If it is a solid tumor target, then it may be a hematologic cancer target: Bridging the great divide.

Abstract

Tumor-agnostic US Food and Drug Administration approvals are transforming oncology. They include larotrectinib/entrectinib/repotrectinib (NTRK fusions), selpercatinib (RET fusions), dabrafenib/trametinib (BRAF^V600E mutations), pembrolizumab/dostarlimab (microsatellite instability), pembrolizumab (high tumor mutational burden), and trastuzumab deruxtecan (HER2 3+ expression) (all solid cancers). Pemigatinib is approved for FGFR1-rearranged myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms. The genomically driven tissue-agnostic approach has a strong biological rationale (cancer is a disease of the genome), yields remarkably high response rates, and provides drug access to patients with an unmet need (rare/ultra-rare malignancies). Despite the solid tumor focus, both solid and hematologic cancers can harbor identical driver molecular abnormalities and respond to cognate therapies. For example, BRAF^V600E and IDH1/2 mutations; ALK, FGFR, and NTRK fusions; PD-L1 amplification; and CD70 antigens are druggable in both solid and blood malignancies by gene-/immune-targeted therapies/chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Future biomarker-based tissue-agnostic basket studies/approvals should bridge the great divide and include both solid and hematologic cancers.