Online disclosure of suicide method: What can online posts tell us about suicidal planning?

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of psychiatric research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.048
Brooke A Ammerman, Kenneth McClure, Keyne C Law, Caitlin M O'Loughlin, Ross Jacobucci
{"title":"Online disclosure of suicide method: What can online posts tell us about suicidal planning?","authors":"Brooke A Ammerman, Kenneth McClure, Keyne C Law, Caitlin M O'Loughlin, Ross Jacobucci","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rates of self-disclosure of, and subsequently formal help-seeking for, suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) remains low. However, online discussions of STBs have become increasingly prevalent, creating potential opportunities to identify those at potentially elevated suicide risk (i.e., engaging in suicidal planning). This study used linguistic analysis to examine online STB discussions to identify posts that reference a suicide method, as well as the lethality and timeframe of the identified suicide method. A corpus of 3974 posts from the online forum Reddit SuicideWatch were extracted for data analysis. Approximately one-fifth of analyzed posts mentioned a suicide method; over 35% were classified as severe risk with regard to lethality and almost 70% discussed a suicide method yet to occur. Analyses demonstrated that three categories of words - Substances, Physical, and Past Focus - were associated with increased odds of the presence of a suicide method in a post, whereas five different word categories were associated with a decrease in odds of method presence; most notably was the use of Social words. Together, results support the utility of this approach in detecting discussions of a suicide method. However, they may be less fruitful in distinguishing planning severity among posts including method discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"181 ","pages":"503-508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rates of self-disclosure of, and subsequently formal help-seeking for, suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) remains low. However, online discussions of STBs have become increasingly prevalent, creating potential opportunities to identify those at potentially elevated suicide risk (i.e., engaging in suicidal planning). This study used linguistic analysis to examine online STB discussions to identify posts that reference a suicide method, as well as the lethality and timeframe of the identified suicide method. A corpus of 3974 posts from the online forum Reddit SuicideWatch were extracted for data analysis. Approximately one-fifth of analyzed posts mentioned a suicide method; over 35% were classified as severe risk with regard to lethality and almost 70% discussed a suicide method yet to occur. Analyses demonstrated that three categories of words - Substances, Physical, and Past Focus - were associated with increased odds of the presence of a suicide method in a post, whereas five different word categories were associated with a decrease in odds of method presence; most notably was the use of Social words. Together, results support the utility of this approach in detecting discussions of a suicide method. However, they may be less fruitful in distinguishing planning severity among posts including method discussions.

网上披露自杀方式:网上的帖子能告诉我们关于自杀计划的什么信息?
自杀想法和行为(STBs)的自我表露率以及随后的正式求助率仍然很低。然而,关于性传播感染的在线讨论已经变得越来越普遍,这为识别那些有潜在自杀风险的人(即参与自杀计划的人)创造了潜在的机会。本研究使用语言分析来检查在线STB讨论,以确定引用自杀方法的帖子,以及确定的自杀方法的致命性和时间框架。从在线论坛Reddit SuicideWatch上提取了3974篇帖子进行数据分析。在被分析的帖子中,约有五分之一提到了自杀方法;超过35%的人被列为致命的严重风险,近70%的人讨论了尚未发生的自杀方法。分析表明,三个类别的词——物质、物理和过去的焦点——与帖子中出现自杀方法的几率增加有关,而五个不同类别的词与自杀方法出现的几率降低有关;最明显的是社交词汇的使用。总之,结果支持这种方法在检测自杀方法讨论中的效用。然而,它们在区分包括方法讨论在内的帖子的计划严重性方面可能不太有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信