Diagnostic Utility of Clinical Neurophysiology in Jerky Movement Disorders: A Review from the MDS Clinical Neurophysiology Study Group.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1002/mdc3.14306
Anna Latorre, Christos Ganos, Masashi Hamada, Nicolas Phielipp, Lorenzo Rocchi, Shabbir Merchant, Marina A Tijssen, Sterre van der Veen, Robert Chen
{"title":"Diagnostic Utility of Clinical Neurophysiology in Jerky Movement Disorders: A Review from the MDS Clinical Neurophysiology Study Group.","authors":"Anna Latorre, Christos Ganos, Masashi Hamada, Nicolas Phielipp, Lorenzo Rocchi, Shabbir Merchant, Marina A Tijssen, Sterre van der Veen, Robert Chen","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myoclonus and other jerky movement disorders are hyperkinetic disorders, the diagnosis of which heavily relies on clinical neurophysiological testing. However, formal diagnostic criteria are lacking, and recently the utility and reliability of these tests have been questioned.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this review was to assess the utilization of clinical neurophysiology testing to identify possible gaps and boundaries that might guide the development of new methods for a more precise diagnosis and in-depth understanding of myoclonus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed electrophysiological features of cortical myoclonus, subcortical myoclonus (ie, myoclonus associated with dystonia, brainstem myoclonus), excessive startle reflex, spinal myoclonus (ie, spinal segmental and propriospinal myoclonus), peripheral myoclonus and mimics of myoclonus of peripheral origin (hemifacial spasm, minipolymyoclonus, myokymia), functional jerky movements, chorea, and tics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Electrophysiological features that support the recognition of myoclonus subtypes, such as muscle burst duration, muscle pattern of activation, measures of cortical excitability, or movement-related cortical potentials, have been identified. These significantly contribute to the diagnosis of jerky movement disorders, but their reliability is uncertain. Despite the significant advancements, several unresolved questions persist. Factors contributing to this include the absence of systematic neurophysiological assessment and standardized methods, alongside the limited number of patients investigated using these techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although clinical neurophysiology remains the \"gold standard\" for defining and diagnosing myoclonus, our review highlighted the need to enhance the quality and reliability of neurophysiological testing in jerky movement disorders. Further studies including larger cohorts of patients recruited from different centers, employing standardized and optimized electrophysiological techniques, are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"272-284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Myoclonus and other jerky movement disorders are hyperkinetic disorders, the diagnosis of which heavily relies on clinical neurophysiological testing. However, formal diagnostic criteria are lacking, and recently the utility and reliability of these tests have been questioned.

Objective: The aim of this review was to assess the utilization of clinical neurophysiology testing to identify possible gaps and boundaries that might guide the development of new methods for a more precise diagnosis and in-depth understanding of myoclonus.

Methods: We reviewed electrophysiological features of cortical myoclonus, subcortical myoclonus (ie, myoclonus associated with dystonia, brainstem myoclonus), excessive startle reflex, spinal myoclonus (ie, spinal segmental and propriospinal myoclonus), peripheral myoclonus and mimics of myoclonus of peripheral origin (hemifacial spasm, minipolymyoclonus, myokymia), functional jerky movements, chorea, and tics.

Results: Electrophysiological features that support the recognition of myoclonus subtypes, such as muscle burst duration, muscle pattern of activation, measures of cortical excitability, or movement-related cortical potentials, have been identified. These significantly contribute to the diagnosis of jerky movement disorders, but their reliability is uncertain. Despite the significant advancements, several unresolved questions persist. Factors contributing to this include the absence of systematic neurophysiological assessment and standardized methods, alongside the limited number of patients investigated using these techniques.

Conclusion: Although clinical neurophysiology remains the "gold standard" for defining and diagnosing myoclonus, our review highlighted the need to enhance the quality and reliability of neurophysiological testing in jerky movement disorders. Further studies including larger cohorts of patients recruited from different centers, employing standardized and optimized electrophysiological techniques, are warranted.

临床神经生理学在干性运动障碍诊断中的应用:MDS临床神经生理学研究组综述。
背景:肌阵挛和其他运动性运动障碍是一种多动障碍,其诊断严重依赖于临床神经生理检查。然而,缺乏正式的诊断标准,最近这些测试的效用和可靠性受到质疑。目的:本综述的目的是评估临床神经生理学测试的应用,以确定可能的差距和界限,从而指导开发更精确诊断和深入了解肌阵挛的新方法。方法:我们回顾了皮质肌阵挛、皮质下肌阵挛(即与肌张力障碍相关的肌阵挛、脑干肌阵挛)、过度惊吓反射、脊髓肌阵挛(即脊柱节段性和本体性肌阵挛)、外周肌阵挛和外周源性肌阵挛的模拟(面肌痉挛、小多发性肌阵挛、肌萎缩症)、功能性抽搐运动、舞蹈病和抽搐的电生理特征。结果:支持识别肌阵挛亚型的电生理特征,如肌肉爆发持续时间、肌肉激活模式、皮质兴奋性测量或运动相关的皮质电位,已经被确定。这些显著有助于干性运动障碍的诊断,但其可靠性是不确定的。尽管取得了重大进展,但仍存在一些未解决的问题。造成这种情况的因素包括缺乏系统的神经生理学评估和标准化方法,以及使用这些技术调查的患者数量有限。结论:尽管临床神经生理学仍然是定义和诊断肌阵挛的“金标准”,但我们的综述强调需要提高干性运动障碍神经生理学检测的质量和可靠性。进一步的研究包括从不同中心招募的更大的患者队列,采用标准化和优化的电生理技术,是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信