Comparison between intratympanic injection of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A randomized clinical trial

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Kourosh Eftekharian MD, MPH, Elnaz Najafi MD, Maryam Amizadeh MD, Noosheen Mokari MS, Mohammad Faramarzi MD, Yalda Izadparast MD, Yalda Jabbari Moghadam MD, Ali Eftekharian MD
{"title":"Comparison between intratympanic injection of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Kourosh Eftekharian MD, MPH,&nbsp;Elnaz Najafi MD,&nbsp;Maryam Amizadeh MD,&nbsp;Noosheen Mokari MS,&nbsp;Mohammad Faramarzi MD,&nbsp;Yalda Izadparast MD,&nbsp;Yalda Jabbari Moghadam MD,&nbsp;Ali Eftekharian MD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the hearing outcomes of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss after intratympanic (IT) injection of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Randomized case-controlled clinical trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-five patients diagnosed with idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss were randomly divided into two groups based on therapy. Both groups received oral prednisolone (10 mg/kg; maximum of 60 mg) for 10 days without tapering and received IT injections two times a week for 2 weeks (four injections in total). One group received an IT injection of a 40 mg/mL solution of methylprednisolone, and the other one, 4 mg/mL dexamethasone. Three comparisons between the initial and third-month hearing tests were made to assess the degree of hearing change: (1) pure tone improvement in each individual tone (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz); (2) word-recognition score improvement; and (3) complete, partial, and no recovery of hearing calculated (as defined by American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study was completed with 69 of the 75 patients—34 in the methylprednisolone group and 35 in the dexamethasone group. The groups' differences in frequency-specific hearing improvement were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the word recognition score improvement between the two groups. Additionally, there was no discernible difference between the two groups' hearing recovery rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Methylprednisolone and dexamethasone IT injection therapy had similar hearing outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of evidence</h3>\n \n <p>2.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To compare the hearing outcomes of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss after intratympanic (IT) injection of methylprednisolone and dexamethasone.

Study design

Randomized case-controlled clinical trial.

Methods

Seventy-five patients diagnosed with idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss were randomly divided into two groups based on therapy. Both groups received oral prednisolone (10 mg/kg; maximum of 60 mg) for 10 days without tapering and received IT injections two times a week for 2 weeks (four injections in total). One group received an IT injection of a 40 mg/mL solution of methylprednisolone, and the other one, 4 mg/mL dexamethasone. Three comparisons between the initial and third-month hearing tests were made to assess the degree of hearing change: (1) pure tone improvement in each individual tone (0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 kHz); (2) word-recognition score improvement; and (3) complete, partial, and no recovery of hearing calculated (as defined by American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines).

Results

The study was completed with 69 of the 75 patients—34 in the methylprednisolone group and 35 in the dexamethasone group. The groups' differences in frequency-specific hearing improvement were not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the word recognition score improvement between the two groups. Additionally, there was no discernible difference between the two groups' hearing recovery rates.

Conclusion

Methylprednisolone and dexamethasone IT injection therapy had similar hearing outcomes.

Level of evidence

2.

Abstract Image

鼓室内注射地塞米松和甲基强的松龙治疗特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失的比较:一项随机临床试验。
目的:比较特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失患者鼓室内注射甲基强的松龙和地塞米松后的听力结果。研究设计:随机病例对照临床试验。方法:75例特发性感音神经性听力损失患者根据治疗方法随机分为两组。两组均口服强的松龙(10 mg/kg;最多60毫克),连续10天,不逐渐减少,每周注射两次,连续2周(共注射4次)。一组注射40 mg/mL甲基强的松龙溶液,另一组注射4 mg/mL地塞米松溶液。在最初和第三个月的听力测试之间进行了三次比较,以评估听力变化的程度:(1)每个单音(0.5、1、2、3和4 kHz)的纯音改善;(2)提高单词识别分数;(3)听力完全恢复、部分恢复和未恢复(根据美国耳鼻喉头颈外科临床实践指南定义)。结果:75例患者中有69例完成了研究,其中甲基强的松龙组34例,地塞米松组35例。两组在频率特异性听力改善方面的差异无统计学意义。两组在单词识别得分的改善上无统计学差异。此外,两组的听力恢复率没有明显差异。结论:甲强的松龙与地塞米松IT注射治疗听力效果相近。证据等级:2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信