Predicting maternal risk level using machine learning models.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sulaiman Salim Al Mashrafi, Laleh Tafakori, Mali Abdollahian
{"title":"Predicting maternal risk level using machine learning models.","authors":"Sulaiman Salim Al Mashrafi, Laleh Tafakori, Mali Abdollahian","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-07030-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal morbidity and mortality remain critical health concerns globally. As a result, reducing the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is part of goal 3 in the global sustainable development goals (SDGs), and previously, it was an important indicator in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Therefore, identifying high-risk groups during pregnancy is crucial for decision-makers and medical practitioners to mitigate mortality and morbidity. However, the availability of accurate predictive models for maternal mortality and maternal health risks is challenging. Compared with traditional predictive models, machine learning algorithms have emerged as promising predictive modelling methods providing accurate predictive models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work aims to explore the potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms in maternal risk level prediction using a nationwide maternal mortality dataset from Oman for the first time. A total of 402 maternal deaths from 1991 to 2023 in Oman were included in this study. We utilised principal component analysis (PCA) in the ML algorithms and compared them to the results of model performance without PCA. We employed and compared ten ML algorithms, including decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (xgboost), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Different metrics, including, accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and the F1- score, were utilised to assess Model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated that the RF model outperformed the other methods in predicting the risk level (low or high) with an accuracy of 75.2%, precision of 85.7% and F1- score of 73% after PCA was applied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We applied several machine learning models to predict maternal risk levels for the first time using real data from Oman. RF outperformed the other algorithms in this classification problem. A reliable estimate of maternal risk level would facilitate intervention plans for medical practitioners to reduce maternal death.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"24 1","pages":"820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-07030-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal morbidity and mortality remain critical health concerns globally. As a result, reducing the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is part of goal 3 in the global sustainable development goals (SDGs), and previously, it was an important indicator in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Therefore, identifying high-risk groups during pregnancy is crucial for decision-makers and medical practitioners to mitigate mortality and morbidity. However, the availability of accurate predictive models for maternal mortality and maternal health risks is challenging. Compared with traditional predictive models, machine learning algorithms have emerged as promising predictive modelling methods providing accurate predictive models.

Methods: This work aims to explore the potential of machine learning (ML) algorithms in maternal risk level prediction using a nationwide maternal mortality dataset from Oman for the first time. A total of 402 maternal deaths from 1991 to 2023 in Oman were included in this study. We utilised principal component analysis (PCA) in the ML algorithms and compared them to the results of model performance without PCA. We employed and compared ten ML algorithms, including decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Extreme Gradient Boosting (xgboost), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA), Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). Different metrics, including, accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and the F1- score, were utilised to assess Model performance.

Results: The results indicated that the RF model outperformed the other methods in predicting the risk level (low or high) with an accuracy of 75.2%, precision of 85.7% and F1- score of 73% after PCA was applied.

Conclusions: We applied several machine learning models to predict maternal risk levels for the first time using real data from Oman. RF outperformed the other algorithms in this classification problem. A reliable estimate of maternal risk level would facilitate intervention plans for medical practitioners to reduce maternal death.

使用机器学习模型预测产妇风险水平。
背景:孕产妇发病率和死亡率仍然是全球严重的健康问题。因此,降低孕产妇死亡率(MMR)是全球可持续发展目标(sdg)目标3的一部分,以前,它是千年发展目标(MDGs)的一个重要指标。因此,确定孕期高危人群对决策者和医生降低死亡率和发病率至关重要。然而,提供准确的孕产妇死亡率和孕产妇健康风险预测模型是一项挑战。与传统的预测模型相比,机器学习算法已经成为一种有前途的预测建模方法,可以提供准确的预测模型。方法:本工作旨在首次利用阿曼全国孕产妇死亡率数据集探索机器学习(ML)算法在孕产妇风险水平预测中的潜力。1991年至2023年期间,阿曼共有402例产妇死亡。我们在ML算法中使用主成分分析(PCA),并将它们与没有PCA的模型性能结果进行比较。我们采用并比较了十种机器学习算法,包括决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、k近邻(KNN)、Naïve贝叶斯(NB)、极端梯度增强(xgboost)、线性判别分析(LDA)、二次判别分析(QDA)、逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络(ANN)。不同的指标,包括准确性、灵敏度、精度和F1-评分,被用来评估模型的性能。结果:应用主成分分析(PCA)后,RF模型预测风险等级(低、高)的准确率为75.2%,精密度为85.7%,F1-评分为73%,优于其他方法。结论:我们首次使用来自阿曼的真实数据应用了几个机器学习模型来预测孕产妇风险水平。在这个分类问题中,RF优于其他算法。对产妇风险水平的可靠估计将有助于医生制定干预计划,以减少产妇死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信