Robert F Bentley, Jonaline B Bernal, Daniel C Basile, Adam N Di Salvo, Jacob L Schwartz
{"title":"The effect of body position on cardiovascular, skeletal muscle and ventilatory responses to submaximal cycling.","authors":"Robert F Bentley, Jonaline B Bernal, Daniel C Basile, Adam N Di Salvo, Jacob L Schwartz","doi":"10.1113/EP092256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The completion of exercise in different body positions can impact the function of various components of the oxygen delivery pathway; however, the effect of the haemodynamic conditions induced by a semi-upright body position on the integrative physiological response to exercise is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of a semi-upright body position on cardiac output (CO), vastus lateralis oxygen saturation ( <math> <semantics><msub><mi>S</mi> <mrow><mi>m</mi> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{S}_{{\\mathrm{m}}{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> ), oxygen consumption ( <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) and ratings of perceived exertion (Borg RPE) during submaximal cycling. Twenty healthy individuals (22 ± 3 years, 50% female) each completed alternating 5-min bouts of submaximal upright and semi-upright (40° incline) cycling at 50 and 100 W. CO, <math> <semantics><msub><mi>S</mi> <mrow><mi>m</mi> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{S}_{{\\mathrm{m}}{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> and RPE were assessed at rest and at each exercise intensity during steady state. There was a main effect of intensity on the increase in CO, <math> <semantics><msub><mi>S</mi> <mrow><mi>m</mi> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{S}_{{\\mathrm{m}}{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> , <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> and RPE (all P < 0.001). In a semi-upright position, the increase in CO (7.9 ± 2.8 vs. 6.4 ± 2.6 L/min, P < 0.001), RPE (median (interquartile range): 11 (9-13) vs. 10 (8-12), P = 0.013) and the decrease in <math> <semantics><msub><mi>S</mi> <mrow><mi>m</mi> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </mrow> </msub> <annotation>${{S}_{{\\mathrm{m}}{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> (-38 ± 23 vs. -21% ± 18%, P < 0.001) were greater than upright, while the increase in <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> was attenuated (1.030 ± 0.130 vs. 1.154 ± 0.165 L/min, P < 0.001). These results suggest that while a semi-upright body position produces elevations in CO, these elevations do not seem to perfuse the active skeletal muscle. This may explain the elevation in RPE despite a blunting in the increase in <math> <semantics> <msub><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>̇</mo></mover> <msub><mi>O</mi> <mn>2</mn></msub> </msub> <annotation>${{\\dot{V}}_{{{{\\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> . Further work is required to understand the effects of a semi-upright exercise position on skeletal muscle activation and lower limb blood flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The completion of exercise in different body positions can impact the function of various components of the oxygen delivery pathway; however, the effect of the haemodynamic conditions induced by a semi-upright body position on the integrative physiological response to exercise is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of a semi-upright body position on cardiac output (CO), vastus lateralis oxygen saturation ( ), oxygen consumption ( ) and ratings of perceived exertion (Borg RPE) during submaximal cycling. Twenty healthy individuals (22 ± 3 years, 50% female) each completed alternating 5-min bouts of submaximal upright and semi-upright (40° incline) cycling at 50 and 100 W. CO, , and RPE were assessed at rest and at each exercise intensity during steady state. There was a main effect of intensity on the increase in CO, , and RPE (all P < 0.001). In a semi-upright position, the increase in CO (7.9 ± 2.8 vs. 6.4 ± 2.6 L/min, P < 0.001), RPE (median (interquartile range): 11 (9-13) vs. 10 (8-12), P = 0.013) and the decrease in (-38 ± 23 vs. -21% ± 18%, P < 0.001) were greater than upright, while the increase in was attenuated (1.030 ± 0.130 vs. 1.154 ± 0.165 L/min, P < 0.001). These results suggest that while a semi-upright body position produces elevations in CO, these elevations do not seem to perfuse the active skeletal muscle. This may explain the elevation in RPE despite a blunting in the increase in . Further work is required to understand the effects of a semi-upright exercise position on skeletal muscle activation and lower limb blood flow.
以不同体位完成运动会影响氧输送途径各组成部分的功能;然而,人们对半直立体位引起的血流动力学条件对运动综合生理反应的影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨半直立体位对心输出量(CO)、阔筋膜氧饱和度(S m O 2 ${{S}_{\mathrm{m}}{{{Mathrm{O}}}_2}}$ )、氧消耗量(V 哚)耗氧量(V ̇ O 2 ${{dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}$ )和亚极限骑车时的体力感知评分(Borg RPE)。20 名健康人(22 ± 3 岁,50% 为女性)在 50 W 和 100 W 下交替完成 5 分钟的次最大直立和半直立(40° 倾角)自行车运动。评估了静息时和稳态时每种运动强度下的 CO、S m O 2 ${{S}_{\mathrm{m}}{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}$ 、V φ O 2 ${{{dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ 和 RPE。运动强度对 CO、S m O 2 ${{S}_{\{mathrm{m}}{{\{mathrm{O}}}_2}}$ 的增加有主要影响、 V O 2 ${{dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ 和 RPE(所有 P S m O 2 ${{S}_{{mathrm{m}}{{{mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ ( -38 ± 23 vs. -21% ± 18%,P.-21%±18%,P V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}$ 衰减(1.030 ± 0.130 vs. 1.154 ± 0.165 L/min, P V ̇ O 2 ${{\dot{V}}_{{{{\mathrm{O}}}_2}}}$ )。要了解半直立运动姿势对骨骼肌激活和下肢血流的影响,还需要进一步的研究。
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged.
Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.