Does amide proton transfer-weighted MRI have diagnostic and differential value in ovarian cystic and predominantly cystic lesion?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Dawei Ding, Lingyu Chang, Chunyan Men, Bo Yang, Dmytro Pylypenko, Tao Zhang, Dexin Yu, Fang Wang
{"title":"Does amide proton transfer-weighted MRI have diagnostic and differential value in ovarian cystic and predominantly cystic lesion?","authors":"Dawei Ding, Lingyu Chang, Chunyan Men, Bo Yang, Dmytro Pylypenko, Tao Zhang, Dexin Yu, Fang Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04768-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging in distinguishing cystic or predominantly cystic ovarian lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>49 patients underwent APTw imaging at 3T-MR before surgery, with 20 volunteers serving as the control group. Participants were divided into the following groups: solid components of normal ovaries (Group A, n = 29), solid components of malignant lesions (Group B, n = 7), cystic fluid of follicles (Group C, n = 31), cystic fluid of benign lesions (Group D, n = 46), functional cysts (Group d1, n = 8), endometriomas (Group d2, n = 28), cystadenomas (Group d3, n = 10), and cystic fluid of malignant lesions (Group E, n = 12). Independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests and one-way ANOVA were used to compare group differences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy in distinguishing between different lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For solid components, significant differences in MTRasym values were observed between Groups A and B (P < 0.001). For cystic components, significant differences were found between Groups C and D, C and E, d1 and d2, d2 and d3, d1 and d3, C and d2, C and d3, E and d1, and E and d2 (all P < 0.01). ROC analysis of these results showed high AUC values (ranging from 0.813 to 1.0), all P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>APTw can reveal differences in MTRasym values between normal and diseased ovarian tissues, demonstrating high clinical value in differentiating functional cysts, endometriomas, and cystadenomas, as well as distinguishing benign lesions (functional cysts or endometriomas) from malignant tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04768-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging in distinguishing cystic or predominantly cystic ovarian lesions.

Materials and methods: 49 patients underwent APTw imaging at 3T-MR before surgery, with 20 volunteers serving as the control group. Participants were divided into the following groups: solid components of normal ovaries (Group A, n = 29), solid components of malignant lesions (Group B, n = 7), cystic fluid of follicles (Group C, n = 31), cystic fluid of benign lesions (Group D, n = 46), functional cysts (Group d1, n = 8), endometriomas (Group d2, n = 28), cystadenomas (Group d3, n = 10), and cystic fluid of malignant lesions (Group E, n = 12). Independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests and one-way ANOVA were used to compare group differences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy in distinguishing between different lesions.

Results: For solid components, significant differences in MTRasym values were observed between Groups A and B (P < 0.001). For cystic components, significant differences were found between Groups C and D, C and E, d1 and d2, d2 and d3, d1 and d3, C and d2, C and d3, E and d1, and E and d2 (all P < 0.01). ROC analysis of these results showed high AUC values (ranging from 0.813 to 1.0), all P < 0.05.

Conclusions: APTw can reveal differences in MTRasym values between normal and diseased ovarian tissues, demonstrating high clinical value in differentiating functional cysts, endometriomas, and cystadenomas, as well as distinguishing benign lesions (functional cysts or endometriomas) from malignant tumors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信