Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on the Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
María Colmenero-Sendra, Javier Del Boz-González, Mercè Grau-Pérez, Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde, Miguel Ángel Descalzo-Gallego, Ignacio García-Doval, Eulalia Baselga Torres
{"title":"Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement on the Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas.","authors":"María Colmenero-Sendra, Javier Del Boz-González, Mercè Grau-Pérez, Ricardo Ruiz-Villaverde, Miguel Ángel Descalzo-Gallego, Ignacio García-Doval, Eulalia Baselga Torres","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although clinical practice guidelines exist for the treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IHs), recommendations are heterogeneous, and wide practice variations in IH management have been reported.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the degree of agreement in treatment choices for IH among pediatric dermatologists in North America and Europe and assess whether there are differences across IH risk categories.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional interrater and intrarater agreement study was conducted through a survey based on the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology IH prospective cohort. The survey used 50 vignettes of IH cases that were randomly selected from the cohort. It was administered twice in 2023, 1 month apart, to allow for interrater and intrarater agreement assessments. Data were analyzed in January 2024. The study involved pediatric dermatologists from North America (via the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance) and Europe (via the European Society of Pediatric Dermatologists).</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Participants were asked to choose 1 of 3 treatment options (propranolol, topical timolol, or observation) for each vignette.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>The primary outcome was the interrater agreement in treatment choices for IH cases, measured using κ statistics (Gwet AC1 coefficient).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global interobserver agreement among 90 pediatric dermatologists was fair (AC1, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.29-0.46). In North America (45 pediatricians), agreement was moderate (AC1, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.49), while in Europe (45 pediatricians) it was fair (AC1, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.28-0.46). The degree of agreement varied depending on the risk category of IH, with excellent agreement in high-risk IH and only moderate agreement in intermediate-risk and low-risk IHs. Propranolol was predominantly chosen for high-risk IH, while observation was most frequent for low-risk IH (55.9%). The second survey had 61 respondents, with no significant intrarater differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this survey study suggest that there is an important variability in the treatment of intermediate-risk and low-risk IH. The study findings support the need for more evidence regarding the role of topical timolol in IH treatment, which may help harmonize treatment approaches and improve consistency in IH management globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"203-207"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.5125","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Although clinical practice guidelines exist for the treatment of infantile hemangiomas (IHs), recommendations are heterogeneous, and wide practice variations in IH management have been reported.

Objective: To analyze the degree of agreement in treatment choices for IH among pediatric dermatologists in North America and Europe and assess whether there are differences across IH risk categories.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional interrater and intrarater agreement study was conducted through a survey based on the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology IH prospective cohort. The survey used 50 vignettes of IH cases that were randomly selected from the cohort. It was administered twice in 2023, 1 month apart, to allow for interrater and intrarater agreement assessments. Data were analyzed in January 2024. The study involved pediatric dermatologists from North America (via the Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance) and Europe (via the European Society of Pediatric Dermatologists).

Exposures: Participants were asked to choose 1 of 3 treatment options (propranolol, topical timolol, or observation) for each vignette.

Main outcome and measure: The primary outcome was the interrater agreement in treatment choices for IH cases, measured using κ statistics (Gwet AC1 coefficient).

Results: The global interobserver agreement among 90 pediatric dermatologists was fair (AC1, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.29-0.46). In North America (45 pediatricians), agreement was moderate (AC1, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.33-0.49), while in Europe (45 pediatricians) it was fair (AC1, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.28-0.46). The degree of agreement varied depending on the risk category of IH, with excellent agreement in high-risk IH and only moderate agreement in intermediate-risk and low-risk IHs. Propranolol was predominantly chosen for high-risk IH, while observation was most frequent for low-risk IH (55.9%). The second survey had 61 respondents, with no significant intrarater differences.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this survey study suggest that there is an important variability in the treatment of intermediate-risk and low-risk IH. The study findings support the need for more evidence regarding the role of topical timolol in IH treatment, which may help harmonize treatment approaches and improve consistency in IH management globally.

婴幼儿血管瘤治疗的观察者间和观察者内协议。
重要性:尽管存在婴儿血管瘤(IHs)治疗的临床实践指南,但建议是不一致的,并且IH管理的实践差异很大。目的:分析北美和欧洲儿科皮肤科医生对IH治疗选择的一致程度,并评估IH风险类别之间是否存在差异。设计、环境和参与者:这项横断面研究是通过西班牙皮肤病和性病学会(IH)的一项前瞻性队列调查进行的。该调查使用了从队列中随机选择的50例IH病例。它在2023年进行了两次管理,间隔1个月,以便进行内部和内部协议评估。数据分析于2024年1月进行。这项研究涉及来自北美(通过儿科皮肤科研究联盟)和欧洲(通过欧洲儿科皮肤科医师协会)的儿科皮肤科医生。暴露:参与者被要求从3种治疗方案中选择1种(心得安、局部替马洛尔或观察)。主要结局和测量:主要结局是IH病例治疗选择的判据一致性,使用κ统计量(Gwet AC1系数)测量。结果:90名儿科皮肤科医生的全球观察者间共识是公平的(AC1, 0.38;95% ci, 0.29-0.46)。在北美(45名儿科医生),一致性为中等(AC1, 0.41;95% CI, 0.33-0.49),而在欧洲(45名儿科医生),这是公平的(AC1, 0.37;95% ci, 0.28-0.46)。一致性程度取决于IH的风险类别,高风险IH的一致性非常好,而中风险和低风险IHs的一致性只有中等。高危IH以心得安为主,低危IH以观察为主(55.9%)。第二次调查有61名受访者,没有明显的内部差异。结论和相关性:这项调查研究的结果表明,在治疗中危性和低危性IH方面存在重要的可变性。研究结果支持需要更多关于局部噻莫洛尔在IH治疗中的作用的证据,这可能有助于协调治疗方法并提高全球IH管理的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信