Predicting mental health treatment outcomes using latent growth mixture models and machine learning in a real-world clinical setting.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Lee Lancashire, Steven Lancaster, David Linkh, Anthony Hassan, Magali Haas, Allyson Gage
{"title":"Predicting mental health treatment outcomes using latent growth mixture models and machine learning in a real-world clinical setting.","authors":"Lee Lancashire, Steven Lancaster, David Linkh, Anthony Hassan, Magali Haas, Allyson Gage","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous models of depression outcomes have been limited by symptom heterogeneity within populations. This study conducted a retrospective analysis using latent growth mixture models to identify heterogeneous trajectories within a clinical population, subsequently developing machine learning models to predict clinical outcomes based on baseline characteristics and symptom measures. The study analyzed approximately 15,000 clients aged 18-89 in a real-world clinical setting, treated for up to 180-days between 2015 and 2020. Three distinct groups were identified: Low-Low (stable low scores), High-Low (improving scores), and High-High (stable high scores), representing 56%, 18%, and 26% of the cohort, respectively. Significant differences were observed in baseline factors and outcome assessments across these groups. The machine learning model demonstrated balanced accuracies of 0.67-0.93, and ROC-AUC values between 0.87 and 0.97 in predicting group membership from baseline data. Key predictors included baseline PHQ-9 scores, sex, age, and PTSD diagnosis. Prospective application of the model accurately categorized new client data, aligning predictions with observed outcomes. The study highlights the potential of machine learning in clinical settings to predict client outcomes, offering valuable insights based on initial data, potentially enhancing treatment personalization and efficacy. Further research should explore the impact of individual treatment modalities to validate the model's clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"181 ","pages":"509-516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.12.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous models of depression outcomes have been limited by symptom heterogeneity within populations. This study conducted a retrospective analysis using latent growth mixture models to identify heterogeneous trajectories within a clinical population, subsequently developing machine learning models to predict clinical outcomes based on baseline characteristics and symptom measures. The study analyzed approximately 15,000 clients aged 18-89 in a real-world clinical setting, treated for up to 180-days between 2015 and 2020. Three distinct groups were identified: Low-Low (stable low scores), High-Low (improving scores), and High-High (stable high scores), representing 56%, 18%, and 26% of the cohort, respectively. Significant differences were observed in baseline factors and outcome assessments across these groups. The machine learning model demonstrated balanced accuracies of 0.67-0.93, and ROC-AUC values between 0.87 and 0.97 in predicting group membership from baseline data. Key predictors included baseline PHQ-9 scores, sex, age, and PTSD diagnosis. Prospective application of the model accurately categorized new client data, aligning predictions with observed outcomes. The study highlights the potential of machine learning in clinical settings to predict client outcomes, offering valuable insights based on initial data, potentially enhancing treatment personalization and efficacy. Further research should explore the impact of individual treatment modalities to validate the model's clinical utility.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信