Differential diagnosis and comparison of diagnostic algorithms in children and adolescents with autoimmune encephalitis in Spain: a prospective cohort study and retrospective analysis

Gemma Olivé-Cirera, Elianet Fonseca, Li-Wen Chen, Anna Fetta, Eugenia Martínez-Hernández, Mar Guasp, Veronica González-Álvarez, Verónica Delgadillo, Verónica Cantarín-Extremera, María Jiménez-Legido, Lorena Monge-Galindo, Ana Felipe, Beatriz Beseler, Eulàlia Turón-Viñas, Joaquín Fernández-Ramos, Maria J Martínez-González, Maria Vázquez-López, Luisa Arrabal Fernandez, Mireia Alvarez-Molinero, Beatriz Muñoz-Cabello, Thaís Armangué
{"title":"Differential diagnosis and comparison of diagnostic algorithms in children and adolescents with autoimmune encephalitis in Spain: a prospective cohort study and retrospective analysis","authors":"Gemma Olivé-Cirera, Elianet Fonseca, Li-Wen Chen, Anna Fetta, Eugenia Martínez-Hernández, Mar Guasp, Veronica González-Álvarez, Verónica Delgadillo, Verónica Cantarín-Extremera, María Jiménez-Legido, Lorena Monge-Galindo, Ana Felipe, Beatriz Beseler, Eulàlia Turón-Viñas, Joaquín Fernández-Ramos, Maria J Martínez-González, Maria Vázquez-López, Luisa Arrabal Fernandez, Mireia Alvarez-Molinero, Beatriz Muñoz-Cabello, Thaís Armangué","doi":"10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00443-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>The usefulness of current diagnostic approaches in children with suspected autoimmune encephalitis is unknown. We aimed to assess the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice and to compare the performance of two international diagnostic algorithms (one intended for patients of any age [general], the other intended for paediatric patients), with particular emphasis on the evaluation of patients with probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis because this diagnosis suggests that immunotherapy should be continued or escalated but is difficult to establish.<h3>Methods</h3>We did a prospective cohort study that included all patients (&lt;18 years of age) with suspected autoimmune encephalitis recruited at 40 hospitals in Spain whose physicians provided clinical information every 6 months for 2 years or more. Neural antibody testing to confirm diagnosis of antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis was done at Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer-Hospital Clínic, Barcelona. Patients were classified according to the most probable diagnosis at last follow-up into four prespecified categories. We used multivariable logistic analysis to assess a potential association between immunotherapy and outcome in individuals with probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis. We also did a retrospective analysis of agreement, assessed with the kappa index, between diagnoses made according to the general and paediatric diagnostic algorithms.<h3>Findings</h3>Between June 1, 2013, and May 31, 2021, 729 children (mean age 7·1 years [SD 4·9]; 383 boys [53%], 346 girls [47%]) with suspected autoimmune encephalitis were recruited. After a median follow-up of 36 months (IQR 26–60), patients were classified according to their most probable diagnosis: definite autoimmune encephalitis or well defined inflammatory or autoimmune disorders (n=230 [32%]); CNS infections (n=112 [15%]); inflammatory CNS disorders of unknown cause (n=81 [11%], including three (4%) with a novel Klüver-Bucy-like syndrome; and non-inflammatory disorders (n=306 [42%]), which were predominantly epileptic or psychiatric disorders (177 [58%] of 306). Neural antibodies were detected in 150 (65%) of 230 patients who had definite autoimmune encephalitis; 127 (85%) of these 150 individuals had antibodies to the NMDA receptor or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). Agreement between algorithms was excellent (kappa index 0·99, 95% CI 0·97–1·00) for the diagnosis of children with antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis, good (0·59, 0·54–0·65) for recommendations of empiric immunotherapy, and poor (0·29, 0·21–0·37) for the diagnosis of probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis. Compared with the general algorithm, the paediatric algorithm included more patients in the probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis category (173 <em>vs</em> 41). These patients included some of those who had a diagnosis of CNS inflammatory disorder of unknown cause at the last follow-up (80 of 81 with the paediatric algorithm <em>vs</em> 31 of 81 with the general algorithm), who might have benefitted from immunotherapy, and some of those diagnosed with a non-inflammatory disorder at the last follow-up (47 of 306 with the paediatric algorithm <em>vs</em> six of 306 with the general algorithm), who did not need immunotherapy.<h3>Interpretation</h3>About a third of children with suspected autoimmune encephalitis eventually had confirmation of this diagnosis, or diagnosis of another well defined inflammatory disorder. Frequent mimics of autoimmune encephalitis were infectious, epileptic, and psychiatric disorders. Both algorithms performed well in the diagnosis of antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis, but the paediatric algorithm under-recognised definite autoimmune encephalitis that can occur without autoantibodies and might have overdiagnosed patients with probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis. By contrast, the general algorithm might have underdiagnosed patients with probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis. Given that the diagnosis of probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis has treatment implications, inaccuracies on this diagnostic category leads to overuse or underuse of immunotherapy.<h3>Funding</h3>Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica, The Edmond J Safra Foundation, and la Caixa Foundation.<h3>Translation</h3>For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.","PeriodicalId":22676,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Neurology","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00443-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The usefulness of current diagnostic approaches in children with suspected autoimmune encephalitis is unknown. We aimed to assess the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice and to compare the performance of two international diagnostic algorithms (one intended for patients of any age [general], the other intended for paediatric patients), with particular emphasis on the evaluation of patients with probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis because this diagnosis suggests that immunotherapy should be continued or escalated but is difficult to establish.

