Role of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs as a Protective Factor in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 0.9 3区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neurology India Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.4103/ni.ni_1073_22
Akash Asthana, Shashank Tripathi, Rachna Agarwal
{"title":"Role of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs as a Protective Factor in Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Akash Asthana, Shashank Tripathi, Rachna Agarwal","doi":"10.4103/ni.ni_1073_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major neurodegenerative disease, affecting more than two-third cases of dementia in the world. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used anti-inflammatory analgesic agents, representing 7.7% of worldwide prescriptions, of which 90% are in patients over 65 years old. Based on mixed findings by different randomized clinical trials (RCTs), a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to develop a better understanding of the protective role of NSAIDs in AD. Database search was Pubmed, WebScience, and Embase. RCTs investigating the effect of NSAIDs on AD or test scores assessing cognitive function in people without AD at baseline were included. Two indicators were the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score and Hazard Ratio. 09 studies were included in the present Meta-analysis. For the MMSE score difference, the pooled effect size was - 0.06 (-0.22, 0.10) which was not statistically significant (P value = 0.47). For the MMSE score, the pooled effect size was - 0.0036(-0.0320, 0.0248), which was also not statistically significant (P value = 0.87). For Hazard Ratio (HR), the pooled HR calculated using the random effect model was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.51), which was not statistically significant (P value = 0.15). Present meta-analysis shows that NSAIDs, in general, are not effective in the treatment of AD. They also have no protective effect against the development of AD on their sustained use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19429,"journal":{"name":"Neurology India","volume":"72 6","pages":"1144-1151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology India","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ni.ni_1073_22","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major neurodegenerative disease, affecting more than two-third cases of dementia in the world. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used anti-inflammatory analgesic agents, representing 7.7% of worldwide prescriptions, of which 90% are in patients over 65 years old. Based on mixed findings by different randomized clinical trials (RCTs), a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to develop a better understanding of the protective role of NSAIDs in AD. Database search was Pubmed, WebScience, and Embase. RCTs investigating the effect of NSAIDs on AD or test scores assessing cognitive function in people without AD at baseline were included. Two indicators were the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score and Hazard Ratio. 09 studies were included in the present Meta-analysis. For the MMSE score difference, the pooled effect size was - 0.06 (-0.22, 0.10) which was not statistically significant (P value = 0.47). For the MMSE score, the pooled effect size was - 0.0036(-0.0320, 0.0248), which was also not statistically significant (P value = 0.87). For Hazard Ratio (HR), the pooled HR calculated using the random effect model was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.51), which was not statistically significant (P value = 0.15). Present meta-analysis shows that NSAIDs, in general, are not effective in the treatment of AD. They also have no protective effect against the development of AD on their sustained use.

非甾体抗炎药作为阿尔茨海默病保护因素的作用:系统综述和荟萃分析
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种主要的神经退行性疾病,影响着世界上超过三分之二的痴呆症病例。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)是广泛使用的抗炎镇痛药,占全球处方的7.7%,其中90%用于65岁以上的患者。基于不同随机临床试验(RCTs)的混合结果,进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以更好地了解非甾体抗炎药对AD的保护作用。数据库搜索是Pubmed, WebScience和Embase。研究非甾体抗炎药对阿尔茨海默病的影响的随机对照试验或评估基线时无阿尔茨海默病患者认知功能的测试分数。两项指标为最小精神状态检查(MMSE)评分和风险比。本meta分析纳入了09项研究。MMSE评分差异,合并效应量为- 0.06(-0.22,0.10),无统计学意义(P值= 0.47)。对于MMSE评分,合并效应量为- 0.0036(-0.0320,0.0248),也无统计学意义(P值= 0.87)。对于风险比(HR),采用随机效应模型计算的合并HR为1.20 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.51),差异无统计学意义(P值= 0.15)。目前的荟萃分析显示,一般来说,非甾体抗炎药对阿尔茨海默病的治疗无效。他们也没有保护作用,防止发展的阿尔茨海默病的持续使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology India
Neurology India 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
70.40%
发文量
434
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Neurology India (ISSN 0028-3886) is Bi-monthly publication of Neurological Society of India. Neurology India, the show window of the progress of Neurological Sciences in India, has successfully completed 50 years of publication in the year 2002. ‘Neurology India’, along with the Neurological Society of India, has grown stronger with the passing of every year. The full articles of the journal are now available on internet with more than 20000 visitors in a month and the journal is indexed in MEDLINE and Index Medicus, Current Contents, Neuroscience Citation Index and EMBASE in addition to 10 other indexing avenues. This specialty journal reaches to about 2000 neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-psychiatrists, and others working in the fields of neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信