Efficacy of forefoot scrubbing with bristled brush during foot and ankle surgery.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Shengxuan Cao, Yuan Sun, Shirong Li, Xin Ma, Chen Wang, Xu Wang
{"title":"Efficacy of forefoot scrubbing with bristled brush during foot and ankle surgery.","authors":"Shengxuan Cao, Yuan Sun, Shirong Li, Xin Ma, Chen Wang, Xu Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utility of forefoot cleaning using bristled brush has been proposed by previous studies but has not been tested in any study. The aim of the current study is to investigate the antiseptic efficacy of additional forefoot scrubbing with bristled brush after a standard 2-step preparation with alcohol and chlorhexidine in foot and ankle surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred patients underwent foot and ankle surgery by one orthopedic surgeon were included and categorized into one of two groups of different skin preparation procedure before surgery. Group 1 is the control group which received a standard 2-step preparation with alcohol and chlorhexidine. Group 2 is the forefoot scrubbing group which received a standard preparation with alcohol and chlorhexidine and an additional forefoot scrubbing in a sterile fashion. Positive culture results and microbe species were primary outcomes. A secondary outcome was the occurrence of any surgical site infection (SSI) 12 months following surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The hallux nail fold positive rate of the forefoot scrubbing group was significantly lower than that of the control group after draping (forefoot scrubbing group, 0 %; control group, 12 %; p = 0.027) and after surgery (forefoot scrubbing group, 6 %; control group, 28 %; p = 0.003). The microbe species of hallux nail fold after surgery included Staphylococcus, coagulase negative, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus luteus, Neisseria, and Corynebacterium afermentans. There was no difference in the rate of SSI between the forefoot scrubbing group (10 %) and the control group (6 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Forefoot scrubbing with bristled brush before foot and ankle surgery reduces microbe growth rate after draping and after surgery at hallux nail fold.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level II, prospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.12.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The utility of forefoot cleaning using bristled brush has been proposed by previous studies but has not been tested in any study. The aim of the current study is to investigate the antiseptic efficacy of additional forefoot scrubbing with bristled brush after a standard 2-step preparation with alcohol and chlorhexidine in foot and ankle surgery.

Methods: One hundred patients underwent foot and ankle surgery by one orthopedic surgeon were included and categorized into one of two groups of different skin preparation procedure before surgery. Group 1 is the control group which received a standard 2-step preparation with alcohol and chlorhexidine. Group 2 is the forefoot scrubbing group which received a standard preparation with alcohol and chlorhexidine and an additional forefoot scrubbing in a sterile fashion. Positive culture results and microbe species were primary outcomes. A secondary outcome was the occurrence of any surgical site infection (SSI) 12 months following surgery.

Results: The hallux nail fold positive rate of the forefoot scrubbing group was significantly lower than that of the control group after draping (forefoot scrubbing group, 0 %; control group, 12 %; p = 0.027) and after surgery (forefoot scrubbing group, 6 %; control group, 28 %; p = 0.003). The microbe species of hallux nail fold after surgery included Staphylococcus, coagulase negative, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus luteus, Neisseria, and Corynebacterium afermentans. There was no difference in the rate of SSI between the forefoot scrubbing group (10 %) and the control group (6 %).

Conclusion: Forefoot scrubbing with bristled brush before foot and ankle surgery reduces microbe growth rate after draping and after surgery at hallux nail fold.

Level of evidence: Level II, prospective cohort study.

在足部和踝关节手术中用毛刷前足擦洗的效果。
背景:使用刚毛刷清洁前足的效用已被先前的研究提出,但尚未在任何研究中进行测试。本研究的目的是调查足部和踝关节手术中,在用酒精和氯己定进行标准两步准备后,用刚毛刷额外擦洗前足的防腐效果。方法:选取1位骨科医师行足、踝部手术的100例患者,将其分为术前皮肤准备程序不同的两组。第一组为对照组,接受酒精和氯己定的标准两步制剂。第2组为前足擦洗组,接受含酒精和氯己定的标准制剂,并以无菌方式进行额外的前足擦洗。阳性培养结果和微生物种类是主要结果。次要结果是手术后12个月发生任何手术部位感染(SSI)。结果:悬垂后前足刷洗组拇甲折叠阳性率显著低于对照组(前足刷洗组,0 %;对照组,12 %;P = 0.027)和术后(前足刷洗组,6 %;对照组,28% %; = 0.003页)。术后拇甲褶的微生物种类包括葡萄球菌、凝固酶阴性、金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌、黄体微球菌、奈瑟菌、发酵棒状杆菌。前足擦洗组(10 %)和对照组(6 %)的SSI发生率无差异。结论:足踝手术前用毛刷前足刷洗可降低悬垂后及手术后拇甲襞微生物生长速率。证据等级:II级,前瞻性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信