romeo, Pam Matsas, Karin Leder, Brigitte Borg, Belinda R Miller","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are important devices for delivering inhaled medications; however, they have an outsized carbon footprint due to their propellant gas. Many short-acting beta-agonist inhalers contain HFA-134a which has a global warming potential >1000 fold higher than carbon dioxide. We aimed to determine the practices around MDI use and disposal within Australia's major lung function testing laboratories and identify the actions that most influence the carbon footprint of bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Australia's 45 accredited lung function laboratories were invited to participate in an online survey asking about their volume of BDR testing, as well as practices around MDI use such as the number of actuations per BDR test, reuse of MDIs between patients and disposal method. We calculated MDI-associated carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions by combining previously published estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>39 laboratories completed the survey. Most laboratories used 4 actuations of salbutamol per BDR test for both adults (27/34, 79.4%) and children (17/20, 85%), but this ranged from 2 to 12. Only three (7.7%) laboratories did not routinely reuse MDIs between patients; however, they all sent their used MDIs for high-temperature incineration. Based on different combinations of observed MDI practices in Australia, we identified a potential sixfold difference in CO2e per 100 BDR tests, from as low as 23.3 kg CO2e up to 166 kg CO2e.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified three key practices to reduce the carbon footprint of BDR testing: disposing of MDIs via high-temperature incineration, reducing the number of actuations per BDR test and reusing MDIs between patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are important devices for delivering inhaled medications; however, they have an outsized carbon footprint due to their propellant gas. Many short-acting beta-agonist inhalers contain HFA-134a which has a global warming potential >1000 fold higher than carbon dioxide. We aimed to determine the practices around MDI use and disposal within Australia's major lung function testing laboratories and identify the actions that most influence the carbon footprint of bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) testing.

Methods: Australia's 45 accredited lung function laboratories were invited to participate in an online survey asking about their volume of BDR testing, as well as practices around MDI use such as the number of actuations per BDR test, reuse of MDIs between patients and disposal method. We calculated MDI-associated carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions by combining previously published estimates.

Results: 39 laboratories completed the survey. Most laboratories used 4 actuations of salbutamol per BDR test for both adults (27/34, 79.4%) and children (17/20, 85%), but this ranged from 2 to 12. Only three (7.7%) laboratories did not routinely reuse MDIs between patients; however, they all sent their used MDIs for high-temperature incineration. Based on different combinations of observed MDI practices in Australia, we identified a potential sixfold difference in CO2e per 100 BDR tests, from as low as 23.3 kg CO2e up to 166 kg CO2e.

Conclusions: We identified three key practices to reduce the carbon footprint of BDR testing: disposing of MDIs via high-temperature incineration, reducing the number of actuations per BDR test and reusing MDIs between patients.

使用计量吸入器进行支气管扩张剂反应性测试:澳大利亚的实验室做法和减少碳足迹的机会。
背景:计量吸入器(MDIs)是输送吸入性药物的重要装置;然而,由于推进剂气体,它们的碳足迹过大。许多短效β激动剂吸入器含有HFA-134a,其全球变暖潜能值比二氧化碳高1000倍。我们旨在确定澳大利亚主要肺功能检测实验室中MDI使用和处置的做法,并确定最影响支气管扩张剂反应性(BDR)测试碳足迹的行为。方法:邀请澳大利亚45家经认证的肺功能实验室参与一项在线调查,询问他们的BDR测试量,以及MDI使用的实践,如每次BDR测试的驱动次数,患者之间MDI的重复使用和处理方法。我们通过结合先前公布的估算,计算了与mdi相关的二氧化碳当量(CO2e)排放量。结果:39个实验室完成调查。大多数实验室对成人(27/34,79.4%)和儿童(17/20,85%)的每次BDR试验使用4次沙丁胺醇,但这一数值从2到12不等。只有3家(7.7%)实验室没有常规地在患者之间重复使用MDIs;然而,他们都把用过的吸入器送去高温焚烧。根据在澳大利亚观察到的MDI做法的不同组合,我们确定了每100次BDR测试的二氧化碳当量可能相差六倍,从低至23.3公斤二氧化碳当量到166公斤二氧化碳当量。结论:我们确定了减少BDR测试碳足迹的三个关键做法:通过高温焚烧处理吸入器,减少每次BDR测试的驱动次数,以及在患者之间重复使用吸入器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信