Impact of ECPELLA support on 1-year outcomes and myocardial damage in patients with acute myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock: A single-center retrospective observational study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Takashi Unoki, Tomoko Nakayama, Keita Saku, Hiroki Matsushita, Taiji Inamori, Junya Matsuura, Takaaki Toyofuku, Tomohide Sato, Yutaka Konami, Hiroto Suzuyama, Masayuki Inoue, Eiji Horio, Kazuhisa Kodama, Eiji Taguchi, Takuya Nishikawa, Tadashi Sawamura, Koichi Nakao, Tomohiro Sakamoto, Ken Okumura, Junjiro Koyama
{"title":"Impact of ECPELLA support on 1-year outcomes and myocardial damage in patients with acute myocardial infarction and refractory cardiogenic shock: A single-center retrospective observational study.","authors":"Takashi Unoki, Tomoko Nakayama, Keita Saku, Hiroki Matsushita, Taiji Inamori, Junya Matsuura, Takaaki Toyofuku, Tomohide Sato, Yutaka Konami, Hiroto Suzuyama, Masayuki Inoue, Eiji Horio, Kazuhisa Kodama, Eiji Taguchi, Takuya Nishikawa, Tadashi Sawamura, Koichi Nakao, Tomohiro Sakamoto, Ken Okumura, Junjiro Koyama","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a vital mechanical circulatory support for treating patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). VA-ECMO can improve end-organ perfusion; however, it increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, resulting in further myocardial damage. ECPELLA, a combination of VA-ECMO and Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) treatments, is an emerging modality to optimize end-organ perfusion and LV unloading. The impact of ECPELLA in refractory CS has not been established. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECPELLA on acute-phase LV damage and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and refractory CS and compare them with those of VA-ECMO with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective observational study included 90 consecutive patients with AMI and refractory CS who received VA-ECMO between January 2012 and December 2022. Of these, 44 and 46 received ECPELLA and VA-ECMO with IABP, respectively. We assessed the serum creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) levels and 1-year mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics and time from onset to reperfusion between the two groups. Compared with VA-ECMO with IABP, ECPELLA produced lower peak CK-MB levels (265 IU/L vs. 500 IU/L, p = 0.016) and a smaller area under the curve of CK-MB during the first 3 days (274 IU/L × d vs. 534 IU/L × d, p = 0.025). ECPELLA was associated with significantly lower 1-year mortality (64% vs 91%; p = 0.001). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that ECPELLA was inversely and independently associated with 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.64; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that ECPELLA may offer myocardial protection and be associated with improved 1-year mortality in patients with AMI and refractory CS. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations and better understand the potential benefits of ECPELLA in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.12.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a vital mechanical circulatory support for treating patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). VA-ECMO can improve end-organ perfusion; however, it increases left ventricular (LV) afterload, resulting in further myocardial damage. ECPELLA, a combination of VA-ECMO and Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) treatments, is an emerging modality to optimize end-organ perfusion and LV unloading. The impact of ECPELLA in refractory CS has not been established. We aimed to investigate the effects of ECPELLA on acute-phase LV damage and outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and refractory CS and compare them with those of VA-ECMO with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP).

Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study included 90 consecutive patients with AMI and refractory CS who received VA-ECMO between January 2012 and December 2022. Of these, 44 and 46 received ECPELLA and VA-ECMO with IABP, respectively. We assessed the serum creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) levels and 1-year mortality.

Results: No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics and time from onset to reperfusion between the two groups. Compared with VA-ECMO with IABP, ECPELLA produced lower peak CK-MB levels (265 IU/L vs. 500 IU/L, p = 0.016) and a smaller area under the curve of CK-MB during the first 3 days (274 IU/L × d vs. 534 IU/L × d, p = 0.025). ECPELLA was associated with significantly lower 1-year mortality (64% vs 91%; p = 0.001). Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that ECPELLA was inversely and independently associated with 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 0.38, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.64; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ECPELLA may offer myocardial protection and be associated with improved 1-year mortality in patients with AMI and refractory CS. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations and better understand the potential benefits of ECPELLA in this population.

ECPELLA支持对急性心肌梗死合并难治性心源性休克患者1年预后和心肌损害的影响:一项单中心回顾性观察研究
背景:静脉-体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)是治疗难治性心源性休克(CS)患者的重要机械循环支持手段。VA-ECMO可改善内脏器官灌注,但会增加左心室(LV)后负荷,导致心肌进一步损伤。ECPELLA 是 VA-ECMO 和 Impella(Abiomed Inc.ECPELLA 对难治性 CS 的影响尚未确定。我们旨在研究 ECPELLA 对急性心肌梗死(AMI)和难治性 CS 患者急性期左心室损伤和预后的影响,并将其与带主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)的 VA-ECMO 进行比较:这项单中心回顾性观察研究纳入了2012年1月至2022年12月期间连续接受VA-ECMO治疗的90例AMI和难治性CS患者。其中,44 名和 46 名患者分别接受了 ECPELLA 和 VA-ECMO 加 IABP。我们评估了血清肌酸激酶心肌带(CK-MB)水平和1年死亡率:两组患者的基线特征和从发病到再灌注的时间无明显差异。与使用 IABP 的 VA-ECMO 相比,ECPELLA 产生的 CK-MB 峰值水平较低(265 IU/L vs. 500 IU/L,p = 0.016),前 3 天的时间曲线下面积较小(274 IU/L vs. 534 IU/L × d,p = 0.025)。ECPELLA 可显著降低 1 年死亡率(64% vs 91%;p = 0.001)。Cox 比例危险分析显示,ECPELLA 与 1 年死亡率呈独立的反相关关系(危险比:0.38,95% 置信区间:0.23-0.64;P 结论:我们的研究结果表明,ECPELLA 与 1 年死亡率呈独立的反相关关系(危险比:0.38,95% 置信区间:0.23-0.64):我们的研究结果表明,ECPELLA 可为急性心肌梗死和难治性 CS 患者提供心肌保护,并与 1 年死亡率的改善相关。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些观察结果,并更好地了解 ECPELLA 在这一人群中的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信