Methods

We did a prospective cohort study that included all patients (<18 years of age) with suspected autoimmune encephalitis recruited at 40 hospitals in Spain whose physicians provided clinical information every 6 months for 2 years or more. Neural antibody testing to confirm diagnosis of antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis was done at Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer-Hospital Clínic, Barcelona. Patients were classified according to the most probable diagnosis at last follow-up into four prespecified categories. We used multivariable logistic analysis to assess a potential association between immunotherapy and outcome in individuals with probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis. We also did a retrospective analysis of agreement, assessed with the kappa index, between diagnoses made according to the general and paediatric diagnostic algorithms.

Findings

Between June 1, 2013, and May 31, 2021, 729 children (mean age 7·1 years [SD 4·9]; 383 boys [53%], 346 girls [47%]) with suspected autoimmune encephalitis were recruited. After a median follow-up of 36 months (IQR 26–60), patients were classified according to their most probable diagnosis: definite autoimmune encephalitis or well defined inflammatory or autoimmune disorders (n=230 [32%]); CNS infections (n=112 [15%]); inflammatory CNS disorders of unknown cause (n=81 [11%], including three (4%) with a novel Klüver-Bucy-like syndrome; and non-inflammatory disorders (n=306 [42%]), which were predominantly epileptic or psychiatric disorders (177 [58%] of 306). Neural antibodies were detected in 150 (65%) of 230 patients who had definite autoimmune encephalitis; 127 (85%) of these 150 individuals had antibodies to the NMDA receptor or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). Agreement between algorithms was excellent (kappa index 0·99, 95% CI 0·97–1·00) for the diagnosis of children with antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis, good (0·59, 0·54–0·65) for recommendations of empiric immunotherapy, and poor (0·29, 0·21–0·37) for the diagnosis of probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis. Compared with the general algorithm, the paediatric algorithm included more patients in the probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis category (173 vs 41). These patients included some of those who had a diagnosis of CNS inflammatory disorder of unknown cause at the last follow-up (80 of 81 with the paediatric algorithm vs 31 of 81 with the general algorithm), who might have benefitted from immunotherapy, and some of those diagnosed with a non-inflammatory disorder at the last follow-up (47 of 306 with the paediatric algorithm vs six of 306 with the general algorithm), who did not need immunotherapy.

Interpretation

About a third of children with suspected autoimmune encephalitis eventually had confirmation of this diagnosis, or diagnosis of another well defined inflammatory disorder. Frequent mimics of autoimmune encephalitis were infectious, epileptic, and psychiatric disorders. Both algorithms performed well in the diagnosis of antibody-positive autoimmune encephalitis, but the paediatric algorithm under-recognised definite autoimmune encephalitis that can occur without autoantibodies and might have overdiagnosed patients with probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis. By contrast, the general algorithm might have underdiagnosed patients with probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis. Given that the diagnosis of probable antibody-negative autoimmune encephalitis has treatment implications, inaccuracies on this diagnostic category leads to overuse or underuse of immunotherapy.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica, The Edmond J Safra Foundation, and la Caixa Foundation.

Translation

For the Spanish translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信