Effect of fumigation, cover crops, and potato growth on shifts in soil microbial communities.

IF 8.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Julie Celini, Ruijun Qin, Shahram Torabian, Esther Kim, Yan Liu
{"title":"Effect of fumigation, cover crops, and potato growth on shifts in soil microbial communities.","authors":"Julie Celini, Ruijun Qin, Shahram Torabian, Esther Kim, Yan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fumigation as a broad-spectrum pesticide can affect both pathogenic and non-target microorganisms in the soil. As microbial communities are critical within the soil ecosystem, depletion of or changes in these communities can result in negative implications for soil health. Because cover crops are used to enhance soil health physically, chemically, and biologically, they might recover the soil health of the fumigated soil. However, little information is available on the interactive effect of these practices on soil health especially regarding the soil microbiome. This study was to investigate microbial community shifts as affected by fumigation and cover crops in different stages of potato field management practices. A year-long field test was conducted in Adkins sandy loam of Eastern Oregon following a split-plot design with fumigation as main plots and cover crops as subplots. Fumigation treatments included non-fumigated control, metam sodium, 1,3-dichloropropenene, and metam sodium+1,3-dichloropropenene. Soil samples were collected around the termination of cover crops and after potato harvesting for soil microbial analysis. 16S and ITS rRNA- gene sequencing analyses were employed to understand the prokaryote and eukaryote populations, respectively. Microbial community analysis indicated no significant interaction between the treatment conditions, with cover crops resulting in no significant shifts in the soil microbial community. Combination fumigation treatments (metam sodium+1,3-dichloropropenene) resulted in the largest community shifts for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities, with significant abundance changes in the bacterial phyla Acidobacteriota, Planctomycetota, and Verrucomicrobiota and the eukaryotic phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota compared with no fumigation control; and these changes did not repeat from cover crop planting, although subsequent years of study are needed to establish definitive trends in community shifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"958 ","pages":"178032"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fumigation as a broad-spectrum pesticide can affect both pathogenic and non-target microorganisms in the soil. As microbial communities are critical within the soil ecosystem, depletion of or changes in these communities can result in negative implications for soil health. Because cover crops are used to enhance soil health physically, chemically, and biologically, they might recover the soil health of the fumigated soil. However, little information is available on the interactive effect of these practices on soil health especially regarding the soil microbiome. This study was to investigate microbial community shifts as affected by fumigation and cover crops in different stages of potato field management practices. A year-long field test was conducted in Adkins sandy loam of Eastern Oregon following a split-plot design with fumigation as main plots and cover crops as subplots. Fumigation treatments included non-fumigated control, metam sodium, 1,3-dichloropropenene, and metam sodium+1,3-dichloropropenene. Soil samples were collected around the termination of cover crops and after potato harvesting for soil microbial analysis. 16S and ITS rRNA- gene sequencing analyses were employed to understand the prokaryote and eukaryote populations, respectively. Microbial community analysis indicated no significant interaction between the treatment conditions, with cover crops resulting in no significant shifts in the soil microbial community. Combination fumigation treatments (metam sodium+1,3-dichloropropenene) resulted in the largest community shifts for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities, with significant abundance changes in the bacterial phyla Acidobacteriota, Planctomycetota, and Verrucomicrobiota and the eukaryotic phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota compared with no fumigation control; and these changes did not repeat from cover crop planting, although subsequent years of study are needed to establish definitive trends in community shifts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信