Karnam Anand, Sai Sirisha, Sanjana Putta, Sudhindra Vooturi, Manas Panigrahi, Sita Jayalakshmi, Subhash Kaul
{"title":"Determinants of Caregiver Burden in Stroke Survivors who Underwent Decompressive Craniectomy.","authors":"Karnam Anand, Sai Sirisha, Sanjana Putta, Sudhindra Vooturi, Manas Panigrahi, Sita Jayalakshmi, Subhash Kaul","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_448_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>For stroke survivors (SS) who undergo decompressive craniectomy (DC), quality of life is intertwined with the care they receive. Burden on caregiver becomes an important determinant of recovery of SS. In this study, we aimed to analyze the determinants of burden on caregivers of SS who undergo DC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Caregivers of 198 SS who underwent DC formed the study population of this prospective observational study. The study was conducted in a tertiary referral unit between September 2019 and March 2021. Caregiver burden was quantified using Zarit Burden Interview. Analysis for association between the reported burden and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the participants was 47.00 ± 11.2 years. The mRS outcome was poor in SS aged >60 years, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score at presentation of <8, and in SS with bilateral/dominant hemisphere involvement. Outcome was better when DC was done ≤48 h (74.2% vs. 47.2%, P < 0.001) and if SS were shifted to a rehabilitation unit. Among caregivers, 58% and 16% reported to be always and frequently burdened, respectively; 33.3% of caregivers considered a retrospective review of consent for DC. A higher mRS score was associated with more burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early DC and care at rehabilitation unit were associated with better functional outcomes in SS. Nearly 75% of caregivers of patients post-DC reported high burden of providing care to SS, and the burden increased linearly with mRS score.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"647-650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_448_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: For stroke survivors (SS) who undergo decompressive craniectomy (DC), quality of life is intertwined with the care they receive. Burden on caregiver becomes an important determinant of recovery of SS. In this study, we aimed to analyze the determinants of burden on caregivers of SS who undergo DC.
Methods: Caregivers of 198 SS who underwent DC formed the study population of this prospective observational study. The study was conducted in a tertiary referral unit between September 2019 and March 2021. Caregiver burden was quantified using Zarit Burden Interview. Analysis for association between the reported burden and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score was done.
Results: Mean age of the participants was 47.00 ± 11.2 years. The mRS outcome was poor in SS aged >60 years, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score at presentation of <8, and in SS with bilateral/dominant hemisphere involvement. Outcome was better when DC was done ≤48 h (74.2% vs. 47.2%, P < 0.001) and if SS were shifted to a rehabilitation unit. Among caregivers, 58% and 16% reported to be always and frequently burdened, respectively; 33.3% of caregivers considered a retrospective review of consent for DC. A higher mRS score was associated with more burden.
Conclusion: Early DC and care at rehabilitation unit were associated with better functional outcomes in SS. Nearly 75% of caregivers of patients post-DC reported high burden of providing care to SS, and the burden increased linearly with mRS score.
期刊介绍:
The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.