{"title":"Selective coronary arteriography via transradial access in young children.","authors":"Yasuto Maeda, Tadashi Inoue, Yoshiyuki Kagiyama, Ryuta Takase, Yusuke Koteda, Kenji Suda","doi":"10.1111/ped.15841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transradial access (TRA) is not a common vascular access in children. We have been performing TRA actively to reduce puncture complications, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of TRA in young children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 29 patients aged 5-12 years who underwent diagnostic catheterization at Kurume University Hospital. Vascular access was placed through TRA in 11 of these patients and through transfemoral access (TFA) in 18 patients with comparable ages. We compared TRA with TFA using various demographic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of TRA was 10 years (5-12 years) and that of TFA was 7 years (5-11 years). They were not significantly different. Transradial access showed an acceptably high success rate (91%), which was comparable with that of TFA (100%), although we had to switch to TFA in one patient in which the radial artery diameter was too small to puncture and due to failure of appropriate sedation and local anesthesia. A comparison between the two groups showed no significant differences in weight, puncture success rate, total time to completion of both arterial and venous puncture, or fluoroscopy time. However, none of the patients with TRA required post-catheter bed rest after removal of the arterial sheath, whereas patients with TFA required 6 h of bed rest. Although there were no puncture complications in group TRA, one patient with TFA had a subcutaneous hematoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transradial access can be performed safely in young children and may be more beneficial than TFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":20039,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics International","volume":"66 1","pages":"e15841"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.15841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Transradial access (TRA) is not a common vascular access in children. We have been performing TRA actively to reduce puncture complications, and the purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of TRA in young children.
Methods: The study included 29 patients aged 5-12 years who underwent diagnostic catheterization at Kurume University Hospital. Vascular access was placed through TRA in 11 of these patients and through transfemoral access (TFA) in 18 patients with comparable ages. We compared TRA with TFA using various demographic data.
Results: The median age of TRA was 10 years (5-12 years) and that of TFA was 7 years (5-11 years). They were not significantly different. Transradial access showed an acceptably high success rate (91%), which was comparable with that of TFA (100%), although we had to switch to TFA in one patient in which the radial artery diameter was too small to puncture and due to failure of appropriate sedation and local anesthesia. A comparison between the two groups showed no significant differences in weight, puncture success rate, total time to completion of both arterial and venous puncture, or fluoroscopy time. However, none of the patients with TRA required post-catheter bed rest after removal of the arterial sheath, whereas patients with TFA required 6 h of bed rest. Although there were no puncture complications in group TRA, one patient with TFA had a subcutaneous hematoma.
Conclusion: Transradial access can be performed safely in young children and may be more beneficial than TFA.
期刊介绍:
Publishing articles of scientific excellence in pediatrics and child health delivery, Pediatrics International aims to encourage those involved in the research, practice and delivery of child health to share their experiences, ideas and achievements. Formerly Acta Paediatrica Japonica, the change in name in 1999 to Pediatrics International, reflects the Journal''s international status both in readership and contributions (approximately 45% of articles published are from non-Japanese authors). The Editors continue their strong commitment to the sharing of scientific information for the benefit of children everywhere.
Pediatrics International opens the door to all authors throughout the world. Manuscripts are judged by two experts solely upon the basis of their contribution of original data, original ideas and their presentation.