Prevalence and Predictors of Concomitant Bacterial Infections in Patients With Respiratory Viruses in Ontario: A Cohort Study.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae701
Yue Wang, Sarah Swayze, Kevin A Brown, Derek R MacFadden, Samantha M Lee, Kevin L Schwartz, Nick Daneman, Bradley J Langford
{"title":"Prevalence and Predictors of Concomitant Bacterial Infections in Patients With Respiratory Viruses in Ontario: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Yue Wang, Sarah Swayze, Kevin A Brown, Derek R MacFadden, Samantha M Lee, Kevin L Schwartz, Nick Daneman, Bradley J Langford","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the prevalence of concomitant bacterial infection across common viral infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based cohort study included patients infected with influenza A and B (FLUA, FLUB) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Ontario between 2017 and 2019 and patients with SARS-CoV-2 between 2020 and 2021. Specific bacteria present in concomitant infections were identified. Concomitant infections were further classified into different categories (eg, coinfection -2 to +2 days from viral infection and secondary infection >2 days after viral infection). We used logistic regression models to estimate the odds of bacterial infections for FLUA, FLUB, and RSV relative to SARS-CoV-2 while adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4230 (0.5%, 885 004) viral cases had concomitant bacterial infections, encompassing 422 of FLUB (4.7%, 8891), 861 of FLUA (3.9%, 22 313), 428 of RSV (3.4%, 12 774), and 2519 of COVID-19 (0.3%, 841 026). The most prevalent species causing concomitant bacterial infection were <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i>, and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. When compared with SARS-CoV-2, the adjusted odds ratio for bacterial infection was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.48-1.93) for FLUA, 2.30 (95% CI, 1.97-2.69) for FLUB, and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.33-1.82) for RSV. The adjusted odds of coinfection in patients with SARS-CoV-2 were lower but higher for secondary infection as compared with the other viruses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher prevalence and risk of concomitant bacterial infection were found in FLUA, FLUB, and RSV as compared with SARS-CoV-2, although this is largely driven by coinfections. Ongoing surveillance efforts are needed to compare the risk of concomitant infections during periods when these viruses are cocirculating.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"11 12","pages":"ofae701"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To investigate the prevalence of concomitant bacterial infection across common viral infections.

Methods: This population-based cohort study included patients infected with influenza A and B (FLUA, FLUB) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in Ontario between 2017 and 2019 and patients with SARS-CoV-2 between 2020 and 2021. Specific bacteria present in concomitant infections were identified. Concomitant infections were further classified into different categories (eg, coinfection -2 to +2 days from viral infection and secondary infection >2 days after viral infection). We used logistic regression models to estimate the odds of bacterial infections for FLUA, FLUB, and RSV relative to SARS-CoV-2 while adjusting for confounders.

Results: A total of 4230 (0.5%, 885 004) viral cases had concomitant bacterial infections, encompassing 422 of FLUB (4.7%, 8891), 861 of FLUA (3.9%, 22 313), 428 of RSV (3.4%, 12 774), and 2519 of COVID-19 (0.3%, 841 026). The most prevalent species causing concomitant bacterial infection were Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. When compared with SARS-CoV-2, the adjusted odds ratio for bacterial infection was 1.69 (95% CI, 1.48-1.93) for FLUA, 2.30 (95% CI, 1.97-2.69) for FLUB, and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.33-1.82) for RSV. The adjusted odds of coinfection in patients with SARS-CoV-2 were lower but higher for secondary infection as compared with the other viruses.

Conclusions: A higher prevalence and risk of concomitant bacterial infection were found in FLUA, FLUB, and RSV as compared with SARS-CoV-2, although this is largely driven by coinfections. Ongoing surveillance efforts are needed to compare the risk of concomitant infections during periods when these viruses are cocirculating.

安大略省呼吸道病毒患者并发细菌感染的患病率和预测因素:一项队列研究
背景:调查常见病毒感染中并发细菌感染的发生率。方法:这项基于人群的队列研究包括2017年至2019年安大略省感染甲型和乙型流感(FLUA, FLUB)和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)的患者和2020年至2021年感染SARS-CoV-2的患者。确定了伴随感染中存在的特定细菌。合并感染进一步分为不同类型(如病毒感染后2 ~ +2天合并感染和病毒感染后2天继发感染)。我们使用逻辑回归模型来估计FLUA、FLUB和RSV细菌感染相对于SARS-CoV-2的几率,同时调整混杂因素。结果:共有4230例(0.5%,885 004例)病毒合并细菌感染,其中FLUB感染422例(4.7%,8891例),FLUA感染861例(3.9%,22 313例),RSV感染428例(3.4%,12 774例),COVID-19感染2519例(0.3%,841 026例)。引起并发细菌感染的最常见菌种是金黄色葡萄球菌、化脓性链球菌和铜绿假单胞菌。与SARS-CoV-2相比,FLUA细菌感染的校正优势比为1.69 (95% CI, 1.48-1.93), FLUB为2.30 (95% CI, 1.97-2.69), RSV为1.56 (95% CI, 1.33-1.82)。与其他病毒相比,SARS-CoV-2患者合并感染的调整后几率较低,但继发感染的调整后几率较高。结论:与SARS-CoV-2相比,FLUA、FLUB和RSV合并细菌感染的患病率和风险更高,尽管这主要是由合并感染引起的。需要进行持续的监测工作,以比较这些病毒共同传播期间合并感染的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信