Adequacy of oral intakes after cardiac surgery within an ERAS pathway: A prospective observational study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Bianca Beaulieu, Yoan Lamarche, Nicolas Rousseau-Saine, Guylaine Ferland
{"title":"Adequacy of oral intakes after cardiac surgery within an ERAS pathway: A prospective observational study.","authors":"Bianca Beaulieu, Yoan Lamarche, Nicolas Rousseau-Saine, Guylaine Ferland","doi":"10.1002/ncp.11258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2019 Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) guidelines presented perioperative recommendations to optimize treatment for patients undergoing cardiac surgery (CS). However, the guidelines have not established postoperative nutrition recommendations. Limited studies have analyzed oral intakes after CS, but to our knowledge, none have done so in an ERACS pathway. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of postoperative oral intakes, including adherence to oral nutrition supplements (ONSs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an observational prospective study. Postoperative oral intakes were analyzed from postoperative day (POD) 1 to 4, using direct observation of meal plates provided by the hospital. ONSs consumption was evaluated from POD2 to POD4. Adherence to other ERACS recommendations, including nutrition optimization before surgery, was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three patients were included in this study. Nutrition optimization before CS was offered to three (7%) patients. Forty-one (95%) patients resumed oral intakes on POD1. Mean oral calorie and protein intakes from POD2 to POD4 were 1088 ± 437 kcal and 0.8 ± 0.3 g/kg, respectively; however, 17 (41%) patients had calorie and protein intakes ≥70% of their estimated requirements. On POD2, ONSs consumption contributed 35% ± 19% and 38% ± 20% of calorie and protein intake, respectively. There was a significant decrease in ONSs consumption starting on POD3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within an ERACS pathway and with the contribution of ONSs, 41% of patients achieved sufficient oral intakes within the first 4 days after CS. The optimization of ONSs adherence on postoperative oral intakes should be further studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.11258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2019 Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS) guidelines presented perioperative recommendations to optimize treatment for patients undergoing cardiac surgery (CS). However, the guidelines have not established postoperative nutrition recommendations. Limited studies have analyzed oral intakes after CS, but to our knowledge, none have done so in an ERACS pathway. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of postoperative oral intakes, including adherence to oral nutrition supplements (ONSs).

Methods: This was an observational prospective study. Postoperative oral intakes were analyzed from postoperative day (POD) 1 to 4, using direct observation of meal plates provided by the hospital. ONSs consumption was evaluated from POD2 to POD4. Adherence to other ERACS recommendations, including nutrition optimization before surgery, was recorded.

Results: Forty-three patients were included in this study. Nutrition optimization before CS was offered to three (7%) patients. Forty-one (95%) patients resumed oral intakes on POD1. Mean oral calorie and protein intakes from POD2 to POD4 were 1088 ± 437 kcal and 0.8 ± 0.3 g/kg, respectively; however, 17 (41%) patients had calorie and protein intakes ≥70% of their estimated requirements. On POD2, ONSs consumption contributed 35% ± 19% and 38% ± 20% of calorie and protein intake, respectively. There was a significant decrease in ONSs consumption starting on POD3.

Conclusion: Within an ERACS pathway and with the contribution of ONSs, 41% of patients achieved sufficient oral intakes within the first 4 days after CS. The optimization of ONSs adherence on postoperative oral intakes should be further studied.

背景:2019 年心脏手术后强化恢复(ERACS)指南提出了围手术期建议,以优化心脏手术(CS)患者的治疗。然而,该指南并未制定术后营养建议。有限的研究对 CS 术后的口服摄入量进行了分析,但据我们所知,没有一项研究是在 ERACS 途径中进行的。本研究的主要目的是评估术后口腔摄入量的充足性,包括口腔营养补充剂(ONS)的依从性:这是一项前瞻性观察研究。通过直接观察医院提供的餐盘,分析了术后第 1 至 4 天的口腔摄入量。从 POD2 到 POD4,对 ONS 的消耗量进行了评估。此外,还记录了ERACS其他建议的遵守情况,包括术前营养优化:本研究共纳入 43 名患者。有三名(7%)患者在手术前接受了营养优化治疗。41名患者(95%)在POD1恢复了口服摄入。从 POD2 到 POD4,平均口服热量和蛋白质摄入量分别为 1088 ± 437 千卡和 0.8 ± 0.3 克/千克;但有 17 例(41%)患者的热量和蛋白质摄入量≥其估计需求量的 70%。在 POD2,ONS 的摄入量分别占卡路里和蛋白质摄入量的 35% ± 19% 和 38% ± 20%。从POD3开始,ONSs的摄入量明显减少:结论:在 ERACS 路径下,由于 ONSs 的贡献,41% 的患者在 CS 后的前 4 天内达到了足够的口服摄入量。应进一步研究坚持服用 ONSs 对术后口服摄入量的优化作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信