On the consequences of intra-operative release versus over-tensioning of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty.

IF 3.7 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Journal of The Royal Society Interface Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1098/rsif.2024.0588
Seyyed Hamed Hosseini Nasab, Sabrina Hörmann, Thomas M Grupp, William R Taylor, Allan Maas
{"title":"On the consequences of intra-operative release versus over-tensioning of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Seyyed Hamed Hosseini Nasab, Sabrina Hörmann, Thomas M Grupp, William R Taylor, Allan Maas","doi":"10.1098/rsif.2024.0588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intra-operative tensioning of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly based on the surgeon's experience, resulting in a possibly loose or overly tight PCL. To date, the consequences of different PCL tensioning scenarios for the post-operative biomechanics of the knee remain unclear. Using a comprehensive musculoskeletal modelling approach that allows predictive joint kinematic and kinetic balance, we assessed variations in the movement and loading patterns of the knee as well as changes in ligament and muscle forces during walking in response to systematic variations in the PCL reference strain. The results indicate only small differences in the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics and kinetics for scenarios involving up to 10% release of the PCL (relative to the baseline reference scenario with 2% residual strain). These observations remain valid for simulations performed with high- as well as with low-conformity implant designs. However, over-tensioning of the ligament was found to considerably overload the tibiofemoral joint, including altered contact mechanics, and may therefore shorten the implant longevity. Finally, no meaningful impact of the PCL reference strain on the muscle force patterns was observed. This study therefore favours balancing the knee with a slightly loose rather than tense PCL, if appropriate intra-operative PCL tension cannot be objectively achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":17488,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","volume":"21 221","pages":"20240588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Royal Society Interface","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2024.0588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intra-operative tensioning of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly based on the surgeon's experience, resulting in a possibly loose or overly tight PCL. To date, the consequences of different PCL tensioning scenarios for the post-operative biomechanics of the knee remain unclear. Using a comprehensive musculoskeletal modelling approach that allows predictive joint kinematic and kinetic balance, we assessed variations in the movement and loading patterns of the knee as well as changes in ligament and muscle forces during walking in response to systematic variations in the PCL reference strain. The results indicate only small differences in the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics and kinetics for scenarios involving up to 10% release of the PCL (relative to the baseline reference scenario with 2% residual strain). These observations remain valid for simulations performed with high- as well as with low-conformity implant designs. However, over-tensioning of the ligament was found to considerably overload the tibiofemoral joint, including altered contact mechanics, and may therefore shorten the implant longevity. Finally, no meaningful impact of the PCL reference strain on the muscle force patterns was observed. This study therefore favours balancing the knee with a slightly loose rather than tense PCL, if appropriate intra-operative PCL tension cannot be objectively achieved.

全膝关节置换术中后交叉韧带过度张力与术中松解的影响。
全膝关节置换术(TKA)中术中后交叉韧带(PCL)的张力通常是基于外科医生的经验,导致PCL可能松动或过紧。迄今为止,不同的PCL张力方案对术后膝关节生物力学的影响尚不清楚。使用全面的肌肉骨骼建模方法,可以预测关节运动学和动力学平衡,我们评估了膝关节运动和负荷模式的变化,以及行走过程中韧带和肌肉力量的变化,以响应PCL参考应变的系统变化。结果表明,在PCL释放高达10%的情况下(相对于残余应变为2%的基线参考情况),胫股和髌股的运动学和动力学只有很小的差异。这些观察结果对于高符合性和低符合性植入体设计的模拟仍然有效。然而,韧带过度张紧会使胫股关节负荷过大,包括改变接触力学,因此可能缩短假体的使用寿命。最后,没有观察到PCL参考应变对肌肉力模式的有意义的影响。因此,如果术中不能客观地获得适当的PCL张力,本研究更倾向于用稍微松弛的PCL而不是紧绷的PCL来平衡膝关节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Journal of The Royal Society Interface 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes articles of high quality research at the interface of the physical and life sciences. It provides a high-quality forum to publish rapidly and interact across this boundary in two main ways: J. R. Soc. Interface publishes research applying chemistry, engineering, materials science, mathematics and physics to the biological and medical sciences; it also highlights discoveries in the life sciences of relevance to the physical sciences. Both sides of the interface are considered equally and it is one of the only journals to cover this exciting new territory. J. R. Soc. Interface welcomes contributions on a diverse range of topics, including but not limited to; biocomplexity, bioengineering, bioinformatics, biomaterials, biomechanics, bionanoscience, biophysics, chemical biology, computer science (as applied to the life sciences), medical physics, synthetic biology, systems biology, theoretical biology and tissue engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信