Carbon and Energy Footprinting across Archetypes for U.S. Maple Syrup Production

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Spencer M. Checkoway, Geoffrey M. Lewis and Gregory A. Keoleian*, 
{"title":"Carbon and Energy Footprinting across Archetypes for U.S. Maple Syrup Production","authors":"Spencer M. Checkoway,&nbsp;Geoffrey M. Lewis and Gregory A. Keoleian*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c0306710.1021/acs.est.4c03067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The production of maple syrup from sap requires extensive processing, which has traditionally led to significant energy inputs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per gallon produced. Technology advancements, e.g., vacuum tubing sap collection systems, reverse osmosis (RO), and electric evaporators have changed the way syrup is produced, resulting in widespread variability in processing equipment and sugar-making operational decisions. This paper evaluates these complex operations through a cradle-to-retail gate carbon footprinting model and by capturing variability in a series of producer archetypes. By isolating energy and emissions impacts, we find that implementing RO has the largest reduction effect on energy (54–77%) and emissions (57–82%), depending on both production size and evaporator fuel (wood, fuel-oil, or electricity). Results also demonstrate the effect of production scale on cumulative energy demand (CED) and emissions per gallon of syrup, with small producers ranging from 333–1,425 MJ/gal and 27–118 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/gal (61–90% biogenic on-site) for wood-fired operations and 18–65 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/gal for oil-fired operations. Large producers ranged from 90–131 MJ and 3.5–7 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/gal (electricity to oil-fired operations). Producers of all scales with the highest rates of electrification in their operations have the lowest GHG emissions and energy use per gallon of syrup produced.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"58 49","pages":"21499–21509 21499–21509"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c03067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The production of maple syrup from sap requires extensive processing, which has traditionally led to significant energy inputs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per gallon produced. Technology advancements, e.g., vacuum tubing sap collection systems, reverse osmosis (RO), and electric evaporators have changed the way syrup is produced, resulting in widespread variability in processing equipment and sugar-making operational decisions. This paper evaluates these complex operations through a cradle-to-retail gate carbon footprinting model and by capturing variability in a series of producer archetypes. By isolating energy and emissions impacts, we find that implementing RO has the largest reduction effect on energy (54–77%) and emissions (57–82%), depending on both production size and evaporator fuel (wood, fuel-oil, or electricity). Results also demonstrate the effect of production scale on cumulative energy demand (CED) and emissions per gallon of syrup, with small producers ranging from 333–1,425 MJ/gal and 27–118 kg CO2e/gal (61–90% biogenic on-site) for wood-fired operations and 18–65 kg CO2e/gal for oil-fired operations. Large producers ranged from 90–131 MJ and 3.5–7 kg CO2e/gal (electricity to oil-fired operations). Producers of all scales with the highest rates of electrification in their operations have the lowest GHG emissions and energy use per gallon of syrup produced.

Abstract Image

美国枫糖浆生产原型的碳和能源足迹
从树液中生产枫糖浆需要大量的加工,这在传统上导致了大量的能源投入和每加仑生产的温室气体(GHG)排放。技术进步,如真空管液收集系统、反渗透(RO)和电动蒸发器,改变了糖浆的生产方式,导致加工设备和制糖操作决策的广泛变化。本文通过一个从摇篮到零售的碳足迹模型和捕捉一系列生产者原型的可变性来评估这些复杂的操作。通过隔离能源和排放影响,我们发现实施反渗透对能源(54-77%)和排放(57-82%)的减少效果最大,具体取决于生产规模和蒸发器燃料(木材、燃料油或电力)。结果还显示了生产规模对累积能源需求(CED)和每加仑糖浆排放量的影响,小型生产商的木材燃烧操作范围为333-1,425 MJ/gal, 27-118 kg CO2e/gal(61-90%的现场生物源),而石油燃烧操作范围为18-65 kg CO2e/gal。大型生产商的范围从90-131兆焦耳和3.5-7千克二氧化碳当量/加仑(电力到燃油操作)。电气化率最高的各种规模的生产商,其生产的每加仑糖浆的温室气体排放量和能源使用量最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信