No saturation of soil carbon under long-term extreme manure additions

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Henrike Heinemann, Axel Don, Christopher Poeplau, Ines Merbach, Thorsten Reinsch, Gerhard Welp, Cora Vos
{"title":"No saturation of soil carbon under long-term extreme manure additions","authors":"Henrike Heinemann, Axel Don, Christopher Poeplau, Ines Merbach, Thorsten Reinsch, Gerhard Welp, Cora Vos","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07146-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>According to the carbon (C) saturation concept, the capacity of soils to accumulate stabilized organic C is limited by the number of binding sites on mineral surfaces. The concept and its application are highly debated. Therefore, we aimed at testing this theory using field experimental data.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Soils were sampled from four long-term field experiments with different amounts of organic fertilisation going up to extreme high C inputs (20 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) five times higher than in common agricultural practice. Soils were fractionated by particle size to obtain sand-sized, coarse silt and fine silt plus clay fractions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We found a linear relation between C input and soil organic carbon stocks (SOC) even with vast amounts of organic C inputs to the soil at three experimental sites. Across all experiments, C stocks in the sand-sized fraction increased on average by 146%, whereas C stocks in the fine silt plus clay fraction (&lt; 20 µm) increased by just 17% without distinct saturation behaviour. The C sequestration efficiency (amount of C retained as SOC per amount of C input) tended to increase with initial SOC content which is not in line with the saturation theory.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The experiments were subject to C inputs via organic fertilisation that would and should rarely be reached in agricultural practice due to negative side effects. Even under these artificial conditions experiments did not show a distinct saturation behaviour.</p><p>Initial SOC stocks or SOC in the mineral-associated fraction did not appear to limit the potential of soils to sequester additional SOC. It can be concluded that C sequestration is mainly limited by the availability of C inputs from biomass.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07146-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

According to the carbon (C) saturation concept, the capacity of soils to accumulate stabilized organic C is limited by the number of binding sites on mineral surfaces. The concept and its application are highly debated. Therefore, we aimed at testing this theory using field experimental data.

Methods

Soils were sampled from four long-term field experiments with different amounts of organic fertilisation going up to extreme high C inputs (20 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) five times higher than in common agricultural practice. Soils were fractionated by particle size to obtain sand-sized, coarse silt and fine silt plus clay fractions.

Results

We found a linear relation between C input and soil organic carbon stocks (SOC) even with vast amounts of organic C inputs to the soil at three experimental sites. Across all experiments, C stocks in the sand-sized fraction increased on average by 146%, whereas C stocks in the fine silt plus clay fraction (< 20 µm) increased by just 17% without distinct saturation behaviour. The C sequestration efficiency (amount of C retained as SOC per amount of C input) tended to increase with initial SOC content which is not in line with the saturation theory.

Conclusion

The experiments were subject to C inputs via organic fertilisation that would and should rarely be reached in agricultural practice due to negative side effects. Even under these artificial conditions experiments did not show a distinct saturation behaviour.

Initial SOC stocks or SOC in the mineral-associated fraction did not appear to limit the potential of soils to sequester additional SOC. It can be concluded that C sequestration is mainly limited by the availability of C inputs from biomass.

背景和目的根据碳(C)饱和度概念,土壤积累稳定有机碳的能力受到矿物表面结合位点数量的限制。对这一概念及其应用存在很大争议。我们从四个长期田间试验中采集了土壤样本,试验中施用了不同数量的有机肥,最高达到了极高的碳输入量(20 兆碳/公顷-年-1),比普通农业实践高出五倍。结果我们发现,即使在三个实验点的土壤中施用了大量有机碳,碳输入量与土壤有机碳储量(SOC)之间仍存在线性关系。在所有实验中,沙粒大小部分的碳储量平均增加了 146%,而细粉砂加粘土部分(< 20 µm)的碳储量仅增加了 17%,没有明显的饱和行为。固碳效率(每投入一定量的碳,作为 SOC 留存的碳量)随着初始 SOC 含量的增加而增加,这与饱和理论不符。即使在这些人为条件下,实验也没有显示出明显的饱和行为。初始 SOC 储量或矿物相关部分中的 SOC 似乎并没有限制土壤固存额外 SOC 的潜力。由此可以得出结论,固碳主要受限于生物质的碳输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信